Shashank Shekhar Srivastava
07 September 2017 at 19:50
Respected laweyrs , i m a an engineering graduate in civil engineering , during my college day in September 2010 ,students of our college protested for infrastructural grievances ,but some of them jammed the NH 57, and it was removed after intervention of concerned authorities ,one day later names of 4 student were charged under section 143 ,341,353 IPC , , neither I was not even present at that moment ,nor I know that who told my name but as my name was given so I had to fight the case ,later in August 2015 I was acquitted for all the charges beyond all the shadows of reasonable doubts and was declared not guilty , so respected laweyrs I want to know that is this case now going to hamper my eligibility for UPSC (IAS,IPS,ESE) . Sir have qualified for interview in both engineering and administrative services ,but now thought of police verification is haunting me , because I read some where that APEX court has declared that person with criminal antecedent ,even if he/she is acquitted either by compermise ,or by any reason will be deemed ineligible for uniformed services.
Thanku
davy
07 September 2017 at 19:26
Has Supreme Court recently passed Judgment that SC BC category cannot claim Seat of General Category even if they secure more marks than cutoff marks of General Category?
I am Concerened bcz I got 148 Rank in Junior Engineer Job and no. of general category seats are 124 but there are 37 SC/BC students shown in the List above me if they Get job in category then I will get Job orelse it is difficult if they take general seat
harjinder
07 September 2017 at 19:01
Fighting a property case for last 15years.In 2015 Ex-parte judgement was pronounced in our favour. Section 5 was filed by the other party in 2017.The case was transfered to District Judge.All the relevant documents were produced. The other party counsellor is not ready to face the argument and unnecessary prolonging the case. Court is also granting him time and dates of his choice. Kindly advice how can I process my case sooner. I am facing a lot of problems since I have a transferable job.
Santu Bandyopadhyay
07 September 2017 at 18:02
I have a property on only my name. I wanted to sell my property to a purchaser. But the purchaser wrongly (not according to our contract) prepared the agreement paper and payed stamp dutybon that. But I do not want to go further with this deal with that purchaser any more.
NOW AM I LEGALLY BOUND TO PAY HIM A CERTAIN PROPORTION OF MONEY FOR HIS EXPENSES REGARDING HIS PREPARATION OF STAMP DUTY AND DOCUMENTS EVEN IF HE REFUND STAMP DUTY?(BEACUSE 10% WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM STAMP DUTY WHILE REFUNDING)
Anonymous
07 September 2017 at 16:55
Hi,
I have a false complaint filed by my wife in section 294B and 323. Will it impact me to travel abroad if the trial is going on? How to travel with these pending cases.
The case is now in court. Please help.
davy
07 September 2017 at 16:48
Has Supreme Court recently passed Judgment that SC BC category cannot claim Seat of General Category even if they secure more marks than cutoff marks of General Category?
hetalsangoi
07 September 2017 at 16:35
in the f.y.2016-2017 project is completed . % method is followed in Books of accounts. A Buyer has given the full consideration in F.Y.16-17 Rs 30lakhs on the base of the letter of the allotment (Letter is issued in F.Y.16-17) Where there is the clause was that letter of allotment is subject to The Promoter has agreed to allot the said Premises admeasuring [●] square feet carpet area to the Allottee, at or for the price of ` [●]/- (Rupees [●] Only) (“Sale Consideration”), and subject to the terms, conditions and covenants contained in the proforma of the Agreement for Sale submitted to the Authority . Possession has not taken till Mar 2017.
There is no execution of agreement of sale and sale deed between builder and buyer. There may be a laps from the both the sides. all the service tax and vat is paid during the F.Y.2016-2017 on this deal. Project is completed in F.Y 16-17 And in the F.Y.17-18 , deal is cancelled and full amount is reimbursed . Now question is arise , to recognize the revenue under AS-9 % method , i have following queries:
1. at least 25% salable area is secured by contract or legally enforceable with buyers : can on this basis,only letter of allotment , can it considered as secured contract .
2. can letter of allotment enforceable if the situation is that builder is not willing to enter into contract then , buyer will sue the builders on the basis of letter of allotment, then can we say under situation of 1 that now letter of allotment is enforceable under law.
3. what are the recourse viable to recognize the revenue in f.y.16-17 and 17-18 ?
pl guide on this regards.
Thanks you
ANILKUMAR
07 September 2017 at 15:46
we are 70 familys people purchased & residing with houses since 70 years ,we dont have a registration for my house lands at the time of past 70 years ago we dont have registration system,thats why we dont have a registration? actually pattadar died nearly 60 ago he dont have children and family.
now a days some body created a fake successor letter who is pattadar brother son he applied for virsat he got pattadar passbook and Title deed from revenue depatment,now he is come to court (joint colletor)he is having rights to sell all these lands,he is fighting for
since 70 years and above we are purchased and enjoying these lands we are having house tax bill,tap bills,electricity bill,some of persons having rhytu passbook issued by thasildar .
in revunue record we dont have a name in pattadar colum(who is died 60 years ago pattadar his name is continuing) we a having a colum enjoyment colum since 50 years above
this is gone for judgment to RDO court RDO is enquired all the details about lands is house site area, he cancelled which is given virasat pattadar passbook and title deed
he orderd issued seize pattadar passbook and Title deed from fake successor.
now the fake successor (pettissioner) went for Joint colletor for Judgment
who will have rights for lands(houses residing area of seventy families)?
we (Respondents) Seventy families having following documents
1.pahani copies since 1950-to -2017 ( we are in enjoyment colum)
2.some of having rhytu passbooks issued by thasildar
3.electricity issued copy since 30 years ,bills
4.house tax bills since 20-30 years
5.we are in present position in land (having houses and enjoying)
6.we are having proof for fake sucessor letter ( who is the proof of signed on fake sucessor letter is signature is wrong and at the time he is having only 14 years as per aadhar card ex:created letter at the time of 1953 who is singed as guaranteer is born on 1939 )
pettisioner having proofs:
1.some of our 2 familys are registered with pettisioner at the time he doest have a name in pattadar
2.he is having a proof after getting a passbook one member is registered with petitioner
3.iam is the respondent (iam not having name in colum enjoyment, my father is alive he is having a name in enjoyment colum in revenue records)
doubts
1can i eligile for petision for this issue?iam not having name in enjoyment colum my fathes is having name in enjoyment colum
2.iam is the petisior is going on this issue
•
•
•
•
sachin warat
07 September 2017 at 15:12
Dear Sir,
I have applied for Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna while taking the loan from bank 1 year back. Recently I have approched to the bank regarding subsidy but bankers says that Name of the female is not in your Sale Deed, Correct the Deed and then submit it to bank and submit fresh application.
Further, I have corrected my name through official gazzette and updated my KYC Documents.
Original Registry copy is with Bank
Can I correct my sale deed by using corrected name and addition of Female name in my Sale deed ? What will be approximate charges for the same ? Is any one have Draft Sale Deed copy which is fulfil the conditions given under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna ?. Please provide the same.
Thanking you,
Regards,
Sachin
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Court fees
Hi,
My lawyer has obtained stay orders on an order passed by the Karnataka Wakf board. He's charging me 30000rs and justifying the charges as
1. Court fees
2. Notification fees to notify 16 respondents
3. Order copy fees.
Please help me out before I make the payment