d.chandramohan
17 February 2018 at 13:46
My great-grandfather bought a land in 5-4-1911,in his name,in 11-12-1911 he with his younger brother had mortgaged the property,now the 3rd generation of the younger brother family have filed suit for partition claiming it as joint family property, through the mortage.kindly advise
Anonymous
17 February 2018 at 13:34
Dear Experts, While applying DIN through Spice forms, the PAN is validated but while doing check form it is mandatorily asking to fill First Name and Last Name of Applicant Father. If we enter manually the First Name and Last Name of father, the PAN is not validated. If PAN not validated, then check form is not working because of Non-PAN validations. We have Applicant Fist Name and Last Name and Applicant Father Name. But either of one is not working i.e. Check Form or PAN Validations. Due to this issue we are unable to file a SPICE forms for incorporations. If we need to get a PAN correction means then we have to wait for one more month and many of them don't add their father first name and last name in their PAN details practically. But, in DIR-3 the PAN is validating and Check Form also done and But, not in SPICE 32. Is there any solutions?
Read more at: https://www.caclubindia.com/experts/company-incorporations-spice-2630409.asp
S Umesh Rao
17 February 2018 at 09:51
Hello everybody, I wish to know and also seek opinion from experts with regard to my arbitration appeal in city civil court.
I have filed an appeal in the city civil court against an arbitration award which was given against me by the arbitrator. After filling my appeal i served copies of appeal application to my opponents.. They in tirn came and filed vakalath and dissappered totally till the case came for judgement stage. They did not file any written statement. Meanwhile during the course of the case there was no issues framed as there was no representation from the opposite side. I filed my written arguments and also ensursed that oppenents arguments hearing was made to close. Now the stage is for judgements and now all of a sudden the opponents lawyer comes and pleads the judge to allow him to argue in this matter. To my shock the judge allowed and posted the matter for further hearing. I would like to know from experts, is this correct .... How can the court allow the opponents to argue when it is finaaly closed and the stage is meant for judgement. I am appearing party in person... i am unable to keep a lawyer as i have lost about rs 9lakhs paying arbitration fees. I request the experts to kindly help me in this situation.. please let me know what needs to be done at this stage. How do i object now ... Something is happening which is unethical. Please help me.
Kool RT
17 February 2018 at 08:42
Can anyone please guide me on how can one obtain a legal heir's certificate in Mumbai? Can it be done online? Also, is a succession certificate same as legal heir certificate? If not how can that be obtained too please?
The main reason for obtaining one is as the deceased hasn't left a will behind and all his matters needs to be cleared like I.T., property, proprietary firm on his name, bank accounts etc.
Thanks a lot.
LAWYER ASSOCIATES
16 February 2018 at 23:38
A person caught with 39000 tablets of lomotil, He is rejected regular bail once, now what's the next step for bail and What are the Chances of getting bail.
Is bail a right of accussed, or discretionary power of Judge. Pls suggest
Manpreet Singh
16 February 2018 at 22:29
Dear experts
I have filed for the divorce on the grounds of mental cruelty. Now, a complaint has been filed against me and my parents in women cell by my wife. First counseling has happened and we have been given the date for the second counseling. We have just passed one year of marriage. Now, my question is, can my wife file an FIR against us with false allegation of Dowry? Do we have this kind of clause in law that wife can file FIR on the basis of above allegations until 6 years of marriage?
MANOJ SHARMA
16 February 2018 at 22:28
I served as a regular central govt employee Doordarshan from March 2002 to Nov 2009. All India Radio and Doordarshan were clubbed together and Prasar Bharat Board was formed who came in effect in 2007. The employee who had joined jobs before Oct 2007 were holding govt job status. I was in scale of 5000-8000 and existing EAs were in 6500-10,500. Later for equal work and equal pay the court asked to give all EA who have joined before Oct 2007 the same scale ie 6500-10500. The same was provided for existing EAs. I resigned the job in Nov 2009 tendering technical resignation and joined DGAQA Min of Defence. Now when I approached All I dia Radio/ Doordarshan/ Prasar Bharat,t they are denying the arrears saying that I have left job and hence I shall not be paid. Since I have worked in same conditions as of existing EAs from March 2002 to Nov 2009, I believe I must be paid the same scale and arrears must be paid to me. This enhancement may also add my salary in pressent deptt due to pay fixation due to this enhancement. Please Can some expert advise me and take my case at Delhi CAT and let me know the avg cost of the case.
Priyadharshini B
16 February 2018 at 19:57
In my sslc certificate i have an issue that my school name is printed as "Private". I did my 10th in school but in that school due to some formats they published almost 20 students as private. Till now i have not faced any problems but now some concern not accepting me as a private student. Is there any possibilities to change it from private to any school name? Kindly help me. I did my 10th in 2010-2011.
Anonymous
16 February 2018 at 19:38
I am a complainant requesting for relief from Def in Service by a Club (the club)
The club is managed by xxxx Pvt Ltd which is owned by yyyy Ltd
I applied for membership to the club and received membership from the Manager of the club along with the Bye Laws.
In my complaint I had made the Manager as OP
The Bye Laws , right in the beginning states :
Quote
The manager will be over all in charge of the Club
Unquote
For the notice the xxxx Pvt Ltd responded as OP . In his Affidavit , he has contended that the complaint is liable to be dismissed for Non Joinder of necessary parties.
Is he , legally , justified in doing so ? Is the contention sustainable ? Please clarify
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Legality of an act
dear members,
It is legal or lawful if a person doing P.hd. from a government university and at the same time that person is also doing job in a private university as a Asst. Professor on regular appointment.