Anonymous
21 March 2018 at 23:04
Hi.
I have an annual income of 11 lacs from salary and till date savings of Rs. 25 lacs which earns an interest of 1.5 lacs annually through fixed deposits. However because the tax slab applicable for me is 30%, I end up paying tax of 45 thousand every year on my income from FD. We are a Hindu family and eligible to open an HUF account. I also understand that if I open an HUF account and show the FD income in that account my tax liability will reduce.
However I have the following queries:
1. Do I need to transfer the saving of 25 lacs in the HUF account (created on the new HUF PAN card) ? Or can i only take the interest income is HUF bank account without moving my savings to HUF account?
You may choose not to answer this one as I can find it out from the bank. But if you have any idea please share your thoughts.
2. In case If I transfer my savings to HUF account as gift, can I take it back from HUF account to my personal savings account (may be to buy a property or such a big expense) without paying any tax? Or will it be considered as income in my personal bank account and I will be liable to pay tax for such a transfer from huf to personal account?
Any help on this is appreciated. Thank you in advance
Anonymous
21 March 2018 at 22:58
I have purchased a flat in Dehradun. The prperty is about to be completed soon. The builder has issued a possession certificate for fit out purpose. What does it mean.
Neelam
21 March 2018 at 21:19
I have completed 3 years of service and now my employer has asked to leave without any reason. Am I entitled to get gratuity.
Vinod Kumar Soni
21 March 2018 at 20:01
महोदय
मैंने बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया द्धारा कराई गई ई -नीलामी से दिनांक 30/03/2016 को मिर्ज़ापुर शहर में एक रिहायसी मकान जिसका रिज़र्व प्राइस बैंक द्धारा रुपया 1102000/- हजार तय किया गया था पर मैंने सबसे ज्यादा बोली बोलकर रुपया 1317000/- हजार में बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया से क्रय किया और दिनांक 08/042016 को सारा रुपया जमा कर दिया एवं बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया ने दिनांक 26/05/2016 को मेरे नाम रजिस्ट्री भी कर दी, नीलामी में भाग लेने से पहले बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मिर्ज़ापुर के तत्कालीन मुख्य प्रबंधक श्री मयंक जैन एवं जोनल ऑफिस के विधि प्रबंधक श्री दिनेश सिंह जो वर्तमान में भी हैं ने कहा था कि रजिस्ट्री के 15-20 दिन के अंदर जिला मजिस्ट्रेट से परमिशन लेकरके आपको आपके द्धारा क्रय किये गए मकान पर भौतिक कब्ज़ा दिला दिया जायेगा इसी क्रम में बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया ने धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत दिनांक 12/05/2016 को भौतिक कब्ज़ा लेने हेतु जिला मजिस्ट्रेट न्यायलय में अपील दाखिल किया इसी बीच चांदतारा देवी गारंटर जो कि संजय गुप्ता ऋणी की माँ हैं एवं बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया ने गारंटर चांदतारा देवी के मकान को नीलामी करके मुझे बेच दिया, चांदतारा देवी को पता चलने पर उन्होंने बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया के खिलाफ दिनांक 03/06/2016 को DRT allahabad SA दाखिल कर दिया जिसका फैसला आज तक नहीं हुआ परन्तु DRT allahabad से कोई इस्थगन आदेश नही था,इसी बीच बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मिर्ज़ापुर के मुख्य प्रबंधक श्री मयंक जैन का ट्रांसफर हो गया,बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मिर्ज़ापुर के पैनल अधिवक्ता द्धारा मुक़दमे में कोई पैरवी न करने एवं तारीखों में उपस्थित न होने के कारण न्यायलय अपर जिला मजिस्ट्रेट मिर्ज़ापुर के यहाँ से बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया द्धारा दाखिल मुकदमा दिनांक 22/03/2017 को अदम पैरवी पे वाद खारिज़ हो गया इस प्रकरण की शिकायत मैंने बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया के विधि प्रबंधक श्री दिनेश सिंह से कि तो उन्होंने बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मिर्ज़ापुर के वर्तमान मुख्य प्रबंधक मो० सहाबुद्दीन ने पैनल के दूसरे विद्धान अधिवक्ता श्री सुरेश सिंह के द्धारा न्यायलय जिला मजिस्ट्रेट मिर्ज़ापुर के यहां पुनः संपत्ति पर भौतिक कब्ज़ा लेने हेतु वाद संख्या D-2017165303369/2017 जिसपर सुनवाई के उपरान्त न्यायालय अपर जिलाधिकारी मिर्ज़ापुर ने दिनांक 24/08/2017 को अपने आदेश में यह लिखा कि नगर मजिस्ट्रेट जनपद मिर्ज़ापुर को यह निर्देशित किया जाता है कि निर्दिष्ट एसेट जिसका उपर उल्लेख किया जा चूका है पर कब्ज़ा लेकर बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मिर्ज़ापुर के अधिकृत अधिकारी को हस्तगत करा दें एवं पुलिस अधीछक मिर्ज़ापुर कब्ज़ा लेने के लिए नगर मजिस्ट्रेट जनपद मिर्ज़ापुर को आवश्यक पुलिस बल उपलब्ध करायेंगे, इस आदेश के बाद बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मेरे प्रकरण में न जाने क्यों शिथिल पड़ गई मेरे बार बार अधिकारियो से मिलने पर बैंक के विधि प्रबंधक श्री दिनेश सिंह जी ने दिनांक 06/12/2017 को नगर मजिस्ट्रेट मिर्ज़ापुर को न्यायालय अपर जिलाधिकारी मिर्ज़ापुर के आदेश की प्रति के साथ कब्ज़ा दिलाने हेतु पत्र लिखा जिसपर भी नगर मजिस्ट्रेट मिर्ज़ापुर ने पुलिस बल के साथ संपत्ति पर कब्ज़ा दिलाने के लिए 11/01/2018 की तारीख तय कर दी परन्तु बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मिर्ज़ापुर के किसी अधिकारी/अधिवक्ता ने किये गए आदेश को रिसीव करने में रूचि नहीं दिखाई और दिनांक 09/01/2018 को अचानक बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मिर्ज़ापुर के वर्तमान मुख्य प्रबंधक मो० सहाबुद्दीन की तबियत ख़राब हो गई और वो वाराणसी इलाज हेतु चले गए,
महोदय मेरे प्रकरण को दो साल हो गए हैं और बैंक आज भी इसी तरह से हीलाहवाली कर रहा है मुझे उचित सलाह दें कि मुझे इस प्रकरण में क्या करना चाहिए
सादर
विनोद कुमार सोनी
9415206590
vinodsonimzp@gmail.com
Kumari Cheenu
21 March 2018 at 18:02
I am DH. JD has already been served notice of Execution Petition in 2017 and appeared also but only once.
On last date, JD was absent and perhaps ADJ could not see that JD has already been served the notice hence ADJ ordered me to file PF again. I appear in person, do not know much, I was expecting that ADJ is ordering warrant for possession against JD or something like that. But when I found that ADJ has ordered me to file PF, I got confused.
There-after I Googled and found that section 152 CPC can be used for getting the Court Order rectified.
The question to the Ld. Experts is, should I file the PF again or should I file an application u/s 152 CPC to get the last Order rectified/changed?
What are the plus and minus points of both of these options and which one is better?
Suresh kumar
21 March 2018 at 17:18
My friend is a trademan in BSF. He joined Bsf in 2005, He filled a form for SI deppt exam in 2012, He passed written for S I . Deppt Exam in 2012. after it he was passed by PST board in Height weight and Chest, means Physical Standard Test, after it he passed PET, means physical efficiency test, after it he was called for Medical, in Medical he was declared medical unfit in lessHeight, He was already passed by physical board before the medical, in remedical he was again declared medical unfit in lessHeight, Doctor can not declare medical unfit to any candidate in Medical test. No any rule in Medical science related it, MHA also made rules about it in 2015,
If doctor is liable for offence under ipc section 166
If Doctor work is Ultra vires
Plz guide or help
Anonymous
21 March 2018 at 16:57
Dear All,
I need help in case of filing divorce petition to understand which place has the jurisdiction ,below are the case points:
1. Got Married in Mumbai
2. Last staying together in India was in Calcutta.
3. Went to USA for few years and there difference cropped up and both got separated and both came back to India. Girl stays in Nagpur and Boy now in Chennai.
4. No contact since last 5 years and efforts for mutual consent divorce last year did not work hence went for divorce petition filing .
Now question is where should the case be filed ? Any reference case laws would certainly help here. Thanks for reading .
Regards,
TR Madhavan
21 March 2018 at 16:50
Our Housing Complex have applied for drinking water connection with the Hyderabad Metro Water Supply and Sewerage Board. They have agreed to provide Bulk Supply Connection.
As we found the charges levied worth about a one crore for providing connection, which not affordable from our side sought relaxation of norms for payment under certain heads which neither adjustable nor refundable. But got reply that, all charges are levied as per the Board norms and need to pay compulsory, only on RWH Structure consultancy services charges are adjustable.
We wrote to the Government of Telangana and as there's no response from it and due date for the payment as per order has ended.
we seek experts opinion can challenge the orders for relaxation of norms of payments through State Consumer Commission and is there a chance of orders from the commission to government to review the payment orders as requested by us?
Anonymous
21 March 2018 at 16:50
Mr.A has purchased an agricultural land from Mr. B and later A has sold this land to Mr. C.After completing all formalities, Mr.C converted this agri land and established his industry there. Now legal heirs of Mr.B have filed a civil suit stating that land being joint property and they were minors at the time of sale and Mr.B could have sold only his share.They requested the court to issue an injection to Mr.C, not to dispose of the property till the disposal of the case, which the court granted ex-parte.Mr.C has informed the court that he will abide by court's injection.Now they have requested for another injection to restrain Mr. C from carrying his business( industry ).which is before the court now.Can the court allow this? Is this not the infringement of the constitutional right of carrying his business legally?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Compensation from central government department
Under which article/provision of law can an application be filed in the high court for demanding compensation against a central govt department for wrongful issuance of a license to some people and on the basis of the license I acted and sufferred loss and later came to know that due to ignorance of the department the license was wrongly issued to fraud people.