Vineet
14 March 2009 at 15:39
Dear sirs,
My name is Vineet and I am employed with a leading telecom MNC. I am a rehire here and joined it 10 months back.
I had myself applied for this job, considering the nice time and learning opportunity I had in its previous centre, and based upon my earlier performance, was offered.
But here I found situation to be much different and work culture diminished.Long hours, Back pain and red eyes became a regular problem.
Now I have got a job with another good firm and they want me to join as soon as possible.
1) I have 45 days notice period here and it is mentioned that I can pay salary in lieu of that if I do not wish to serve full notice period.
2) I gave them a 15 day notice period and sent my resignation through e-mail. But now my manager did not respond to this e-mail.
3) HR Manager and my manager both asked me to serve the full notice period. When I talked about buyout, they said "such a option does not exist", while it does exist as per my appointment letter.
4) They proposed to change me to a new project which is "supposed" to have a more work-life balance based working condition. But as I know that this project will also be managed by my current manager, who is, the only one responsible for spoiling culture of this company, I do not want to consider that.
Now as I have made up my mind to change company, ready to buy out notice period, does this company:
1) has legal rights to retain my experience letter?
2) has rights to not do my Full and Final settlement?
3) What legal action can I take against this company in case they do not give me my relieving cum experience letter and my dues?
The reason for not releasing me is said to be that they can not find a replacement of me and they do not have a mitigation plan.
But as this company has been unethical to by all means in my stay here, I do not wish to forfeit this good offer. Can they force me to stay legally on basis of such statements?
Please provide me you exper help. I am in urgent need of this.
Regards,
Vineet.
Dear Sir,
My query is related to Circular No.108/02/2009 dated 29/01/2009 by ST Department.
I had entered into two agreements with a Builder for sale of undivided share in the land and a constrction agreement for the construction of Apartment and I am paying consideration in monthly instalments.No sale deed has been executed in favour of me.I had already paid 40% of the amount which includes Service Tax.
My specific doubt is:-
Whether I have to continue to pay Ser.Tax as per the second agreement for the value of apartment as the second agreement with the Company is a construction agreement and the Circular didn't mention anything about construction agreement for residential units.
Kindly advise me.
Regards,
JAGADEESH
Under the Maharastra apartments act what procedure can apply for the new build up Apartment?
Which procedure must be follow under the law?
Give the reference of sections under this act?
Which documents are necessary for the apartment construction?
himanshu singh
14 March 2009 at 13:34
Dear sir, i want to know that if a company making false declaration, (E.g. the company commits that it is providing such services, but the company has not licence to provide such services), and the consumer believing on the statement purchases the products of the company, (1)what will be the rights of the consumers?
(2)What actions a consumer can take against the company?
Please give me suggestion in this regard.
Thanking You.
Whether a Private Trust can be settlor for another Private Trust.
Here a trust has been bequeathed with some property which it wants to distribute to various beneficiaries by forming seperate trusts. So the Trust itself needs to be a settlor for forming other trusts. Can this be possible??
Pls advise.
Sanjeev Mohan
14 March 2009 at 05:45
Sir,
Is there any ruling to the effect that a document which is requiered by law to be registered, but is not registered; cannot be looked into by the court even for collateral purposes?
Gaurav Nanda
14 March 2009 at 00:07
Hi can a person who has done B.A. do LLB after the age of 52 (almost close to be becoming a senior citizen) and then after completing his 3 year law degree practice after 55?
I read somewhere that delhi HC allowed joining of LLB course even for senior citizens but now i am hearing verbally that SC has overturned this, but i am not sure that these r rumors or truth. Please clarify the current status on this
Dear Members,
A nationalised Bank entered into a agreement with private body for security guards. remuneration of unarmed guards was fixed Rs. 3775/ per month per guards and Rs.7134/ was fixed for armed guards. the person who has signed the agreement manupulated and received payment Rs. 7134/- for unarmed guards from four branches up to 4 months. the bank stopped the payment and also denyed to operate the accounts of the person who has signed agreement. He has filed Civil Suit for Injunction against bank.
whether bank can claim refund of excess payment through counter claim or through fresh suit. suggest immediately
Dear Members,
A nationalised Bank entered into a agreement with private body for security guards. remuneration of unarmed guards was fixed Rs. 3775/ per month per guards and Rs.7134/ was fixed for armed guards. the person who has signed the agreement manupulated and received payment Rs. 7134/- for unarmed guards from four branches up to 4 months. the bank stopped the payment and also denyed to operate the accounts of the person who has signed agreement. He has filed Civil Suit for Injunction against bank.
whether bank can claim refund of excess payment through counter claim or through fresh suit. suggest immediately
Change of name in Revenue Records.
Dear Forum Members,
A person got the property through will.
What is the procedure for implementing the change in the Ownership in Revenue records?
With regards...