Subrahmanyam
29 March 2009 at 16:52
Hi, please anyone tell me the subjects / syllabus for the 3 Yr LLB course in Andhra Pradesh
ashis
29 March 2009 at 16:28
every one invited
sir as a student please clearify folloings (i am totally confused with given explainations):
1.under consideration:::
what does it mean that a- The promisee must suffer legal detriment
b- detriment must induce promise c- the promise must induce the detriment
2- WHAT IS motive and past consideration
3- WHAT IS sham and nominal consideration
exceptions
regards (KINDLY TELL ME A SITE IN WHICH MATTERS REGARDING CONTRACTS ARE GIVEN )
ashis
kumar
29 March 2009 at 14:57
hi, i am private employee and i married a girl working as HR for reputed company.after my marriage March 28,2008 she stay at my home till November 1,2008. Then without reason she left to her home.Every Month she go to her home for a week and she returns.i thought same but later situation change.Her father and mother approach 3rd party members and make a mess that my parents are harassing their daughter.Now March 29,2009.She going to her job and no contacts between each other.Couple of meets between myself and thier parents..but things are not resolving.Now iam not interest to contine family with her. can i apply for divorce? if yes how can i start my process
Member (Account Deleted)
29 March 2009 at 11:20
My case Details:
I am on the complaint side, accused has done signature on cheque in the form of "name father's name" but in bank true signature of accused is as "name father's name surname" so basically difference is he has not wrriten surname on cheque.
on the other side when cheque bounced, memo of bank has described two reasons namely:
1) signature differs
2) Insufficient fund
Accused has argued in court that there is "signature differ" so there is not application of sec 138.
1)What is the winning chance of our side?
2)I has heard of that there is suprem court judgement of this type, so please provide me the citation of judgement.
ess oberoi
29 March 2009 at 10:48
I want the following two judgments :-
(a) Islamia Academy of Education & Anr Vs State of Karnataka & Ors (2003) 6 SCC 697
(b)Ghaziabad Development Authority Vs Balbir Singh (2004) 5 SCC 65
Can you guide me ? Where Can I get free judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and Hon'ble High Courts etc. ?
N.K.Assumi
29 March 2009 at 07:29
Petition was filed under 457 of the CrPc for interim release of the vehicle which was rejected by the Court. can the same Court review its order under section 362 of the CrPc? as the district Transport Officer has clarified tha the claimant is the registered owner of the vehicle?
N.K.Assumi
29 March 2009 at 07:24
A chowkidar of a School bought a second hand coat and found $1000 dollars in the coat. Can it be exchange in the bank with Indian Currency?
N.K.Assumi
29 March 2009 at 07:19
In a case of theft of vehicle, the registered owner of the vehicle claim for interim release of the vehicle pending trial of the case as the police has not filed charge sheet. But the court refused to release the vehicle and direct the owner of the vehicle to prove their ownership otherwise the vehicle will be confiscated and dispose it off even though the trial has not commence.is it competent for the Court to dispose off the vehicle before the trial and is it proper for the court to direct the owner to prove their innocence before the trial?
N.K.Assumi
29 March 2009 at 07:10
Government acquired a large plot of land for development of administrative complex, and agreement was entered with the land owner that all the unskillled work would be allotted to the land owner icluding IV grade staff.But no development was made nor IV grade post was offer to the land owner and the land became a waste land for nearly 11 years.Now the land owner desire to enter the land and possess it as there is breach of conditions by the Government.In this position does article 66 of the LA apply? or it is covered by other provisions of the LA.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Dismissal of appeal for default
Dear All,
In an appeal proceedings, the apellant after filling appeal petition and after filling of Affidavit in Opposition by the respondents, the appellant do not appear on several occassion to hear the FAO on merits. In such a case can the appellate court dismissed the appeal on merits inspite dismisal of appeal for default?