Ravi Dutt Issar
30 July 2018 at 21:47
What to do if i want to change the regd. office address of a trust from delhi to Haryana state? What are the formalities and the procedure?
Manpreet Singh
30 July 2018 at 21:21
Dear Experts, What if a person does not appear on the 2nd meeting of mediation? Would the other party get any benefit out of it who was present ?
CSR
30 July 2018 at 19:56
Hello All,
I had a SBI credit card and it had a limit of 48000/-.
As I was out of town and had my personal issue and shifted my hometown I couldn't replay bills for almost 10 months and they contacted me to my new mobile number stating you have to repay the amount within 3 days otherwise it would be a lokadalat case...
I tried my level best to pay 20000/- but asked sometime to pay the remaining and bank officials are not agreeing and telling the payment you made would be invalid and it would be handled by lokadalat case...
Can you all experts help me out is there any option to avoid lokadalat and asking bank time to give me some more days to repay the remaining 28000/-..?
Please do sujjest me and help.is highly appreciable ...
Radhakrishnaa S
30 July 2018 at 19:32
Sir,
Iam Bank manager and in one of my case
Which was decreed on 20-10-2005 final decree against mortgage suit. Party came for settlement and remitted Rs. 100000/ ON 25-10-2010 and there after bank officials not followed the case and misplaced the bundles. I found the case bundles and hand advocate on Feb 2018 and my advocate say it's time barred. In case the EP was filed or not no information with the file. Original case was filed in 1989. I need guidance in the issue.
Anonymous
30 July 2018 at 19:00
Respected Experts !
Following is my query:-
Facts are :-
1. "A", a tenant is occupying the suit premises.
2. "B" is a co-owner of said suit premises, whose title is absolutely clear and not disputed anywhere. He is also the landlord of "A".
3. "C" is an alleged co-owner of said suit premises, whose title is under cloud and challenged.
4. 'D" is a person who purchased the suit premises from "C" (whose title is under cloud).
"A" is still in possession of the suit premises. Even after the sale/purchase done by "C" & "D".
Said transaction coming to the knowledge of "B", "B" instituted a suit for declaration (cancellation of sale deed) and mesne profits. He also moved an application before the court to restrain C & D from alienating, transferring etc. of suit premises.
Consequently the court passed an order that "the defendants are directed to maintain staus quo in respect to title and possession of suit property"
The Order is still subsisting.
After few years of this order and during the pendency of said suit, "A" vacated the premises and peacefully handed over posession to "B". Consequently, "B" entered into an agreement to sell to a third party, in regard to suit premises only, and for a certain consideration put him into the posession of suit premises.
Consequently, "D" moved an application before the court that "B" has disobeyed the status quo order and he be punished forthwith.
My questions are:-
1. Whether the order passed by the Honorable High Court is binding on "B" as well ?
2. If No, then clarify why not and also acknowledge me certain citations.
3. If Yes, then what is the best remedy available to "B" and the third party who purchased it ?
Kindly Consider and Reply accordingly.
Thanks.
Trixendres
30 July 2018 at 16:40
If a boy and girl want to marry each other both are hindus but girl is related to boy's family that girls is a boy's faher's fater's father's brother's daughter's daughter then they can marry under the special hindu marriage act plzz tell me...
chirag patel
30 July 2018 at 16:34
We are two employees who have challenged our petition in Gujarat High Court. One has challanged in the year 2016 and I had challenged in the year 2017. My friends case in on the final hearing board and comes up on the board on every friday. My case is admitted and still doesnt comes on the final hearing. Since the two cases are similar in nature, can we club these two cases ...what is the procedure to club these two cases.
Mohammed Rizwan Shaikh
30 July 2018 at 15:14
Hi,
In a Testamentary Petition for the Grant of Letter of Administration in HC Bombay, a Caveat was filed and it turned into a suit. A Notice of Motion was moved by the Caveator for the stay over the flat and other property as these property is the subject matter of the Testamentary Petition/Suit. Hon'ble Justice asked to withdraw it as the court does not have jurisdiction. The NM was filed as per the advice of the Caveator's Advocate. As there is a dispute between the Legal Heirs, is it advisable to file Partition Suit or Suit u/s 39 CPC. The advocate has informed that the LH are denying your rights, if Partition Suit is filed you need to be declared as Legal Heir. The Partition Suit will be pending as Testamentary Suit has not been decided yet. Its better to move Suit u/s 39 CPC for stay over the properties and not to forcefully dispossess. Please advice.
Please Note:
The Caveator is the wife of the deceased who holds the estate.
The Legal Heirs purposely denying the rights of the Caveator and illegally claiming their rights over the property as one of the property has been gifted (Muslim) to the caveator by the deceased.
Regards,
Mohammed Rizwan Shaikh
Suresh Rao
30 July 2018 at 14:18
I need expert advice i am facing IPC section 309 fir registered on 2012.
It is true that attempt to suicide decriminalised in india.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Blackmailing
Hi,
I am facing a big problem right now, i accidentally fallen in love with a married man who is 12 years older to me. back then in 2007 i didnt know his marital status. so i was in relationship with this man, he used me in all sorts of ways as we were working in the same company. he took a lot of money from me from 2007 to 2013 which he returned in bits and pieces. ours was an on and off relation as whenever i tried to stop all contacts with him he tried to blackmail me that he would come down to my family and friends and hence abused me and blackmailed me.
now in 2015 when i got married to another man (arrange marriage) he threatened me again and even called up my parents and then my husband and in laws. i told everything to my husband but he was very orthodox (living in america) and decided to leave me, and from 2015 aug the case was filed to fight and now i m going to get divorce.
now from 2015 to 2017 he tried to be very apologetic and since i was broken financially and mentally he told me he would help me with finances as i was going through a lot of downs in my life then.
he provided monthly expenses on his own and asked me to use it. I did. as i had no job since he even called my bosses of previous companies and i had to leave my job from there as a result i was jobless and about to get divorced.
4 days ago his wife got the access of his bank. however he never transferred anything into my account directly but used a dummy bank account (in the name of his wife) to his own account and his account debit card was with me. the biggest issue was that for every transaction he marked remarks which included my name.
now the whole family is again after me and yesterday i transferred more than 10 lac as returned amount into his account but his entire family is after my life threatening me they will come over my place and create a big scene. they are tracing my bank account, my phone records and my car movements. and i am being verbally abused by the man everyday and getting constant threat to give him money or else they all will ruin my life and family.
i havnt been in touch with hm from past 2.5 years as not spoken to him over phone or something.
I am really very scared & tensed and i dont know what to do or where to go.
please help me asap. i m utter need of help since i m left with no other option but to commit suicide.