a.manoharan
27 September 2009 at 08:31
Dear friends,
Bank issued loan on intestate property to legal heirs of wife and son on the basis of Legal Heirship Certificate issued by the Revenue Authorities and the same Mortgage was registered also. When defaulted, the Bank issued possession notice under Serfesi Act , now one unexpected legal heir saying another son sent Legal Notice claiming 1/3 equal share in the total property of house . In these circumstances , how will the Bank proceed further ? What are the Bank's other remedies ? Whether Bank can proceed further under Serfesi Act or to approach DRT directly without proceeding further under Serfesi Act?
PJANARDHANA REDDY
27 September 2009 at 07:49
I REQUEST THE QUERIEST TO MENTION THE FROM WHICH STATE THE CASE IS FALLING, ACCORDINGLY THE EXPERT CAN GUIDE AS PER THE LOCAL LAWS...
Dipak pritam
27 September 2009 at 04:52
Sir,
Once the police has been registered the FIR on 06-Mar-2005, and Submit charge, police authority has been to file charge sheet in court, on 30-Jan2009.
Accuse has charge in FIR IPC 302/448/149/148/147/27 ARMS ACT and
According to FIR he is member of mob.,
Please clearly me that person if eligible for Government jobs. That case He can face problem in getting Government jobs. Or not. What is law Government jobs for that condition.
Ashu
26 September 2009 at 23:12
can any insured person get back the policy amount after three years even after policy lapsed due to non payment of premium .....if any can you suggest me any supreme court judgment
kamala
26 September 2009 at 23:05
can a bank issue SARFEASI notice in the name of the deceased person
Can a bank insist on a sucession certificate to transfer the loan in hte name of wife
Sunlawseeker
26 September 2009 at 23:00
Hai everybody !
I need a clarification on what is the procedure to convert a 30 cents of agricultural land to the same extent of commercial land?
thanking you
arunkumarbhattacharyya
26 September 2009 at 22:55
now a days most of the bank employee (clerical &subordinate cadre) are working beyond duty hours viz,6-30hours &7 hours respectively to complete their days work,moreover they were refused to pay any overtime allownce ,not only bank management
refuses to give any written order either to stay beyond duty hours or used this type of language that it is within your service condition to complete the work whatever may be the timing is. what should be the course of action at that time?Either refuses to work without office order or wait until the order issued ,no work to be done? please advise.
Sunlawseeker
26 September 2009 at 22:41
Hai Everybody !
My friend is working with Transport department in Tamil nadu. He was joined in service on 11.04.1975 as helper but in records that date was wrongly taken into consideration as 29.12.1976.
From that day to till the date he is trying to rectify this problem. Some of the steps taken by him including letter sent to his MD and the state CM.
But, till now, no result for them.
Could you help me to solve this problem since he is going to retire from the service within 6 months.
thanking you
Balamurugan
26 September 2009 at 20:47
Dear Exprets,
I am facing problem with my GTPL broadband service providers. I have paid Rs.1655 as a cheque and Rs.250 as a cash on 26th june 2009 to Market executive. He gave me bill for Rs.1655 only not for cash Rs.250. After one and half month he returned my cheque and said that we are not able to provide services at your place and he committed me that he will return my cash Rs.250 after 2 to 3 days. Whenever i call him he say that i will come and return today but still he has not returned cash now its passed 3months. I called their customer care service center they said that their is no entry on their system regarding my payment details & my request for new connection but i have receipt of Rs.1655 that i have paid by cheque.
Now my concern is that he has not returned my cash Rs.250 and their is no entry in their system regarding my new connection request. What should i do to get my cash back & is there any legal procedure? but i dont have receipt of Rs.250.
Please suggest me that what should i do to solve my problem.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
rectification..
filed a complaint against proprietor firm under sec. 138 of N. I. Act. The name of the proprietor is typed correctly but the name of proprietor firm is typed wrongly both in complaint and evidence affidavit. the said mistake was recognized at the time of cross examination. can such mistakes be rectified??? if possible please provide case laws.....