Suchitra. S
21 October 2009 at 11:09
Respected experts,
I want to know whether it is legal duty of the adopted parents to reveal the fact that he/she is an adopted child? What if they dont reveal? Is there any difference in the rights of adopted child and other children of the same couple? Coz, usually adoption homes compel the adopted parents to reveal the fact to the child.
Kamal Grover
21 October 2009 at 11:08
I wish All of U a Very Very Happy Diwali.
May Maa Lakshmi bless all of you and full fill desires of all of you.
Heartiest best wishes from me and my family to all of you and your family members.
Regards
adv.kamal.grover@gmail.com
09814110005
shrikant chavan
21 October 2009 at 10:58
I would like know which law govern, vatan devastan, inam land situated in maharashtra? is there any special restriction on transfer these land?
Anonymous
21 October 2009 at 08:58
Hello! all
Greetings,
We've a proposal to purchase a site from as association, at present we're in lease of 10 years in that site, 5 years are completed. Now, that association wants to sell that site and take another site in another place. As we're in position in that site and lease period is also in active and we've constructed some sheds & an office in that site.
Now, what are the precautions, we've to take to purchase that site, as it is an associations site.
The body of association has elected the president/secretary as the person to sign on the sale document.
Please advise us how best we can do
Thanks & Regards
PJANARDHANA REDDY
21 October 2009 at 07:31
DEAR EXPERT,
CAN ANY ONE PLS PROVIDE ME THE FULL CASE LAWS OF THE BELOW ::
Where cheques issued as security, on dishonour of such cheque, not offence under Sec.138 of the Act (2001 (2) RCR (Crl.) 75 MP) also see 2002 (3) Crimes 145 ( Raj).
In 1997 Crl. Law Journal 1942 A.P.,
20. Time barred debt: Where cheque itself was issued for a time barred debt, there cannot be conviction under provisions ( 1997 (2) Crimes 658). Where the loan was taken in 1985 and cheque was issued in 1990 and the loan is barred by limitation, drawer of cheque cannot be prosecuted (1997 (1) ALT (Cri.) 509
. Request not to present the cheque : When after issuance of a cheque and before presentation for encashment, a request was made by the husband of the accused not to present the cheque. In spite of the same it was presented and a return. Complaint is not maintainable ( 1997 (1) Crimes 55); 1996 (3) Crimes 385 (Mad) = 1996 (4) CCR 92 (Mad).
P.C. Joshi
21 October 2009 at 06:25
Dear Friends
Pls let me have your views on the following query.
A is appointed as as a CS in a company. On joining day itself he has to send some communication to S/E regrding intimation of board meeting and news paper advertisement in the newspaper. He comes to know that the ex-CS has not yet resined and relieved who is on a long leave. Management says to A sign all the communiaction from day of joining itself and says that the resignation of es-Cs will be obtained with backdate effect. Furrther, A has not been given appointment letter as yet and the board resolution for his appointment will be passed at a b.m. scheduled next week. now my queries are:
1. Is it legally prpoer for A to sign the docs/communication as CS without having received any appointment letter received OR board resolution passed for his appointment when the ex-CS has not given reignation to the company.
2. Can the resolution for appointment of A be passed at the next B.M. with restropective effct OR it will be better to pass the resolution by circulation.
3. Is the resignaion letter of ex-CS compulsory for filing form 32 for ceasation of ex-CS. If ex-CS does n't give resignation, can company terminate him and file form 32 on the basis of resolution for termination/removal.
Matter is urgent pls revert.
Regards
P.C. Joshi
Anonymous
21 October 2009 at 00:34
On a prime location i.e.on the main road in a very busy center a small piece of land claiming by two sections of the society.But they don’t have any evidence that the land belonging to that particular section of the society. It became a disputed land and the case is pending in the court. Both sections are claiming that it is having some historical importance of theirs. Till today Archeological department not involved.
My question is
Under what section the land can bring protected land in the interest of the people?
GIRISH AGRAWAL
21 October 2009 at 00:05
12 PERSON HAS FILED SEPRATE COMPLAIN APPLICATION BEETWEEN JULY 27 TO AUG 20 IN 2 POLICE STATION AGINST THE 5 ACCUSE
FACTS OF CASES-
================
1. PERSONATION OF OF THE MCX COMMODITY EXCHANGE OF INDIA'S BROKER THE FIVE ACCUSED HAS COLLECT MORE THAN RUPEES ONE CRORE RUPEES OF 24 PEOPLE ON THAIR FIRM.
2. THEY ARE LAUNCHED A MONTHLY SCHEME THAT THAY ARE PROMISSE GIVE PER MONTH 500/- WHAN ANY PERSON DEPOSIT RS 5,000.
3. THEY ARE NOT AUTHORISED BROKER OF MCX.
4. HAY ARE COMMITTED AN OFFENC SUCH AS…
CHEATING (U/S 420 IPC),
CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST BY BROKER (U/S 409 IPC),
CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY (U/S 120B) &
SECTIONS 15,18,20,21 AND 21A OF THE FORWARD CONTRACTS (REGULATION) ACT, 1952.
ACTION OF THE POLICE
====================
THE POLICE HAS BEEN CHARGED U/S 420 IPC OF ONLY ONE ACCUSED & THEY ARE ALL 12 PERSONS APLLICATIONS MADE A SINGLE OFFENCE. BUT WE ARE INCLOSED DOCUMENTS & FACTS WITH OUR FIR APPLICATIONS IN POLICE STATION. POLICE WAS NOT INTERESTED TO FILED AGINST THAT ACCUSE.
OUR QUERY :-
=========
1. IS POSSIBLE TO 12 COMPLAIN IN SINGLE CASE?
2. ARE WE FILE COMPLAINS TO MEGISTRATE U/S 200 OF CRPC?
3. WHAT CAN WE DO THE BEST?
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
20 October 2009 at 22:46
Dear Sir,
The problem is that the lawyer was ill when the court of hearing was taken place at that time no body was present in court and the court imposed Rs 500 cost on Appellant. THe appellant is poor and can't able to pay this. SO how and what way I'll request to the court to cancel the cost imposed on client. What section and ruling will help in getting application for cancellation of cost.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
notice period in sec138
is it mandatory to send notice wthin 1 month from the cheque bounce intimation from the bank to the holder of cheque. if not sent wthin one month then what remedy available to the holder.