Rajesh Palande
17 October 2009 at 19:01
We had employed a driver, and dismissed him from service due to misbehavior with proprietor who is a lady. After few years the same man came and demanded Rs.7000/- which he claimed as unsettlled dues. He also signed on a promisory on 100/- non-judicial stamp paper mentioning that he would not harras any of family members, and he does not owe any dues with us. 3-4 days ago he stole 2 batterries and 2 car tape from buses owned by us. Police had formally arrested him recovered batterries. However the are not recording our complaint and have released him. Police say that we would catch him once they record our compliant. Every time we go to launch a complaint they avoid telling some or other reasons. We feel that police have co-operated till now by arresting him recovering the stolen batteries but why so delay in criminal proceedings. Please guide us what can be done in this.
Rajesh Palande
17 October 2009 at 18:59
We had employed a driver, and dismissed him from service due to misbehavior with proprietor who is a lady. After few years the same man came and demanded Rs.7000/- which he claimed as unsettlled dues. He also signed on a promisory on 100/- non-judicial stamp paper mentioning that he would not harras any of family members, and he does not owe any dues with us. 3-4 days ago he stole 2 batterries and 2 car tape from buses owned by us. Police had formally arrested him recovered batterries. However the are not recording our complaint and have released him. Police say that we would catch him once they record our compliant. Every time we go to launch a complaint they avoid telling some or other reasons. We feel that police have co-operated till now by arresting him recovering the stolen batteries but why so delay in criminal proceedings. Please guide us what can be done in this.
AC MAINI
17 October 2009 at 18:43
In the present electronic age Pl. tell me if the E mails exchanged between two conspirators are admissible as evidence.
Similarly in adultery whether recorded Telephone conversation having illicit relation talks can stand to prove the offence.
prakash vathore
17 October 2009 at 18:12
i want a draft of plaint for tresspass proccedings
ramjishyamji
17 October 2009 at 17:16
Accused issued post dated cheque as Chairman and managing director. against maturity of debentures.Before the due date he resigns.Consideration against MOU under which resigns not paid.
pls advise with favourable case laws
Shirley G e Fazal
17 October 2009 at 15:42
Sir, I wish to inquire whether the State Body such as the Coastal Regulatory Zone Authority
i.e C.R.Z or the Coastal Management Authority
of a state, ( eg.Kerala ),functioning comes under the jurisdiction of the Central Government or does it come under purview of the state .And if any corruption/fraud/collusion found in the functioning of this body or of the local authority/authorities could be referred to the Central vigilance commission if the state authority seem to be unwilling and unable to control the corruption? Kindly guide and assist.
Rishi Ahuja
17 October 2009 at 15:42
sir,
Could u please send be a copy olf the judgement of superem court on unclean hand.As other party has given a false and febricated declaration along with false affidavit, which was proved in the court and simulateniously criminal complaint was filed by me under sec. 200 and punishable u/s 193. All evidances have be recorded in the court and kept for consideration. Some time the said judgement may help me in this case, so accused should get the maximum punishment.
or adivce me if any other suitable judgement.
with regards
abdul rashid dulloo
17 October 2009 at 14:29
While making an assessment or re assessment u/s 147, the Assessing Officer, can not ask information u/s 143(2)so as to make an assessment of the nature of section 143' a regular assessment. In the case of section 147 assessment, the AO should know the amount of income which has escaped the assessment on the basis of information which has come to his notice rather than determining the income as if he is acting u/s 143. Am I right?
ROHIT
17 October 2009 at 11:55
can anybody proove that sales tax evasion is not a crime so that it should not be covered under i.p.c 420,465,468,471 wether tax is evaded by making fake bills and billties
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
POTA
Why was the POTA repealed ?