anshul sangal
08 November 2009 at 19:01
I am looking for training in Labour law. Is there any legal firm or company in delhi or NCR that provides training in labour law.
Ajjay
08 November 2009 at 18:41
I have a flat in a buliding where the society is not yet formed.
I want to sell the flat, But the builder in demanding Rs. 5Lacs for transfering the flat on the new owner's name.
What does the law says? Need help
Regards
Ajjay
Sanjay Kumar
08 November 2009 at 17:58
Can i get any judgment on section 379/411 IPC where the case property not produced in the Court?
avani.d
08 November 2009 at 17:42
hi,
this is avani and am from hyderabad.we deal in retail and have a store in hyderabad.recently there was a confrontation with one of the dealers in mumbai, as there was a misappropriation in accounts from his side.we put the issue in fron of market heads in mumbai and the dealer agrred he cheated upon with falsified accounts and apologised in front of all of them.there is no proof how ever, of any of the transactions either of the stock or of the money paid with him.but, we have papers in which the dealer agreed upon the payment in his oen handwriting.recently, the dealer came from mumbai to hyderabad with a complaint to the police that we have cheated them of money, and threatened him with calls which was absolutely wrong.the inspector of the local police station called us and as my husband was out of country, i went, and he denied showing me any documents regarding the same and started threatening me with dire consequences saying that the party had come with mumbai police.i was unable to understand how the police can call me without proof.and recently i have heard, that the police cannot involve in civil cases.is this correct.i have the recording of telephone conversations of the dealer, where in he admitted that he manipulated the accounts and cheated us.kindly advice.
avani.d
08 November 2009 at 17:40
hi,
this is avani and am from hyderabad.we deal in retail and have a store in hyderabad.recently there was a confrontation with one of the dealers in mumbai, as there was a misappropriation in accounts from his side.we put the issue in fron of market heads in mumbai and the dealer agrred he cheated upon with falsified accounts and apologised in front of all of them.there is no proof how ever, of any of the transactions either of the stock or of the money paid with him.but, we have papers in which the dealer agreed upon the payment in his oen handwriting.recently, the dealer came from mumbai to hyderabad with a complaint to the police that we have cheated them of money, and threatened him with calls which was absolutely wrong.the inspector of the local police station called us and as my husband was out of country, i went, and he denied showing me any documents regarding the same and started threatening me with dire consequences saying that the party had come with mumbai police.i was unable to understand how the police can call me without proof.and recently i have heard, that the police cannot involve in civil cases.is this correct.i have the recording of telephone conversations of the dealer, where in he admitted that he manipulated the accounts and cheated us.kindly advice.
umesh seth
08 November 2009 at 16:52
My grand father got expired in 2002. My grand father has only one son and one daughter.We were two brothers and one sister. My father has one -inimmovable propery. My elder brother got collapsed in car accident in 2004 My sisiter in law (deceased brother's wife)filed a suit against my father with regards to immovable property which he got from my grandfather without will with the purpose for seeking the partition of such property. My grand father did not execute the WILL for such property. My query is whether my sister-in-law (my deceased brother's wife)can claim in the ancestral property which my father got from my grandfather even when my father is alive.
Please answer with reference of the relevant act for partition or distribution of ancestral property.
S Ramanathan
08 November 2009 at 14:40
I took home loan from a NBFC. Tehy were hand in gloves with the builders. Did not inspect and made a bogus valuation report.
Now Municipality issued demolition order for 100% deviation in FSI. O.P says no violation was noticed during their inspection. Mine is a flat in third floor and if no violation found during inspection, it is not possible to build extra portions without edifice.Please advise if it amounts to deficiency in service.Can anybody advise me as to any precedent etc available. Thanks.
hage nibo
08 November 2009 at 14:30
My beauty parlour was tresspassed in a night and proerty worth rupees one lakh was either damaged or missing besides Rs 40,000/- in cash by a lady.FIR was lodged and the lady was arrested and chargesheeted under Sec 427 & 454.But the same day the lady was released on bail.Now, the question is how do I get compensated for damaged/missing property and cash of Rs 40,000/-, because the case would go on pulling for indefinite time.Kindly help me in this case to get my compensation as well as to put the lady behind the bar immediately.
Anonymous
08 November 2009 at 14:26
My beauty parlour was tresspassed in a night and proerty worth rupees one lakh was either damaged or missing besides Rs 40,000/- in cash by a lady.FIR was lodged and the lady was arrested and chargesheeted under Sec 427 & 454.But the same day the lady was released on bail.Now, the question is how do I get compensated for damaged/missing property and cash of Rs 40,000/-, because the case would go on pulling for indefinite time.Kindly help me in this case to get my compensation as well as to put the lady behind the bar immediately.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Validity of compromise decree after 12 years.
DHR/plaintiff and JDRs/Defendants filed a compromise petition in lower court. As per this compromise the JDRs are agreed to give some land to DHR and accordingly, the JDRS had handed over the physical possession of the land to the DHR and the same was recorded in the said compromise decree. And it is further recorded in the said compromise decree that “in case the JDRS fails to register the Sale Deed in favour of the DHR, the DHR at liberty to get the same executed through this court” the compromise was recorded in year 1990. But this compromise decree was not executed till today.
1. As the decree is time barred. who will be the owner of this land DHR OR JDRS.
2. Can DHR clam this property by any other means.
NOTE : Law of limitation only bars remedy, but does not extinguish the right.
what is meaning of above?