Anonymous
12 November 2009 at 20:42
i wish to know can a trading business is conerted into ltd.company format,if yes then what will procedure reqired
P.C. Joshi
12 November 2009 at 19:37
pls let me know whether a board meeting is required to be called by a company for taking on rec ord limited review report where the L.R. was conducted after publishing unaudited results.
From the reading of clause 41 I understand that taking on record of LR by the board is necessary only where there is variation of 10% or more in the net profit/loss.
Pls revert.
Regards
P.c. Joshi
R V SHASTRY
12 November 2009 at 19:36
Dear Sir/Madam,
Once I post a query where do I look for the answer? in my email?
anil
12 November 2009 at 19:10
hello,
i would like to know more abt the agricultural land reforms in karnatka.will a non agriculturist be laible to buy,for agricultural purpose.where can i refer to understand it better.what is the crime involved nd wht may happen in case i do so.
R V SHASTRY
12 November 2009 at 19:08
Dear Sir/Madam,
I would like to know whether Section 283 subsection (h)of Companies Act 1956 is applicable to a private limited company which is not a subsidary of a public limited company.
Thankyou.
Anonymous
12 November 2009 at 18:02
we are 3 brothers and 1 sister. all are married. 2 brothers work in my father's business and i work as manager in bangalore.i never joined family business.
now the problem is 2 brothers are fighting for the business property, both are working as salesman from past 16 years, my father/mother is alive and property is in my father's name.
the business is in loss and both the brothers wants their share.
1)if my father sells property shall i get some portion or only my 2 brothers will get share?
2)can my father alone can keep money?
3)my father says to my one of brother to leave business and to do some of his own, without any financial help, what he can do now?
4)house property is in my mother's name, and i dont live in that house, if my parents die without will, am i going to get my share
Anonymous
12 November 2009 at 17:50
My mother-in-law has purchased one acre of land in the year 2002 from a person (vendor's father's property) and the land was thereby registered and properly sale deed has been executed and the vendor children also endorsed their signature in the registered deed. Now the same person(vendor) sold the land in the month of August 2009 to some other parties(11 persons) with illegal document and it was registered. My mother-in-law have registered a complaint to the police and as well to the revenue authorities like thasildar, RDO and Collector. No action has been taken so far for the cancellation of the illegal registration. What has to do? Is there any immediate remedial action? If she make an appeal to court, then she has to spend lot of money by sending notice to 11 persons thro' advocate and how long the case will be on?
Meanwhile, the sisters of the vendor in order to rescue their brother from the trouble of second sale, claiming that they have share in their ancestral property after a long gap of seven years. The vendor's father who owned the property had passed away in the year 1995. The vendor sisters have served the notice claiming their share in spite of well knowing that the land has been sold in the year 2002.
Will you please suggest the remedy and how to be dealt?
Anonymous
12 November 2009 at 17:21
sir,after issuing priliminary notice by govt auctioneers is caveat is neccassary for mortgagee has to be obtained from court.is it possible of the mortgager to stop the sale of property. you please tell me the procedure followed in detail.step-by-step followed for 69 and 69A of TPA act in detail sir?
KRISHNASAMY.V
12 November 2009 at 17:19
respected sir, i am a chemistry professor working in the GOVT. Madras Medical College, Chennai.
i was in-charge of departmental library in a college and transferred to another college. during that period some books were found missing. for that i have been asked to pay the the cost of the books [ one lakh ] and double that cost as penalty [ two lakhs]. i told them that it is not fare as i was only in-charge and i did not took the books but i was someway responsible for the books missed . so i need not pay the penalty amount as charged from the students who actually takes books. still they did not accept my request.
in the meanwhile i sent my service book to that college for some entries in march 2009. my retirement was june 2009. still now they did not send my SR saying that only if i pay the amount including penalty, SR will be sent. so my pension was not fixed and i am unable to get the pension benefits of nearly 25 lakhs. even i am unable to get my salary from july 2009.
my question is " if a principal of the govt. college has the RIGHT to retain the SR of a professor who is going to retire, for not paying some amount to the govt. , when govt is in a position to pay the professor a huge amount which is so many times great to that amount ?
according to tamlnadu govt pension rules
"if a pensioner is found guilty of negligence causing pecuniary loss to the govt . during the period of service , the govt has power to order recovery from pension ,whole or part of such loss Rule 9(b). it should not exceed one third of the pension.[ Rule 9(5) G.O. 784 Fin.16.10.1971 . G.O. 702 FIN. 7.10.1988)LETTER 13755/92 - FIN. 20.02.1992
Mobile subscriber is consumer??
I have a bsnl (prepaid) connection.Iin Dec.08 it had tariff voucher and while making calls, i was overcharged. I filed a complaint in this regard. Dept. didnt take any action. I filed an RTI application for the action taken report on my complaint. In reply was provided with call details and was proved that i was over charged (as per tariff). Waited for another three months but position on ground remained the same. No action.
I filed a case in consumer forum. Now the lawyer (bsnl) has supplied a copy of decision : Lawyersclubindia Civil Law News : NO TELCOM DISPUTES IN CONSUMER COURT Lawyersclubindia - Interactive Platform for Lawyers & Indian Public, Legal Help, Legal Experts, Judiciary, Judgments, Judgements, Social Network for Lawyers, Legal Community, Law and General Manager, Telecom vs M. Krishnan &Amp; Anr on 1 September, 2009 and requested to Hon. forum to dismiss the case on these grounds as i have violated agreement between BSNL and consumer (me)
Point no. 9 on the second page (http://bsnl.co.in/forms/CAF_3G_PRE_PAID.pdf)
What can be done??
regards