M/S ABC (WHICH IS LICENSEE UNDDER ELECTRICITY ACT) HAS GIVEN CONTRACT TO EXECUTE THE SPECIFIC WORK TO SOME CONTRACTOR
THRES IS AN ACCIDENT ON SITE DUE TO WHICH CASE OF 304A HAS BEEN REGISTERED BY STATE
KINDLY TELL ME HOW MUCH M/S ABC COMPANY AND ITS EMPLOYEES ARE RESPONSIBLE
i have recieved arbitration awards. The jdrs were living under the jurisdiction of Addl. dist court. whether i have to file the e.p. for arrest before the Principal dist. judge or before the Addl. Dist. Judge. if so, transmition of e.p. is nessecerry or not.
hello friends,
i got a house in way of auction by successful bidding.they have executed sale deed in my name.i transferred all revenue records in my name but the auctioneers had not given me possession, so what is the procedure of getting possession?
Dear Friends,
pls suggest relevant citiation regarding grant of Maternity Leave.
is there any citation regarding the period of maternity leave.
thnks and rgds
Expert Panelists,
In certain documents, it is advisable to nominate some one, as in case of death of main person, the nominee gets the dues from bank/institutes if it is bank/institute account. But does he become owner of the fund? Or is he simply a care taker for the legal heirs of the deceased .
(1)what about immovable property? Does the nominee get any rights? Or he is a care taker.
(2)What is the difference between Proxy and Nominee?
(3) Is it that Proxy is able to take decision on behalf of main person?
(4) Can Nominee take decision on behalf of Nominator
(5) Are nominee and POA(power of Atorney)holder have same rights?
Sir, in maharashtra last month assambly election was finished.
in that election notification was published on 18/9/2009 and last date to filed nomination was 25/9/2009.
but after 25/9/2009 one voters supplimentry list was published in my vidhansabha sang.that list was published on 28/9/2009.4500 and more voters vote from that last list.
and my query is that ---
-- Weather that voter list is valid?
-- Is any ony from that last published list can get relif from court 'that he have not get the chance to contest election because election commession published that list after the last date of nomination?
-- Is the second runup candidate can filed a petition against election commession on this ground undrs representative of people act sec.23(3)?
Plese support me and answer me.
Sir, in maharashtra last month assambly election was finished.
in that election notification was published on 18/9/2009 and last date to filed nomination was 25/9/2009.
but after 25/9/2009 one voters supplimentry list was published in my vidhansabha sang.that list was published on 28/9/2009.4500 and more voters vote from that last list.
and my query is that ---
-- Weather that voter list is valid?
-- Is any ony from that last published list can get relif from court 'that he have not get the chance to contest election because election commession published that list after the last date of nomination?
-- Is the second runup candidate can filed a petition against election commession on this ground undrs representative of people act sec.23(3)?
Plese support me and answer me.
Dear Sir,
I want to have some clarifications regarding the above subject.
1. Whether is it possible to file a case under SC/ST Act,
Sec.3(1)(X)when an incident occurs in a private building? In the
recent judgement of Madras High Court it was stated that even if the
offence occurs inside before some friends and relatives it is enough
and there is public view which is an offence. Whether it is correct?
2. The Bombay High Court had given a judgement in Crl.W.P.No.2593/2008
(Mrs.Pushpa Vijay Bonde vs. MH state police) that the complainant
should have mentioned in his complaint had told the accused that he
belongs to SC/ST community and if there was no mention in his complaint
and deposition it was not an offence under Sec.3. It had cited the Apex
Court judgement Ashabai Machindra Adhagale's case. I want to get a copy
of the above Apex Court judgement. How can I get it?
3. SC/ST Rule 7(2) it is stated that the investigating officer should
complete the investigation within 30 days. As per records he had
obtained depositions from the Prosecution Witnesses on the next date of
FIR (26.02.2009), obtained the deposition from one PW (Tasildhar) on
05.07.2004 regarding the community of the accused and filed his charge
sheet in the JM-II court on 06.07.2004. The investigation conducted
beyond 30 days is against the said rule. Whether my contention is
correct?
4. In the statements of PW1-10 stated that A3 was the brother of A1, but PW11(DSP) in his statement noted A3 as the son of A1. This is wrong. Whether the charge sheet can be proved as false? Is there any ruling for it?
On 10.11.09 I have sent the queries 1-3, but they were neither found in the list nor answered.
I shall be thankful if my queries are answered.
MD ABDUL KADHER, TN
Registration with Bar Council of Delhi
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am a qualified Company Secretary. I came to know that practising CS(s), CA(s) can appear upto the level of trial court.
Can anyone please through some light on this issue?
Further, kindly advise what are the documents will be needed to get registered with the Bar council and the address of Bar Council of Delhi.
Looking forward for quick response.
Thanks & Regards,
Ratti Wahal, ACS