CHEEMOO
27 November 2009 at 17:37
Imran is in his flat in which flat he pushed her wife. Police arrest him from flat. The Honourable Judge saying that there is nobody in flat except Imran and Saima at the time of Incident and Imran accept it that he is in flat at the time of incident but he is sleeping.
The statement of Imran is that He is sleeping at the time of incident.
The police take money from accused and made statement in favour of accused. Accused is arrested from flat at the time of incident. But Police shows they arrested him in the night from the staris.
Police insist us to change our statement of arresting but we are going on true we dont change our statement.
Therefore, there is no good hope of wisdom from Police.
Saima hand written letters are availble with us in which she informed about threats from Imran that Imran killed her. She feel that Imran kill her.
We give these letters to Police but Police dont submit these letters in Court.
That my brother in law killed my sister by pushing her from 4th floor. There is no eyewitness of this incident. In the morning at about 5.45 a.m. chowkidar of the building knocked the door and informed us that some lady fallen down from the upper floor. Upon which I and my mother went downstairs and saw the saima was lying on the road in serious condition. On our query she very slowly and difficulty uttered the words as “Imran Dhakka” Mean while chowkidar had brought a vehicle. In the meanwhile I informed the police on phone as well as to my elder sister.
Please advised us there is no eyewitness how can we proof this murder? According to advocate there is no legs and foot bones broken. The hands and wrist bone broken due to Saima trying to safe her life from head injury. Please read this case and Postmortem report and advise us how can we proof this murder?
Please send us case law.
Deceased Saima was my real sister. Accused Imran was her husband. They were to residing in adjacent to our flat. Their marriage took place about 8 years prior to the date of incident of murder. The relation between the Spouse has become strained due to another girl namely Erum from the very start of the marriage. His behavior had become harsh and cruel towards my sister Saima. Before the incident the accused Imran had also issued threat of murder to my sister Saima. My another sister also moved application to the police station concerned for his cruel some behavior towards my sister Saima. I produced the photocopy of such application as Ex-26-A duly received by police station. On 20.12. 2008 a quarrel had taken place between Saima and Imran and Imran forced to Saima to obtained Khula from him as he intend to marry with Erum in case of divorce he had to give the dower (Mehar) amount to Saima. On hearing the commotion my mother went to the flat of Saima at about 3.00 a.m (night), and after sometime returned back. Thereafter 4.00 a.m.(night) Saima came to our flat and complaint about the quarrel with Imran, but my mother advised her to go to her flat and matter will be seen in the morning. In the morning at about 5.45 a.m. chowkidar of the building knocked the door and informed us that some lady fallen down from the upper floor. Upon which I and my mother went downstairs and saw the saima was lying on the road in serious condition. On our query she very slowly and difficulty uttered the words as “Imran Dhakka” Mean while chowkidar had brought a vehicle. In the meanwhile I informed the police on phone as well as to my elder sister. Who also came at the spot and we shifted Saima to hospital. My elder brother had also reached to the hospital and leaving him there we return back to our flat, where police is already available. I and police knocked the door of the Imran but he did not open the same. In the meantime my elder brother also came there and informed that Saima had expired. Imran came out of his flat and he was arrested by the police in my presence. Police prepared such mashirama of arrest which I acted as mashir. Then we went to hospital alongwith the police. Police inspected the dead body of the deceased and prepared such mashirnama so also inquest report to which I acted as mashir. Therefore we shifted the body to Hospital for Post-mortem and after the post-mortem the dead body was handed over to my brother in my presence. Statement of my mother was also recorded
FIR
That my daughter saima was married with Imran about 8 years. My daughter has no child. Often there were quarrels between my daughter and her husband. Today on 20.12.2008 at about 3 O clock in the night I went to my daughter flat in my neighbor and found that my daughter and her husband were quarreling. He was uttering that he would leave her and will get marry to Erum and if she further tease him he would push her down the flat. Then I went to my house. At about 4.30 my daughter came to me and told that her husband Imran has administered her some thing in water or tea, thereafter she needs sleeps hence I asked my daughter to go to her house and sleep then she went away. At 6 O’clock in the watchman knocked the door . I opened the door and watchman told me that a women has fell down and found that she was my daughter Saima. My daughter disclosed that Imran pushed her down. Peoples come around from their shops Milkman give the water to my daughter .and Then I took my daughter to Hospital but my daughter expired on the way. She than brought dead body of her daughter for Post-mortem. She alleged that her son in law killed her daughter by pushing her from 4th floor.
About three years priors to the incident an application was moved by the sister of deceased to police station
POST MORTERM:
The medical officer who conducted autopsy of the dead body of the deceased and found following injuries on person of deceased Saima on external Examination.
Female 33 years old. She was heavy built looking 5.6 feet height the body was fresh. Her rigor mortis are developing. Her features extent were identified. There was no sign of decomposition. Postmorterm lividity was present over back of the chest and trunk was not fixed. Her tung was inside the mouth. Pupils fixed dilated. There was no sign of oozing of blood or secretion from mouth, nose and ear. Surface wounds and injuries.
1- Her face was slightly cyanosed, nails and lips were also cyanosed.
2- Scratches on Arms and hands.
3- There was clinical fracture of right lower part of the forearm near wrist joint.
4- There were abrasion over front of the chest.
5- Bruse over left forearm ventral aspect.
6- Both hips are bruse size 10 x 7 left hip and 12 x 8 right.
7- Both Post aspects of both legs were brused.
On internal Examination the medical officer found the following:
Head : There was no visible injury over skull all skull on percussion all skull bones found intact.
Neck : Exploration reveals no visible mark of injury over neck. Skin subcutaneous and under line vascular. Muscular in structure intact. Hyoid bone thyroid cartilage and tracheal ring intact. Cartilage and tracheal ring intact. Cervical vertibornal found intact.
Time between injuries and death was instantaneous.
Time between death and post-mortem 4 to 6 hours.
The medical officer opined that the cause of death as acute hambragic shot and injury to the vital organ i.e. both lungs leading to cardio respiratory failure as result fall from fourth floor flat alleged.
THROAX: Examination exploration reveals collection of blood mixed with clots in the chest cavity. Both lungs were collapsed. Due to fracture of multiple of ribs of right side thoraz viz. fracture of upper part of sternum. Heard was normal in size and shape.
ABDOMEN: There was no collection of blood of fluid in the cavity and all structure were intact but pale.
SPINAL CORD: Intact
CHEEMOO
27 November 2009 at 17:24
My father (Plantiff) filed a benami suit against me Son (Defendant No. 1) in the April 2001. The year of purchase of property in March 1974. That the defendant No. 1 is the owner of the property which was purchased in the year 1974 from Cooperative Housing Society with the funds arranged by his late Uncle for the love and affection and wish of his late sister ( mother of defendant No. 1) as the said uncle was issueless till the time of his death. Age of Defendant No. 1 is twelve year at the time of purchase of property.
That after 22 days of the death of maternal uncle the plaintiff has applied with forged document for transfer of property in question before Defendant No. 2 ( Cooperative Housing Society ) after 27 years. The suit is time barred. The suit has been filed with malafide intentions and ulterior motives on the basis of forged documents.
That suit has been filed by father against me on the instigation of my sisters after the death of my maternal uncle.
Defendant No. 2
That no cause has to file the above suit against the defendant(s) for simple reason that no application / transfer form alongwith the affidavit was filed before the defendant No. 2 and that subsequently the defendant No. 1 is the actual party in whose name allotment of plot stand in the record defendant No. 2 as per written statement filed by the defendant No. 2.
Plaintiff is died of June 2007. The Presumptive legal Representatives of Plaintiff are two sons and four daughters.
Written statement of Defendant No. 2 ( Cooperative Housing Society)
1- That the date of birth of defendant No. 1 are not in the knowledge of answering defendant 2.
2- I t is however stated that the building plan was submitted by the Defendant No. 1.
3- The defendant No. 2 ( Cooperative Housing Society) did not receive any application for transfer of the property
4- That no cause has accrued to file the above case against this defendant for the simple reason that no application / transfer form along with affidavit was filed with the defendant and that subsequently the defendant No. 1 in whose name allotment of plot stands.
EVIDENCE:
1- That the decased Plantiff has failed to establish his case while the burden of proof is upon the plantiff. He has failed to establish that his income /salary was sufficient to purchase the property.
2- That the plantiff has not produced the declaration of assessments of assests for the year 1974 to 1979 in his evidence.
3- No Proof of evidence of Benami has been produced by the plantiff .The plaintiff failed to proof the Benami.
Know the case is on arguments stage. Please advise and suggestions for arguments Kindly supplement the reply with decided case laws.
Anonymous
27 November 2009 at 17:04
In this particular civil suit for partition wherein the Registration Department gave a false evidence. A 340 CrPC application has been made to the civil court showing the prima facie perjury, fraud etc. of the Registration Department.
The application was made by way of an interim affidavit. Though the Affidavit was taken on record no number was allocated to it. It has been 6 months since it is continuing so. But the court has taken the sworn statement of the petitioner who was the defendent in the civil suit.
Now the problem is the court is neither numbering the IA / passing order / or dismissing it. My advocate is getting vexed up by the behaviour of this court in this particular instance. What to do ?
Kindly help.
Anonymous
27 November 2009 at 16:30
I WANT SOME INFORMATION FROM DDA MCD POLICE AND COURTS. PLEASE TELL ME THE PROPER PROCEDURE TO FILE APPLICATION. WHERE WILL THE FEES IS DEPOSIT AND PIO SIT AND ETC
malashree
27 November 2009 at 15:56
In one of the Central Para-military Organization one official holding the rank of Inspector(Steno) Grade.II Group 'B' Non-Gazetted transfer prematurely to a lower post of Asstt.Sub-Inspector(Steno) Grade.III without his consent. The official's request to consider him to his appropriate post has been turned down and he has not option left except to seek justice from the court of law. Please clarify the following:-
1. Whether above said organization can transfer an official two ranks below his rank without his consent without valid grounds.
2. High Court and Supreme Court Judgements in this regard.
malashree
27 November 2009 at 15:48
In continuation to my above said subject querry. Please read 155.5 Sq.Yds instead of 1555.5 Sq.Yds and MCD circle rate Rs.27,300 per Sq.Mts insead of Sq.yds.
malashree
27 November 2009 at 15:41
The property is located in Delhi having built up three floors on 1555.5 Sq yds plot. The owner of the property died intestate leaving behind three legal heirs. The land cost of the property as per MCD circle rate meant for registration of property is Rs.27,300/- per Sq.yds which come total Rs.35,49,546/-- and the construction cost total come Rs.22,23,342/-. The grand total comes to Rs.57,72,888/-. Now one of the legal heir intend to file a partition suit. Please clarify the following:-
1. What would be the valuation of suit for partition for the purposes of fees and jurisdiction and whether this suit can be filed in a Dddl.District & Session Judge or District Judge court.
2. What the method for calculation of the pecuniary jurisdiction.
3. Whether and partition suit pending in the court can be rejected/returned under order 7 Rule 10 CPC being without pecuniary jurisdiction.
4. How the market value of the suit property is calculated and whether a partition suit can be rejected under order 7 Rule 11(b) CPC.
5. Whether I can decrease the valuation of suit property for filing partition suit.
harish
27 November 2009 at 14:56
why in her husband property second wife dont get her share and second wife is still alive
Anonymous
27 November 2009 at 14:36
my father died in 2005 and exceuted a registered will thereafter gpa and thereafter gifted the same property. All the property was gifted to my younger brother. We are six sisters and two brothers. please advice how I can challenge these documents in the court of law as these are executed without my knowledge.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
HUF Related
Dear Sir,
First of all, can anybody please tell me what are the different ways in which funds can be infused in a H.U.F?
Secondly, can a salaried individual, who is also the KARTA of the HUF infuse his part of his salary in the HUF? If so, what are the different tax benefits available in this case?