Anonymous
26 November 2009 at 23:59
Someone had given me a blank signed Stamp paper as sureity against a loan that I had extended. I want to check if this holds any strength if I need to initiate legal proceedings to recover my loan. Thanks
Anonymous
26 November 2009 at 22:58
Sub. Work relating to construction of cargo berth.
Dy. Chairman & CVO x port trust vide his letter dated --/07/08 had referred to the commission a case relating to the initiation of major penalty proceedings against the 5 officials.
Mr. A
Mr. B
Mr. C
Mr. D
Mr. E
The case was initiated on the basis of the observations of CAG on the work of construction of the cargo berth @ the cost of Rs. 40.98 Crore. The CAG has observed that the port Trust erroneously computed the amount of compensation for delay, thereby causing an undue benefit to the tune of Rs. 1.90 crore to the contractor. The commission, after perusing the report had observed that the commission’s 1st stage advice had not been obtained in this case. The commission, vide its O.M. of even no dated --/08/08 advised port trust to clarify the reasons for not obtaining the 1st stage advice and to expedite the inquiries and finalize the proceedings without delay. Port trust has furnished its reply, vide letter dated--/02/09
The commission has perused the report of port trust and has observed that there was a clear vigilance angle to the case and then chairman & FA&CAO had erred in not referring the case to the port trust Vigilance of the CVC. Now, the case as a composite case and furnish the complete proposals in respect of all officials for commission’s 2nd stage advice, as per the guidelines contained in the commission’s circulars no. -- dated -/-/06 and no. … , dated --/---08
The commission has also conveyed its displeasure to Sh. X the then chairman, port trust, since repatriated to his parent cadre, and Sh. Y the then FA & CAO. Port trust presently working in another port trust, for the failure to refer the case, having a clear vigilance angle, for the 1st stage advice of the commission, even through the official involved were covered under its jurisdiction..
Action taken by the Dept. may be intimated to the commission without undue delay.
my friend is Mr. Y will he can save him from any action taken by his dept.
Anonymous
26 November 2009 at 22:40
sir
as i got divorce notice kindly let me know as 498a is already going on,pl let me know what will happen if i don't go to divorce proceedings?
Anonymous
26 November 2009 at 22:12
RESPECTED SIR,
AS UNFORTUNATELY MY WIFE FILED 498A 406 & 34 IPC,WITH THE HELP OF POLICE OFFICIALS AT WOMEN CELL DELHI,AND NOW SHE HAS FILLED THE DIVORCE AT FAST TRACK COURT.
MY QUERY IS THAT WHAT SHOULD I DO
DO I NEED TO FIGHT 498A FIRST OR DIVORCE CASE
PLEASE GIVE ME SINCERE OPINION.
S. SAILAKSHMI
26 November 2009 at 22:07
My father had a flat at Anna Nagar. Three years before he had expired (No will has been written by him). I and my sister were only the legal heirs. I was living with my father along with my family (My husband and two small kids). TNEB bill, BSNL bill, etc were in the name of my father. My sister settled in Mysore after her marriage. She had one daughter. Till my father's death i myself take care of him (as he was a cancer patient). After my father's death, i and my sister thought of sharing the property equally. Though my sister is not willing to settle soon. Till now i am living in that house only. The TNEB bill, BSNL bill, Gas connection etc were in my father's name. At present my sister is not in a position to settle. What should i do to transfer atleast the EB bill, BSNL connection, Gas connection etc as they were a needy one. Can i keep it in my father's name itself till we were settling the dispute? Is it correct. Till now we were paying everything in my father's name only. Now due to frequent power cut, we were in need to change the EB supply to Three phase. The EB persons were requesting the name transfer. Is it possible for me to get the Name transfer without my sister's support. kindly clarify.
vargees amal raja
26 November 2009 at 21:33
what is "as is where is condition"?
Is there any decided cases challenging this condition or favoring the condition?
Is this condition valid?
Anonymous
26 November 2009 at 21:31
My father (Plantiff) filed a benami suit against me Son (Defendant No. 1) in the April 2001. The year of purchase of property in March 1974. That the defendant No. 1 is the owner of the property which was purchased in the year 1974 from Cooperative Housing Society with the funds arranged by his late Uncle for the love and affection and wish of his late sister ( mother of defendant No. 1) as the said uncle was issueless till the time of his death. Age of Defendant No. 1 is twelve year at the time of purchase of property.
That after 22 days of the death of maternal uncle the plaintiff has applied with forged document for transfer of property in question before Defendant No. 2 ( Cooperative Housing Society ) after 27 years. The suit is time barred. The suit has been filed with malafide intentions and ulterior motives on the basis of forged documents.
That suit has been filed by father against me on the instigation of my sisters after the death of my maternal uncle.
Defendant No. 2
That no cause has to file the above suit against the defendant(s) for simple reason that no application / transfer form alongwith the affidavit was filed before the defendant No. 2 and that subsequently the defendant No. 1 is the actual party in whose name allotment of plot stand in the record defendant No. 2 as per written statement filed by the defendant No. 2.
Plaintiff is died of June 2007. The Presumptive legal Representatives of Plaintiff are two sons and four daughters.
Written statement of Defendant No. 2 ( Cooperative Housing Society)
1- That the date of birth of defendant No. 1 are not in the knowledge of answering defendant 2.
2- I t is however stated that the building plan was submitted by the Defendant No. 1.
3- The defendant No. 2 ( Cooperative Housing Society) did not receive any application for transfer of the property
4- That no cause has accrued to file the above case against this defendant for the simple reason that no application / transfer form along with affidavit was filed with the defendant and that subsequently the defendant No. 1 in whose name allotment of plot stands.
EVIDENCE:
1- That the decased Plantiff has failed to establish his case while the burden of proof is upon the plantiff. He has failed to establish that his income /salary was sufficient to purchase the property.
2- That the plantiff has not produced the declaration of assessments of assests for the year 1974 to 1979 in his evidence.
3- No Proof of evidence of Benami has been produced by the plantiff .The plaintiff failed to proof the Benami.
Know the case is on arguments stage. Please advise and suggestions for arguments Kindly supplement the reply with decided case laws.
aisha
26 November 2009 at 21:16
As experts sugested in my previous qerryy "Your Husband and the other woman can be tried for pejury" . My husband gave false affidavit in high court n dist court , but the other lady gave false affidavit to my husband and further he submitted that in dist court.
Now my querry:
1 Both of them can be tried in one complaint
2 what is the jurisdiction for filing as false affidavits were filed at different courts at different places
3 can i file in high court / dist court
4 Is pejury different from contempt of court as i have moved one complaint in high court against my husband for filing false affidavits in highcourt. he has filed two affidavits in high court with different stand , one he says he is not married to me and married to other lady , 2nd he only married to me
Sunlawseeker
26 November 2009 at 20:57
Hai!
My friend has borrowed housing loan, he paid first 3 installments. Thereafter, he failed to pay more than 5 EMIs.
He wants to go for OTS (one time settlement).
Some people said that there is no OTS for housing loan.
Any one can help me.
thank you.
Sundaresan
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Income tax
Sir,
We want to sublet part of our property. For that we have to pay subletting charges to midc, can we deduct this charges while computing income from house property.
I also want to know that from his propery we are doing business and brokerage paid for renting of part property can be deducted from business income or from income from house property.
Can u advice and give any case reference.