Anonymous
15 December 2009 at 10:40
Hello,
I have filed a divorce petition against her. For which, she has given the application for maintenance under Section 24 HMA, which is as follows the main points are:-
1. That the petitioner is running his business in the name of M/s.************ at *******(address) and earning more then Rs. 1,00,000/- per month.
4. That the applicant is a housewife and does not earn anything being a domestic lady and is residing along with her parents thus needs at least Rs. 20,000/- to support her.
5. That to grant Rs. 22,000/- as litigation Expenses.
Some briefs facts are:-
1. I don't file Income tax return as I don't have this much earnings
2. I have taken a salary certificate from the employer(shop owner) for Rs.4000/- per month to prove my earnings
3. the girl has not attached any document/annexures to support her statement from which she can prove that I am in business and earning in lakhs (as claimed by her).
4.She is B.sc graduate, which she has not disclosed in her application. Means she has not come in the court with clean hands. Whereas, I can prove that she is B.sc graduate as I a documentry prove.
5. Now she is doing LLB final year for which she has paid Rs 60,000 fee.
6. Before marriage she was a working lady and earning around 7,000/- pm.(for this she has given in written in Income Tax Department also). I know all this but that is off-records.
7. At the time of Bail proceedings, I have given FDR for Rs.3,00,000/- as per the directions of high Court. In that order also the High court has advised her not to encash the FDR so that she can have regular income as maintainance. But she encash it the Next day.
Can I upload this point that she is having Rs. 3,00,000/- in her bank a/c and having the interest.
Plz. Help me
pawan sharma
15 December 2009 at 10:40
Pl, provid full coments on Art-233 of the contitutino of India.
ss
15 December 2009 at 10:23
Pl. clear doubts about the term value of the suit for the purpose of fees and prescribed court fees stamp. What is the exact meaning of these legal terms generally required in filing civil suits under CPC.
ss
15 December 2009 at 09:54
Please clarify the following points:-
1. What is the term that 'the suit filed by the plaintiff is barred by limitation?
2. Whether certain valid grounds is required mandatarily for application of the clause barred by limitation?
3. What is the rule of limitation application in various civil suits filed under CPC?
Anonymous
15 December 2009 at 09:03
Case filed under DVPC (domestic voilence act) by wife against husband who is drunkard and violent.Husband subsequently agrees to transfer all his property to his minor children with himself and his wife becoming minor guardians.Question is: under this act can a decree be obtained by the court to transfer property in minor childrens name by both parties filing a compromise to this effect.
Ganesh
15 December 2009 at 09:00
What are the essential conditions to be satisfied for a person to be charged under S307 IPC.
What is the significance of the MEdical report in this case.
Are the charges framed by the Investigating Officer final or could their validity be challenged.
How a IO comes to the conclusion that a particular act fits under the category of S307 of IPC.i.e. by his own wish and knowledge or does he require a strong evidence.
Ranjeet Singh chauhan
15 December 2009 at 05:09
Hi,
I am Ranjeet Singh from faridabad. One of my friend ask me to get him a computer hardware engineer as he was facing problem with his computer monitor. I recommeneded him my one contact person. Now after three days the computer tecnician get his monitor back to his house and alas the monitor was not showing even this display, Now he has made the monitor from bad (blurry image) to worse(no display at all).
Now I want to file law suite against him and need earnest suggestion from EXDPERT GROUP under which act and section I can file his complaint to District Consumer Despute Redressal Commission or State consumer Commission (haryana).
Will wait for your immedate response as per your warly convenience.
Thanks
Ranjeet Singh Chauhan
President, Social Empowerment & Welfare Association (faridabad)
Anonymous
15 December 2009 at 02:44
In a matter of dispute between the franchisee and franchisor according to the terms of agreement i referred a matter for arbitration to a senior advocate and he accepted through a letter of concent to arbitrate.
Before the Arbitration tribunal i filed vakalat and the otherside too filed a vakalat on behalf of the party. After one year of filing of vakalats and my persistent pressure the arbitrator concluded the enquiry.
Now more than one and half years have runby without his pronouncement of award. Later i came to know that the advocate on the opposite side and this arbitrator belong to same senior office. My insistence for pronouncement of award only gets back an untenable excuses from him like., typist didnt come, i am reading SC journal for this award etc etc.,
Now in light of delicacy involved in this issue i was hesitating to take any action. Now i decided to go further in the interests of my client. Plz advice me suitable action that i can take now.
I have my own ideas but i invite the advices from this forum since this is a professionally delicate issue but that matters the professional integrity by large in public. The conduct of this senior advocate reflects badly in the society affecting all of us who are in this profession. I expect an answer that would help me teach him a lesson. Thank You.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
S 33 of I D Act
Can an application of section 33 of Indutrial Disputes Act, be filed directly in the Labour Court.Pl,cited case law also