suresh
19 December 2009 at 17:02
my wife filed a case aginst me and my family in 498a before 2 months now they have again put a case in family court saying that they have given jewels and frm the court they have put notice around all my house for the claim and the hearing is on 22 this month ihave no idea can any body reply for that.
Rajesh
19 December 2009 at 16:37
In 1993 My father filed a suit against his nephews(Two brothers) for declaration that the ancestral suit properties belong to him and for other reliefs.In the above said suit, the defendants(My father's nephews) filed a memo submitting to decree and based on that the suit has been decreed favouring my father.
In 1998 my father died.
In 2002 My father's nephews(P1 &P2) filed a partition suit over the same properties against us (D1,D2 &D3) (my mother,My brother & me)on the ground that my father got the decree by playing fraud and they also have got the equal rights over the suit properties.
In 2003 one of My father's nephew (P1) died and his legal heirs were impleaded (wife & his three daughters)as Defendants (D4,D5 ,D6&D7).
During pendency of the suit, we have entered into a compromise and the same has been reduced into writing . We submitted the Memorandum of compromise in LOK ADALAT on 11.12.2009 and based on the compromise between us, the suit is about to be decreed. In the above said suit, major sons (2 sons & now both are major) of the 2nd (P2)plaintiff were not impleaded as parties.
Both of his sons were minors by the time my father filed the previous suitIn 1998.
One of his son was major by the time P2 filed the suit in 2002.
Now bothe are major.
Legal advice needed on
1. the litigation possibilities from (His major sons as they were not impleaded as parties}them in the future.
2. If there is any possibility of litigation, whether it could be rectified?
3.If so, how?
4.A registered consent deed from them will do?
Ravi.S.J.
19 December 2009 at 16:22
My client is a software compnay with a private limited status. Need to know what documents need to be submitted to get the registration under MSEMD Act., as a Micro/Small/Medium enterprises.
Chetan
19 December 2009 at 16:14
I obtained the docuements through Right to Information Act and intends to file in the court.
1) Whether it will be Secondary or Primary Evidence
2) How to Exhibit it ?
Pls provide any citation urgently...
Rajesh
19 December 2009 at 16:12
In 1993 My father filed a suit against his nephews(Two brothers) for declaration that the ancestral suit properties belong to him and for other reliefs.In the above said suit, the defendants(My father's nephews) filed a memo submitting to decree and based on that the suit has been decreed favouring my father.
In 1998 my father died.
In 2002 My father's nephews(P1 &P2) filed a partition suit over the same properties against us (D1,D2 &D3) (my mother,My brother & me)on the ground that my father got the decree by playing fraud and they also have got the equal rights over the suit properties.
In 2003 one of My father's nephew (P1) died and his legal heirs were impleaded (wife & his three daughters)as Defendants (D4,D5 ,D6&D7).
During pendency of the suit, we have entered into a compromise and the same has been reduced into writing . We submitted the Memorandum of compromise in LOK ADALAT on 11.12.2009 and based on the compromise between us, the suit is about to be decreed. In the above said suit, major sons (2 sons & now both are major) of the 2nd (P2)plaintiff were not impleaded as parties.
Both of his sons were minors by the time my father filed the previous suitIn 1998.
One of his son was major by the time P2 filed the suit in 2002.
Now bothe are major.
Legal advice needed on the litigation possibilities from (His major sons as they were not impleaded as parties}them in the future. If there is any possibility of litigation, whether it could be rectified? If so, how?
Ritesh
19 December 2009 at 16:03
A person was invited to a wedding party but he couldnt turn up. the party giver threw a big party inurring huge cost thinking that the person invited will be coming . Now can the party giver Sue the person who did not turn up????
Ritesh
19 December 2009 at 15:57
Moonless night.The alley was dark due to street lights not working .Rajeev was driving his car along the alley. Rohit was walking in the middle of the road. suddenly, Rajeev's car hit rohit and hurt him seriously.Can Rajeev be Sued????
Ritesh
19 December 2009 at 15:54
An illiterate man goes to buy medicines in a Medicine shop. The shopkeeper gives him the medicine which is expired due to which the man fall sicks . Can the man sue anyone ,if yes then whom?
AMAN
19 December 2009 at 15:39
Hi , I just want to know that if someone committed a crime under the above mention section 10 yrs ago but the complainant get the knowlage about the same crime 2 months before the present date , complainent has the title in the sold property can he file the fir against them after so many years by proving that he got the knowlage of the fraud 2 months before..
Thanking you ,
aman
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
section 138(cheque bounce of EMI)
My father is running a unit in textile industry.We have taken a Personal Loan worth Rs.10 lacs from different banks Now due to not having our repayment capacity the banks have issued the notice of Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act.Now my query is that as the personal loan does not cover any security so what can be the future consequences ? whether they can attach the property ?