Ashvin Khambhata
20 December 2009 at 10:39
Dear Sir
Wheather any govrenment circular can be exibited during criminal trial ?what is procedure to be followed?
deepak K Gujrati
20 December 2009 at 08:55
Can Department use information gathered from private sources against assessee
Anonymous
20 December 2009 at 07:43
Open agricultural land,tenant"T"(Entry is in the 'Akraman dhar'column, for a period of 10 yrs.)of the land; Sells( not through the Register document) the same to "X".Some how "X" manages in Tahsildar office to enter his name in the'Akraman dhar' column(period 1989-1991).
Tenant"T", dead long back.But the lands are in the position of Mr."X" even to day.
But all through these years(Even, As on today i.e.20-12-2009), the pattedhar(OWNER'S) column is carrying the name of actual pattedhar(but for the above period).
Can i approach the Land Grabbing Court for JUSTICE ? Am from state of A.P.
Same time Kindly elucidate me What is meant by:(1) TITLE (2)Ownership and (3)Lawful possession.
Thanking you all in advance with a request to respond at the earliest PLEASE!
Oibato Hage
20 December 2009 at 05:32
D/Frens,
Further what I would like to add is that all those posts which are not identified for me as per state govt. notification is identified for me as per central govt. notification, which I come to know later. So, should I challenge the state government notification ? since I am already a working JE and this post is also not identified for me as per state govt. notification. However, I was appointed before the state govt. notification was published.
Pls give some legal guidance....urgently !!!
which option should I prefer, to proceed ahead ???
Oibato Hage
20 December 2009 at 05:16
D/Frens,
I have a petition pending in the court regarding 3% job reservation for PH candidate in combined recruitment of AE (civil).
Recruitment was held for 18 posts of AEs under 5 departments.
Initially appointment in 18 posts was stalled by the court for outcome of my petition.
Later,due to the misc case filed by the 17 candidates , 17 posts were vacated by the court and 1 post was stalled for outcome of my petition.
Then, last candidate also filed misc case for vacation of last 1 post remained. However, court declined to vacate it on the ground that post meant for PH cannot be filled by non-PH candidate.
But later, the last candidate produced a State Govt. notification as per which the last 1 post stalled in given deptt. was not an identified post for my PH category. Accordingly, last post was also vacated by the court, but under condition that appointment in last post shall however be subjected to the outcome of my petition.
While having gone throug the said notification, I found that a post in one of the dept. was an identified post for my PH category. But, that particular dept. had requisitioned for only 1 post which was filled by non-PH candidate as and when 17 posts were vacated earlier.
This way, all the 18 posts are vacated by now. However, particular department, whose post was identified for me is yet to submit its reply for not keeping reservation for PH.
Now, while making enquiry,I got the recruitment rule and vacancy list of this particular department through the reliable sources, whereby it is stated that this dept. actually had 9 posts for direct recruitment. But what the dept. did was that it placed for requisition of only 1 posts in direct recruitment. And remaining 8 posts had already been filled by promotion and deputation prior to requisition for direct recruitment.
I have filed an RTI in this dept. seeking information about appointment made by direct recruitment as well as by promotion or deputation in the said posts for this particular period.
Please, suggest me how I should proceed by now. Can I bring this fact to the notice of the Court in instant petition? Or Do I need to file separate petition against the said dept. for violation of its recruitment rule?
Please help………
Parveen Kr. Aggarwal
20 December 2009 at 01:15
Whether there is any proposal pending before any authority/court for getting the evidence in the Indian Courts recorded by way of video recording?
Parveen Kr. Aggarwal
20 December 2009 at 01:09
I need latest case law on recording of evidence through Video-conferencing. I request you to help me in getting the latests Judgments on the point.
nagaraj
20 December 2009 at 00:42
A quash petition is preferred by the Husband before the High Court to quash thecharge sheet.offence committed by the Husband are U/s 498-A,506,34IPC &Sec.3 & 4 of Dowry ProhibitionAct.Husband and Wife are residing in U.S.after getting married in India in 2006.Unable to bear the harassment of Husband Wife sent a Specific power of Attorney to her father, who lodged a complaint against the Husband and his mother at Hyderabad.Based on the Complaint the matter was taken and a charge sheet is filed before the Magistrate by police.Husband and his mother were granted bail by High Court as the charge sheet is filed by the police before the lower court. Aggrieved, the Husband Preferred Crl.P before High Court for stay of all further proceedings including arrest. High court granted Interim stay of proceedings for 4 weeks. What is the best defence which the wife can take before the High Court to struck off the quash petition. Pl.advise.
Anonymous
19 December 2009 at 23:02
Two items of ancestral immovable properties were devolved upon three sons. They have been in joint possession and enjoyment of the same without effecting partition. All the three sons intend to sell away above said three properties for the reasons that they are not getting sufficient income from the said properites. whether the proposed purchaser can obtain sale deed without making their major and minor children as parties to the sale deeds to be executed and registered.
please give opinion if there is (no)legal necessity
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Writ against Income Tax Department
Hello,
I had filed several RTI applications to the income tax department to supply the "Complete Investigation Report" connected with my complaint against my in-laws.
For this, I have given the references of various judgements/citations of Hon'ble CIC and High court of Delhi.
But the PIO and First Appeal Authority are keep on neglecting/disobeying those judegements/citations.
Now, I have filed the appeal before the Central Information Commission(CIC), but it will take around 1 year to process and to come up for hearing. In this due time, it might be possible that I might be punished by court and any thing can happen.
i want to prove myself innocent in 498a case filed against me.
***] Plz. suggest me if I can file a WRIT PETITION at High court and make prayer to the Hon'ble court to direct the income tax depatment to disclose the "Investigation Report". Or I have to wait 1 year to check the decision of CIC.
***] Actually I want to file a WRIT Petition before the decision held by CIC.
***] It might be possible that High court might ask the question "why did you not wait for the decision for CIC and direct come to High court? Then please suggest me , what should be my defense"
Thankx