vinod kumar
02 January 2010 at 16:04
Sir,
I want to know if decree is given immediately after the completion of six months mandatory separation period or can divorce be given before completion of statutory 6 months period as i am in my 4 th month of statutory period
Sumir
02 January 2010 at 15:18
I had filed RTI to get audit report of a body/organization/association (name can't be revealed), and got the report dated 12 April 08. I then met with ex manager of the body who told me that the audit involved malpractice, and showed me letter of auditor dated 16th April 08, that he can’t audit the account since it does not have bills; now my question is can I use the letter as evidence; what if both sender (auditor), and receiver (the chairman of body) both denies that the letter is authentic, and that it is a forged document since both are involved in malpractice; i.e. in other words how does the authenticity of signature be checked.
Mahendra
02 January 2010 at 15:12
1 My Grand mother (Tanubai) is 80 years of age has three sons
2 My Elder uncle (Vitthal)
3 My Second Elder uncle (Tukaram)
4 My Father (mahadeo)
My Grand Mother has piece of land at mahabaleswar
My elder uncle going to cheat us by my preparing a will and trying to take all her properties on his name under coercion . he took grandmother to his home since last six month and & does not let her go out side his home
I understand from the other sources that there is a strong chances of preparing a will without informing us
1 )What are the remedies available to others ?(at the least expense)
2) what preventive action we cant take so as to stop him doing a will ?
Should is send a notice to him or suggest me any other action to prevent him
Thanks in advance
Mahendra
Son of Mr Mahadeo
Anonymous
02 January 2010 at 14:58
A BROKER APPROACHED US THAT HE WOULD ARRANGE FOR SALE OF HOUSE. HE COULD NOT DO SO. ONE DAY ANOTHER PERSON BROUGHT A PROSPECTIVE BUYER. AT THAT TIME THIS BROKER HAPPENED TO BE THERE. HE ASCERTAINED ALL THE DETAILS AND NOW ISSUED US A LEGAL NOTICE ASKING TO PAY COMMISSION FOR ARRANGING THE BUYER. IN FACT HE HAS NOT DONE ANYTHING. HE CLAIMS HE ARRANGED MEETING WITH BUYER AND FIXED THE PRICE ETC. WHICH HE NEVER DONE. BUT SERVED THE NOTICE THREATENING THAT HE WILL INITITATE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL BREACH OF CONTRACT IN THE COURT. NO WRITTEN AGREEMENT WAS ENTERED INTO AND ORALLY WE ASKED HIM TO ARRANGE FOR SALE OF HOUSE.
NOW PLEASE LET ME KNOW THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE LEGAL NOTICE. ARE WE LIABLE UNDER CIVIL AND CRIMINAL FOR NO FAULT OF OURS? AND FOR NO EFFORT OF THE BROKER, DO WE HAVE TO PAY COMMISSION?
PL ENLIGHTEN AT THE EARLIEST.
THANKS
smitha
02 January 2010 at 14:03
i want to know whether my husband can get a loan from a nationalised bank for a property that is registered in both our names.i am non working.
Anonymous
02 January 2010 at 13:51
Mr XY has been filed upon with an FIR u/s 409 IPC, without enclosing any evidences relevante to the complaint. FIR has not been signed by complainant on lodging the complaint. Conditional Bail has been granted with with provision of two sureties and got released on surrender-cum-arrest. FIR is of 5 months old. No investigation commenced by IO/SHO, but the accused is under suspension of service. Employer kept quiet, without furnishing any evidence till now, even after given the bail is granted to the accused and not initiated institutional enquiry. Employer has seperate set of instructions/rules, i.e., outcome of chargesheet of IO/SHO is irrelevant for them. What is the recourse
Anonymous
02 January 2010 at 13:48
Mr XY has been filed upon with an FIR u/s 409 IPC without enclosing any evidences relevante to the complaint. FIR has not been signed by complainant on lodging the complaint. Conditional Bail has been granted with with provision of two sureties and got released on surrender-cum-arrest. FIR is of 5 months old. No investigation commenced by IO/SHO, but the accused is under suspension of service. Employer kept quiet, without furnishing any evidence till now, even after given the bail is granted to the accused and not initiated institutional enquiry. Employer has seperate set of instructions/rules, i.e., outcome of chargesheet of IO/SHO is irrelevant for them. What is the recourse?
supreme court ipc 420,468,471 and 120 b