Anonymous
10 January 2010 at 12:51
I have purchased a property( land ) with the finance from a bank after varifing all the documents & search report .few months later a relative of old owner filed a suite of T.I.against me stating that a partition suit including this property is pending in lower court since 1998 & he also has share in this property.
he asked the court 1) to decleare this sale deed ab initio void
2) not to demolish old construction & not to allow new one
3) not to transfer this property .
After varyfying all the documents, court has said that, there is no primafacee evidence showing plaintiffs share in this property .also just because the partition which took place in 1992 was oral partition,other entries in the govt record should not be neglected . Also the partition was accepted by plaintiff's father & was entered in govt revinew record.
court has ordered that 1)I can demolish old building & start new construction on the said land
2) I should not transfer the property.
3) I should give undertaking that if at all the final decision goes in plaintiff's favour,I will demolish my construction & bring back to original one.
This order is till the final decision of the suit & not intrim
As said earlier the land is mortgage with bank since purchase.I have taken permission from local govt authority for construction.bank is ready to finance me.
My query is-
1) Do i need to take permission from court to increase the loan or mortgage ?
2)will that be contempt of court otherwise?
3)As mortgage comes under transfer of property,what difference is between mortgage & transfer of property?
4) will court allow me to increase mortgage?
Anonymous
10 January 2010 at 11:41
wheather a next friend can apply for guaurdianship, when the mother or grand mother of the minors are deceased, further the natural father and other relatives are alive
Anonymous
10 January 2010 at 11:18
Sir,
if any person(MAJOR IN AGE) is charged u/s-366 of IPC as a first offender. can he or she be released on probation of good conduct.
if the answer is yes,
Than please tell me in which situation he or she will be released.
And the judgment related to the Supporting the answer.
Gurcharn Goyal Advocate,Sirsa(HR)
e-mail-gurcharn_goyal78@yahoo.co.in
gurcharngoyal78@gmail.com
Aditya R khandelwal
10 January 2010 at 09:11
Wel me and my Father purchased a Land in 1991....After that i made a construction of Two floors....Wel we take the Registered Sell agreement in favour of My dad and Power Of attorney In favour of me..... Till date both My Dad and Previous Owner who sell the Land to us is Alive.
My question:-
#1 Can i make a "Registered Sell agreement" in favour of my wife with the Power of attorney? If yes....
#2 Can she sell the Land in future with the "Registered Sale agreement" and make the land Registered in some other PArty if my father Dies?
#3 If My Dad dies will i be able to Sell the Land with the help of "Power of Attorney" as i get this Power from Previous owner and not from My Dad,
Anonymous
10 January 2010 at 01:28
Respected sir,
My passport was issued from Patna office of Bihar in 1999. I am living at Jharkhand, which was Bihar then. Now it has been expired. There is no change of address. From where(Bihar i.e. Patna Office or Jharkhand i.e. Ranchi office) it will get renewed? what is the procedure of renewal? Thanks to all.
suresh jakhotiya
10 January 2010 at 00:45
Dear Sirs
A,B,C &D (4) persons guaranteed a CC limit against hypothication for 9.90 lacs in 1989.
D withdrew immediately within 10 months of signing the guarantee from company.
Bank then enhanced the limt to 18 lacs in 1992 with guarantee from A,B,C of the old and a new guarantor E. Admittedly D did not sign this .
Company went NPA shortly and Bank took hypothicated goods worth 12 lacs in possetion & filed suit against all GuarantorsA,B,C,D &E (5) guarantors for Rs 22 lacs with interest.Defendents included D ,the one who signed for 9.90 lacs.
Court held that D is responsible upto 9.90 lacs only.
12 lacs value of goods in possession of bank be appropriated for all the defenders and decree for 10 lacs (the balance) was passed against all (5)A,B,C,D & E saying that Balance after Set off is equal to the sum guranteed by D also
Sir, My question is whether any case law or Citation can support my thinking that while appropriating 12 Lacs,court should have satisfied the first limit of 9.90 lacs & then the balance against Enhanced limit. and D should have been deemed to have satisfied his Guarantee of 9.90 lacs.
Pl. provide some Case Laws /Citations & suggest How D should proceed as he can not go in appeal to DRAT for his inabilty to make a deposit.
Thanks & best Regards
Suresh
Anonymous
10 January 2010 at 00:22
what is the difference between INAM VILLAGE AND INAM ESTATE'S.
bvlnckumar@gmail.com.
Parveen Kr. Aggarwal
10 January 2010 at 00:19
When a bank returns a cheque dishonoured for the reason "Title of Accounts required", what the bank actually means?
Anonymous
09 January 2010 at 23:15
can anybody send me the judgement of rajastan high court who has passed the decree in favor of the husband and denied the maintainance whose wife has left the job for seeking maintainance. this is needed on urgent basis.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
IS Mr. President the real CEO of our country?
Our country is a republic and president is the chief.our constitution provide enormous power to president,if we read between the lines.Then why PM runs the govt?Is there any specific article mentioning the power of PM and its responsibilities to run the country?