the prosecutrix says that she allowed sexual intercourse because male partner assured her and give promise that he would marry with her. then male partner says "no"
Female is age of 20 yrs and male partner is 22 years and both are from different communities.she says that she gave a consent because of that promise. whether offence of i.p.c.376 is preprepared? what is the impact of section 90 of i.p.c.? it means consent
deepak
28 February 2010 at 19:55
civil judge senior div. of district court gives order in favor of plaintiff for his share in property. is plaintiff require to file a caveat in high court? so that the high court Issue notice to plaintiff in the event of any suit/petition/application made by the respondent or any other who bought the suit property from the respondent while proceeding of the suit seeking any injunction/attachment/relief orders etc.
mahendrakumar
28 February 2010 at 19:47
can any court including the supreme court interfere in the proceedings of a consumer case at a consumer court before the final verdict by the concerned court?
If so on what situation?
Anonymous
28 February 2010 at 18:21
Is it possible to appoint a director with no investment in a new or existing company?
if no then:
Except investment on what basis can a person be eligible for a director of a Pvt Ltd company?
I would like to draw attention to the recent act of misconduct by the typist of the warangal cout by throwing the footware on the honourable judge in the court. I would like to know what action would be taken by the authorities concerned.
Anonymous
28 February 2010 at 18:01
I have joined a software pvt company in chennai in Aug 2008
I have three questions.
1) My company has backtracked from the offer letter uni-laterally and forced me to sign on a appointment letter (40 days after joining the company)
2) They are now refusing to pay me proper CTC & when I protested that they have asked me to leave with notice / notice pay
3) They are not paying me PF inspite having a staff strength of more than 20 permanent employees
what is the solution and whom do i approach for a solution
Suresh
SAJAN ANTONY N.
28 February 2010 at 17:48
suit is for injuction aginst the forceful eviction from the rented building. status quo was ordered. meanwhile the ownership of the building changed. the new owner demolished the building. he was impleeded.whether the prosecution i.a. has an indepedant existance, because the relief of the suit is no more ie. the building.
sir, aap logo dvara di gayi purva jankari ke liye dhanyavad, suchana ke adhikar ke antargat bank ya income tax officer ko kitne din main jankari deni padegi,yadi vah jankari dene se mana karta hai to kaha jaau
Member (Account Deleted)
28 February 2010 at 16:54
138n.i.act,produce photocopy only ledger
138 n.i.act ke vad main ek dukandar ne case kiya hai ki usne alag alag billo main,mal becha,jisme final hisab kar use 90000 ka chek mila, usne cross main bill book,ledger book,recipt book va income tax return file karna accept kiya,kintu parivad ke sath keval ledger ki photo copy file kari, ledger ka hisab bhi 90405 ka hai, 405 ka koi jikra nahi, my question......... kya usse 91 ka aavedan dekar mool ledger,bill book, receipt book ki mang ki jave, ya na kiya jave,.......... yadi vah proper book khud nahi pesh karege to accused ko kya benifit hai