Anonymous
07 April 2010 at 17:52
If a person made a WILL, distributed his ancestors property in Villege (Land etc) to his Sons and his self earned house and other property in mumbai transfered to his daughter.
Whether his Sons are correct to clam for the property of mumbai which is self earned by their father. (HINDU LAW and PROPERTY LAW)
Whether Daughter has no right on property in Mumbai(house etc) which is transferred by her father by WILL. (HINDU LAW and PROPERTY LAW).
Whether WILL is enough for possession of house or property (self earned).
Anonymous
07 April 2010 at 17:09
Dear Experts
We all indians always saying Hindu-Muslim-Sikh-Isai Ek hai.....
Then way we have differant laws for differant cumunity.
do you dont think it will dividing metality towards each other religion.
Whts your opition
Jaswinder Singh
07 April 2010 at 15:08
A,B,C filed a suit for declaration against D (brother) and E(father) that all plntiffs and defs. are owners of 1/6 share of property owned by father E. father E expired during pendency of suit. During life time executed a Gift deed and WILL in favour of son D and disowned plaintiffs A,B,C. But in suit or written statement, no mention of Gift Deed or WILL.
Now after the death of father/Defendant D, what should I do. I have to move application for amendment or anything else.
Anonymous
07 April 2010 at 15:07
Suppose If I filed a writ petition on Government Department (i.e Registrar of Firms Punjab) at Chandigarh, so what is the total time period till the final Judgement.Or is there any alternate for quick decision???
Advocate.S.A.Siddiq
07 April 2010 at 15:01
In Negotiable Instument act sec 138, case filed. accused not present before the court, the court declared proclaimed offender, properties of accused are not attached, in this position , can we get exparte order from court? ( with the punishment order u/s 174A IPC ) Please explain my dear experts...
Kumar Doab
07 April 2010 at 14:52
Kindly advice what all can be done.
A is a Manager with a Life Insurance Company.
His bosses wanted to trap him in a case of malpractices, and to end his employment and also to blackmail him so that he does not sue the company legally.
The sale of Insurance Policies of the company has been low for almost one year in all branches for all Managers, and the bosses were exercising pressure to fetch business by any means or resign or face termination of service.
The insurance agent sources the policies from the clients and the client has to fill up and sign the proposal form, and has to provide self attested proofs of his identity, address, date of birth, photo, payment by cheque/DD/cash etc. The original documents of the client are to be seen by the agent or mangers of the company, and on the self attested photocopies they have to record that the originals are seen and verified by them.
First insurance agent, then A checks the file to ensure that all process of the company are followed, then the PA of Branch Manager and then the Operations staff of the company checks the file of the client, and the checking by Operations staff, in the branch is final, and if they find any lapse they send it back to sales staff i.e. Manager and agent, and when they find it OK, they send it to HO of company for the issue of Insurance company.
In one case A received one file back from Operations Staff with some objections to clear, and A finds that he has never submitted this file, and that his signatures ( his usual initials) are forged, agent's sign are forged and in fact this agent after getting licensed, immigrated to foreign country and never submitted any business, the photo- voter card- phone number-address-of the client is fake, the cheque of the customer is fake ( and later on enquiry from the bank it was found the cheque is of Dead Bank account owned by PA of the Branch Manager). A found that this was done to trap him and the handwriting on Proposal form, cheque, and other docs is of PA and BM.
One day before A was informed that he has been terminated.
A took away the file and later gave a copy of all docs in file to Zonal HR Head, Boss of BM, with verbal complaint. Nothing happened. Company has recorded the file has not come back from sales.
The issue is about 6 months old.
Anonymous
07 April 2010 at 14:20
I bought a commercial office building, where my company was and still is, a tenant, under Sarfaesi Act 2002 at a bank foreclosure auction. After a 2 year legal battle (appeals upto SC by the borrower/Owner and again at DRT) the title was vested in me. I managed to throw the Owner/borrower out. But a pre-exisiting commercial tenant (actually two companies under same proprietor) refuses to vacate, has not been paying the pre-existing rent etc.).
My attorney filed 2 cases for eviction under the Rent Control courts, against the 2 companies. Almost 2 years later, it still has not come to trial, while the tenant continues to enjoy the property rent free.
Could this have been filed any where else other than the Rent Control ? I am told that this should have been easy and quick and should have been filed in HC, due to purchase under Sarfaesi? Even if I get the eviction order from Rent control (or HC), I am told that this can go onto appeal? The tenant is hard to work with. Answers & advise?
mukesh
07 April 2010 at 14:19
Dear Sir,
One of my friend travelled by Howrah Express on 15 th feb 2010from vadodara to Jharsuguda with two other family mambers. He booked online e- ticket with irctc. During traveling he didn't have valid i card as prescibed by IRCTC. Although he had a photo i card provided by His bank SBI. He also had a xerox copy of Driving licence. TC fined him Rs. 5130/- gave him a excess fare ticket receipt. In the receipt Tc wrote two different figgers Rs. 3740+Rs. 1390. TC informed him that Rs.3740 will be refunded to him after some time. He will have to apply for the refund. My friend applied but till date he hasn't got his refund.Please guide me how can he get it back?
Anonymous
07 April 2010 at 13:52
Respected Experts,
I am herewith submitting a querry for your opinion. The query is:
“A” is the elder brother of “B”. Both of them have purchased some lands and paid sale amount jointly. But an Agreement of Sale cum General Power of Attorney was duly executed and registered in the name of “A”, since “B” was not available at the time of registration of the document. Due to faith and confidence on A, B has accepted the said transaction. Subsequently, when “B” is demanded to allot his half of the said land, “A” is refused to allot the same.
To strengthen the case of “B”, I hereby giving the following points.
1. Some part payment made through a Banker’s Cheque to the vendors. {Actually the said Banker’s Cheque has been taken by B through his bank account.}
2. Some Cash payment also made. {To prove the same, bank entry is also there in the bank statement of B.}
Even though the above payments are acknowledged by the Vendors, it was salient that the above payments are made by “B”. As a matter of fact, B’s name was not at all mentioned in the said registered document.
Hence at this juncture, can “B” file a suit against “A” for recovery of his half of the land. Plz. clarify
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Writ Petition
) A registered partnership firm at will has a 4 partners, 2 partners reside at Amritsar
and other 2 in Mumbai. Now one of the partner reside in Mumbai has dissolves the firm
by his dissolution notice sent to all partners. Now the two partners who reside
in Amritsar on the same day made a forged Deed stating that the other two partners
of the firm has withdrawn from the Firm by their public notice in two newspaper
and now the firm has only two partners. And they have also made a false entry
with the Registrar of firms with out showing the retirement deed and the Registrar
in connivance with them (without asking the retirement Deed or Dissolution Deed
remove the name of other two partners who resides in Mumbai). When the partners
of Mumbai came
to know the same they had filed a protest entry with the Registrar of Firm.
Now the question Shall I file a writ petition on Registrar of Firm ?
If yes then what is the time period for the verdict?