is it necessary to get signatures of mortgagee on mortgage deed.
Rajini Sunderraj
07 April 2010 at 22:08
Thank you Sirs,
Sri. Raj Kumar Makkad and
Sri Shivahari Mundhe.
I am not holding several posts but My husband is the President of several NGO's with different names but with almost the same Memorandum and Bye Laws.
Is he eligible to hold or should he quit.
Pl clarify
Mrs.Rajini
Anonymous
07 April 2010 at 22:02
I want to know whether exam date have been postpone of 3rd & 4th sem of 2nd year 3yrs llb plz its urgent
Anonymous
07 April 2010 at 21:22
i have seperated from husband it's 2yrs know. we have 2yrs baby, but till today there is no phone or he can't ask about our daughter how is she. is it a possible that this is 1 reason to get divorce from him.
rahul k
07 April 2010 at 21:00
Why do lawyers usually start a law firm and not a company that can provide the same assistance that a firm does? Is something to do with representing clients in the courtroom? Company usually has more advantages when compared to the firms in terms of liablity etc, but still we have top law firms like amarchand mangaldas, AZB etc but not a single company that performs similar functions that these law firms provide, why?
Anonymous
07 April 2010 at 19:35
I had issued stop payment instructions on a cheque issued by me. Without sending me a notice as required by Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, I have received a summon from Metropolitan Magistrate, 10th Court, Andheri, Mumbai asking me to appear in person before 20th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai.
The letter has been posted at Girgaum Post Office and the complaint enclosed is not signed and the papers are not complete.
I would like to know the following:
1. Can Metropolitan Magistrate of 10th Court, Andheri ask me in person to appear before Metropolitan Magistrate of 20th Court, Mazgaon.
2. Why is the letter posted from Girgaum Post Office as the sender is Metropolitan Magistrate, Andheri
3. Why is the complaint not signed and all relevant papers not enclosed?
Please advise me as to what action I should take as I have not been issued a notice as required by Section 138
Anonymous
07 April 2010 at 19:33
i had paid advance to purchase land but the agreement is not being fulfilled by the other side. can i file a money recovery suit instead of specific performance? thanks
radha
07 April 2010 at 18:30
Mr. Abbey has been terminated from his service by a Pvt Insurance company from the post of Manager, without assigning any reason.He was made to answer many of emails regarding his low performance.
He was issued a show cause notice, to which he replied and explained, and asked the company to withdraw the show cause notice,and the company did ot withdraw the show cause notice and no persuant action was taken by company.
Mr. Abbey want to challenge his termination and wants to inspect his personnel file maintained at the HR deptt at Head Office of his company.
Can he claim the inspection as a matter of right?
Is the company under obligation to show him his personeel file? can the company refuse for this?
Can he later amke the company bring is personnel file to court?
What are the options available to him.
Kindly advoce.
Anonymous
07 April 2010 at 18:19
unregistered orignal partnership deed need to be notorised?
We have submitted Importer exporter code no
application to dgft for modification, but they raised following querry
" Pl submit copy of notarised partnership
deed "
EXTENDING TIME OR SQUASH PROCEEDINGS INCOMPROMISE CASE
My aunty being the defendant in a civil case for injunction got the stay vacated and simultaneously filed a eviction suit against the tenant.
In this stage both parties agreed to mutually settle the issue and filed a compromise petition in the court. My aunt promised to with draw a criminal case filed u/sec 324 against the tenant.
The Hon'ble court had refered the matter to lok adalat and gave 1 year time to settle it in the lok adalat.
The problem is that the tenants have not approached my aunt and she in turn did not approach them so it was kept pending with out beinbg settled as per the compromise deed.
Aunt's tenants are ready to still proceed as per the compromise deed but the Hon'ble court refering it to the lok adalat has granted time. Lok adalat has in turn rejected saying that there is an amendment to the existing law and IPC 324 cannot be compromised in this court.
What should she do now?
Go for squash proceeding in the High court or else?......
Can you guide my aunt under what sec or provisions she should approach the appropriate court to make the compromise applicable.
URGENT SIR.
Thanks