Anonymous
12 April 2010 at 23:46
Hi,
The Maharashtra goverment has come up with the new 1% VAT taxation for all the Flats Registration done on or after 1st April 2010. My query is before 1st April 2010, did the taxes for the sale of the Flats were borne by the builder? If yes what was the tax percentage? and also why the 1% VAT tax has now to be borne by the buyer? I am asking this question, because recently i did my flat registration and the builder has asked for the 1% VAT check in the name of the builder. Also my registration was supposed to happen on 26th March 2010, but the builder delayed it intentionally and pushed it to 9th April 2010. My query is by postponing my flat registration, does the builder gain in any way? for i know i am at loss as i have to now pay extra 1% VAT on the sale agreement amount.
Your prompt response would be greatley appreciated.
Thanks.
Manjulehh Tripathi
12 April 2010 at 23:25
Hi,
This is manjulesh tripathi, this is my first query.
I helped a person, by giving him about 2.11 laks in various installments.I have a written agreement from him (on 100 Re Stamp paper) stating that, he has borrowed 2.11 lakhs from me and issued one cheque for the same amount in 2008. in the agreement, he has mentioned that he will repay the amount within 24 months. now he is refusing to even acknowledge the agreement and has told me that i have forged the agreement and the cheque. He is now refusing to pay the money back.
my question is:-
1. Should I bank the cheque and take him to court from there on.
2. Is the agreement valid.
3. What is the recourse available to me to recover the amount.
please help.
Anonymous
12 April 2010 at 22:54
Can we move to the High Court under Article 226 for issuing a direction to the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority(IRDA)to cancel the regulation license of an Insurer, if the IRDA is not taking any action on the representation of an policy holder? Can High Court issue a mandamus & what would be the place for filing the Writ Petition?
Anonymous
12 April 2010 at 22:19
Sirs,
Pl let me know whethter an immoveable property can be sold before the mortagage is released by the financing bank or Co., ir Instution.
The loan money is cleared to the last pie.
Thanks
Anonymous
12 April 2010 at 21:31
Que.1.Can an Agent be appointment on behalf of Petitioner in the middle of the Proceeding after some Hearings are Over?
allurisivajiraju
12 April 2010 at 20:52
Respected Seniors,
Two brothers namely X &Y jointly purchased a property. It is purely self acquired property of the said Brothers. The said two brothers and their wifes are died intestate. After some years only son of Mr. X created a gift deed infavour of his Son (ie grand son of Mr. X) with regarding to the above said property. There in he mentioned as there is no children to Mr. Y. In fact Mr. Y have a daughter. She claimed half share of the said property and also she wants to prosecute son of Mr. X since he created a false document in favour of his son by concealed the facts. What are the sections applicable to the said problem under I.P.C. to prosecute the son of Mr. X.
Thanking you in advance.
allurisivajiraju
12 April 2010 at 20:49
Respected Seniors.
In Order 38 Rule 5 of CPC, at the time of conditional attachment, one 3rd party involved and given his property towards security to the suit debt. Subsequently suit was decreed. In execution is there attachment is required to the property given by 3rd party or not?
Thanking in advance.
allurisivajiraju
12 April 2010 at 20:47
Respected Seniors,
Whether the major son who is student is entitled for maintenance from his parents or not?
Anonymous
12 April 2010 at 19:37
My father was an army officer. he didn't get his army canteen card. now after 28-29 years later he wants to get his army canteen card. Kindly provide me the procedure and way out.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Orders on 19th
I am party in person for the transfer CMP case of divorce... Transfer CMP is filed by my wife... The madras high court judge after hearing all the arguments has told me that ORDERS FOR 19th. what is the meaning of this? does this mean the judge is going to pass the order in my favour? should I attend on that day? why has he delayed the judgement? on the 19th can I add more of my argument?