Daksh
18 June 2010 at 09:36
Dear All,
I have noted with great concern the pointed comments of presently presiding Judge of Hon'ble Delhi High Court Mr.Justice S N Dhingra who time and again gets carried away and resorts to commenting on pros and cons whether it is against police or norms of the society. Previously during hearing arguments he challenged contesting submission of an Advocate with prompting him to get inflicted himself with the alleged same injuries and get himself videographed and asking the SHO to register his complaint subject to this conditionality his client will get the sought bail. And today his vent against the police find prominence in the Newspaper.
By this thread I am not discussing the merits of the case but I would like to bring the fact of habitual sensationalization by the press and lack of self monitoring by the Bench.
I would like to seek your valued inputs in this regard.
Thanking you in advance
Best Regards
Daksh
Sudeshna Basu
18 June 2010 at 09:05
Dear Sirs,
My father is a retired person and ants to buy an old house costing Rs 40 lacs. Please tell me the approximate amount of Registration and other taxes he has to pay.
Thanks and regards,
S Basu
Partha Roy
18 June 2010 at 08:51
I had filed a case against a promoter and a bank manager U/s.156(3) Cr.P.C for offences punishable U/s: 420/427 IPC.
After 2 years of conducting investigations the Police has issued a FRT on the grounds that I had filed a case on the same matter before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and therefore my complaint was civil in nature. However, in our petition of complaint itself it was mentioned that we had filed a case in the Consumer Court and only after duly noting this fact, the Ld. CJM directed the Police to investigate the case U/s: 156(3) Cr.P.C.
We had filed a 'NARAZI' petition against the FRT filed by the Police and the Ld. CJM appeared to be somewhat irritated by the Police Report because it appeared to insult the knowledge & power of the Judiciary.
He then appeared to suggest that the case should be converted to a 'Summons' Case to be tried U/s.200 Cr.P.C and on our agreeing to his oblique suggestion an Order was passed directing that the case should be tried u/s:200 Cr.P.C.
Could I please have the views of our Experts on whether the action taken by us was correct or if there was any other better option?
Jagdishchandra Bhatt
18 June 2010 at 08:38
Driver is not having licence. Heirs of the deceased have filed petition u/s 163a of M. V. Act. Whether maintainable or not? Driver died in an accident. Plz advise.
Anonymous
18 June 2010 at 08:35
Sir, a case is pending in a court under section 506 IPC. can a case be filed for SOME OTHER CAUSE OF ACTION in another court, where it is having jurisdiction, on the same accused, by the same complainant, under the section 506 IPC.
Ankur Goyal
18 June 2010 at 08:31
To,
The Hon’ble CJI,
Haryana & Punjab High Courts,
Chandigarh
SUBJECT : PLIGHT OF A COMMON MAN TO SAVE HIS
LIFE AND CARRIER
Sir,
This is a Plight of a Common man who has been traped by the misues of Women oriented laws and the Society, the brief facts relating to my grievences are stated hereunder:
Sno. Date Events
1. 13.02.2005 Married with Nitika Gupta, D/o Sh. Sharavan Gupta, R/o 645/9, Bazarian Gali, Babra Mohalla, Rohtak by Matrimonial advertisement in Hindustan Times under Manglik Column.
2. 08.02.2006 Out of the said wedlock an issue was born namely Kinjal
3. 12.06.2007 My parents who are also the senior citizens and were residing at Ludhiana had disinherited me and my wife Nitika making the root cause of all the quarrels my mother-in-law Mrs. Saroj Gupta.
4. 22.04.2008 Marriage of younger sister of Nitika Gupta, where i was abused and humilated by in-laws and i was thrown out of the said marriage. my wife Nitika refused to come with me, instead of repeated requests, and i started residing alone in the said matrimonial home at Gaukran School Road,Hanuman wali Gali in the house of Shri Gangadhar Bhatnagar, Mata darwaza, Rohtak.
4. 27.04.2008 Got a call from landlord at 12:30 p.m stating the incident of Housebreaking by Mother in law and few local Goons,and Dacoity was commited at my Residential Premises. I requested one of my friend’s namely Ajay Mishra to rush to the local police post on phone and seek help of police. He took S.I. OmPrakash with him to my premises and my in-laws were asked to put back all my belongings in my rented protion back
5. 27.4.2008 (19:30) S.I. Sh. OmPrakash talked to me on Ajay’s Mobile and askedme to meet him at Gaukaran Police post at 1900 hrs in the evening and when I reached at Gaukaran Police post i was beaten mercilessly by Tarun Gupta and his associates on the gate of Gaukaran Police Post in presence of Sh. Omprakash who was sitting in green underwear and white banyan on a wooden chair in the police post and discarded my F.I.R was discarded by saying “ TU LUDHIANA KA REHNE WALA HAI. ABHI ROHTAK KA MAHAUL TUJHE NAHI PATA. ABHI TO SIRF PITA HAI. ANDAR KI BAAT MAIN JAANTA HUN. TUJHE GOLI MARNE KE LIYE TERI SASURAL WALON NE 40,000/- DE RAKHE HAIN. DEKHNA CHAHTA HAI TO 10 MINUTE RUKJA WARNA BHAG JAA.MAIN BHI CHOWKI MEIN AKELA HUN. TERI KOI MADAD NAHI KAR SAKTA”.
6. 01.05.2008 An F.I.R was lodge u/s 498(A), 406, 506 AND 34 I.P.C., alleging of cruelty together with my Father (Ex-Indian Navy), Mother & Brother of which prima-facie was discharge by your Hon’ble court dated 11.08.2008, marked herewith as an “Ex-A”.
7. 14.7.2008 - 21.07.08 Dacoity was commited by my in-laws of my valuable items in Rs. 7 lakcs, like computers equipments,Electronics items(give all details), all Certificates since my childhood, of which, i immediately informed S.S.P. Rohtak through post on 23.7.2008 and requested him to lodge my F.I.R. against my in-laws but I was neglected plainly.
8. 11.08.2008 I again sent a reminder to S.S.P. Rohtak to lodge my F.I.R. against Tarun Gupta, Surender Gupta and Saroj Gupta and associates but all in vain.
9. 15.12.2008 I had seen DC ROHTAK SHRI R.S. DOON in his grievances committee meeting after getting bail on 15/12/2008 to give me justice and he ordered the rohtak police to recover the belongings of my computer shop “ KINJAL COMPUTERS” to earn my livelihood and my certificates but the rohtak police converted the order into enquiry and dumped the report for 1 year which i again asked the APIO CUM DYSP Rohtak under RTI ACT 2005 for the DC’S order of recovery and the APIO gave me the reply which is marked herewith as an “Ex-B”.
7. 19.05.2009 Panchayat was called of by my in-laws themselves in my native village Samchana, Tehsil Sampla,Distt. Rohtak which my in-laws demanded of Rs.15 lacs for return of my all certificates, of which the Panchyat had given me in writings as how the fruad was commited on my in-laws part, marked herewith as an “Ex-C”.
8. 9.2.2010. Divo
rce granted by the Add. District judge, Ludhiana, upon findings of the Hon’ble Judge on Pg. 12, “that I was Subject to Cruelty on part of Nikita Goel”, which is marked herewith as an “Ex. D”.
9. I Wrote an online complaint to DGP Haryana on Haryana Police Site whose acknowledgement and complaint id is 00247/2009 whose status till date is “ FORWARDED FOR NECESSARY ACTIONS. SORRY NO ACTIONS TAKEN”. THEN I wrote to S.H.O. P.S. CITY ROHTAK online whose id is 0028/2010 and the status is as above.
10. I wrote to Mrs. Kiran Bedi at www.saferindia.com thrice but the status is “ UNDER PROCESSING, PUBLISH IMMEDIATELY” AND NO ACTIONS TILL DATE.
11. I registered my complaint at President’s Secretriat whose id is PRSEC/E/2010/03115 and PRSEC/E/2010/04223 but all in vain.
12. On 25.3.2010. I registered my complaint on NHRC site whose id is 102164 but unfortunately my file was closed. Then I sent a registered letter to NHRC by post on behalf of my old parents and senior citizens who are suffering from chronic heart disease and diabetese. MY father is Ex- Indian Navy and heart patient and my mother is diabetic since last 26 years and falsely implicated in this 498A though they had disinherited me and my wife Nitika 1 year before this dowry case was lodged and they had mentioned my mother-in-law’s namely Mrs. Saroj Gupta in the affidevit of disinheritance very clearly saying that she is the root cause so we are disinheriting our younger son Ankur Goyal and his wife Nitika on 12/06/07 whereas the F.I.R. No. 275 dtd. 01/05/08 P.S. City Rohtak was lodged under I.P.C. 498A one year after the disinheritance.
13. I emailed to Mrs. Sonia Gandhi twice at soniagandhi@sansad.nic.in, of which no reply till date.
14. I contacted and mailed my details to India TV news channel at Noida but they also said we are not interested.
15. I then mailed to IGP Rohtak range, DIG Law & Order, DG C.I.D., D.GP. CID1, AND IGP CM SQUARD FLYING SQUARD but all in vain. I have even written to the journalists of the newspapers of Haribhoomi, Navbharat Times and The Hindu editor also. I had mailed to Shri Gadkari, Mrs. Sushma Swaraj and Shri L.K. Advani but all in vain.
16. Local Police of Rohtak calls me in police posts and harrashes me “SAYING TU CHAHE CM KO YA PM KO LIKH LE, SAARI REPORTS HAMARE PAAS CHOWKI MEIN HI AAYENGI AUR HUM WAHI KARENGE JO HAMEIN KARNA HAI” A.S.I. CHARAN SINGH, SABJI MANDI POLICE POST. MOBILE NO.: 09466626467 AND S.I. RAMPHAL, GAUKARAN POLICE POST SAYS” TU LIKH KAR DE KI MAINE APNE CERTIFCATE KHUD KAHI KHO DIYE HAIN. HUM PAR UPAR SE DBAV HAI. TU DUPLICATE NIKALWA LE TO HI TERE LIYE THIK HAI. KUCH DEGA TO KOSHISH KARENGE CERTIFICATES DILWANE KI.” HIS MOBILE NO. IS 09354135938.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I Humbly requested you to
a) Direct my Certificate to be release from the hands of my in-laws, so that i can get a job of which i can survive my livlihood.
b) Proper legal actions to be taken against the tyranny culprits involved into this Clan.
c) Direct and investigation to be carried out and a Lawyer to be apointed from the Legal Aid cell to defend me in the matters.
d) Any other alternative remedy upon your directions, I beg you Sir to help me as I am very much depressed and disappointed after knocking all the doors in search of justice.
Awaiting for your reply ASAP.
Your’s Faithfully,
Ankur Goyal.
+91-9729637599
ankurgoyal19781@rediffmail.com
Anonymous
18 June 2010 at 08:22
under the section of 163-A of the motor vehicle act how do the cross examine of the witness as a doctor
Anonymous
18 June 2010 at 01:01
Sir, I had taken a personal loan of of Rs.50000.00, I had issued 27 cheques for equal monthly instalments and the loan was suppose to get over by December 2008. They deposited my cheques on the 15th of every month till February 2008, in march they said due to non micr cheques they can not deposit the cheque , as the due date was near I paid installment by cash and insisted they have to return remaining non MICR cheques so that I can swap with new MICR cheques, thereafter they closed local offices.and they never returned the cheques for swapping. Pls note there was no cheque bouncing.
In October 2009 somebody called me up saying he is GE countrywide’s legal advisor and started threatning when I told I will register a case with local police he told me to pay Rs. 10000.00 as onetime settlement , for which I was ready and asked him to give formal letter so that I can make payment after that he stopped calling me
Now today some body from himachal Pradesh police called me up saying there is arrest warrant pending against me and he is going to send the file to local police station, he called up my residence and took my mobile no from my wife who is very much scared now.
He gave me one advocates no in himachal Pradesh, when I spoke to him he said court has sent me two notices and you have not answered ( I have not received any notice from court or any official information from GE). He told me to pay principal amount pending by today afternoon 12.30pm at GE’s agents office.
I need your guidance on this, my question is how can they file case in himachal Pradesh when my cheques were deposited in Chennai for clearance, registered office is in delhi.
Pls help me
swetha
17 June 2010 at 23:09
I had filed crpc.125 against my husband. He did not attend hearing for few months. Exparte order passed and warrant also issued. It seemed that he had absconded.
I filed habius carpus petition. Court ordered to find my husband, but it is almost 6 months have gone. Police did not bring him to court.
Could you please suggest me what I should do to bring him in front of court/judge. Please help me. Thanks in advance.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
application for Wine/Beer Bar Licence
Please Tell what is the procedure for taking Wine/Beer Bar Licence ??
Thanks