T.R. Ganesan
26 June 2010 at 19:40
I am inclined to have the legal openion with regard to the Criminal Case pending for trial by the Magisterate. The 2 accused in the matter were in P.C. and MCR as well. Both the accused has been enlarged on bail by the same Magisterate who passed the process under section 156 (3) of Cr. P.C. The accused are professionally teachers in a private School run by the Trusts. Interestngly, the Complainant claiming to be a Treasurer of one of the Trusts in which one of the accused is also a bonafide President and an Assistant Teacher in another School run by another Trust. As per the ltest Schedule I under the Bombay Public Trust Act 1956 Register maintained in the Asst. Chrity Commissioner the Accused is the President and his name is appearing in it. No legal changes are incorporated in the Rgister by the office of the ACC. The legal and original Treasurer is other than the Complainant. The Complainant and other associates now called as Reporting Trustees claiming that they have filed a Change Report with the Assistant Charity Commissioner. They having lost faith and confidence in the proceedings in respect of the Change Report pending with the of the ACC, approached with an Application in the first week of March 2010 to the Charity Commissioner Maharashtra at Mumbai to get transfer the hearing on the Change Report to another ACC. This proceedings are not so far decided, for the reasons the Ld. Commissioner attending to High Court,Mantralaya, on leave extra and the matter is being adjourned week after weeks from March 2010. During the intervening period the Complainant and other associates claiming as President, Secretary, Treasurer approaching all the forums to harass and humilate the real, legally correct and bonafide President who is accused.
My pertinent question is that the said Complainat's instance one socalled Secretary writing a letter enclosing therewith certain documents and the Judgement and Order of the J.M.F.C. to the Principal of the School in which the President is employed as an Assistant Teacher. The Principal issued a Show Cause Notice by not disclosing the basis for initiating disciplinary action from the show cause notice. The socalled Secretary has no locus to write to the Principal and endorsing copies down the line from Education Minister to Education Officer, Zilla Parishad right. Under the circumstances what legal action and/or legal remedy is available for defence?.
I am concerned for the aused employment, The trusts institutions are govt. aided therefore, the salaries are paid by the Government.
Kindly post your valuable advice in the matter.
T.R. Ganesan
Advocate.
Anonymous
26 June 2010 at 18:44
I WISH TO KNOW WEATHER JAIN'S ARE UNDER OBC CATAGORY , IF SO IN WHICH STATES AND HOW CAN I OBTAIN CERTIFICATE?.
I UNDERSTAND THAT DELHI GOVERNMENT HAS RECENTLY INCLUDED JAIN UNDER OBC CATAGORY AND I WANT TO INCLUDE IN ORISSA. SO WHAT ARE THE PROCESS AND HOW DO I MOVE AHEAD.
Anonymous
26 June 2010 at 18:19
we would like to restrict political demonstrations near schools and colledge. need refrence of supreem court ruling..
suresh
26 June 2010 at 18:02
sir my wife filled 498a against my whole family and the case not yet come,as i am an nri.she filled another case in family court saying that she gave 3 lakhs to my father and mother and 40soverigns of gold,we fought the case by giving evidence such as we were not there to get that money,even that is true,for that case judgement came saying that i want to pay 3 lahks in cash and 28 soverign of gold or 3lakhs and 60 thousand cash.we ar wating for the detailed statement.can i go for an appeal in high court and what are steps and how much i want to pay totally for going appeal and is there any changes of winning,since family court mostly favours the women not the truth.
Vishal Lakhanpal
26 June 2010 at 17:55
Regarding information of other employee
Hello friends
An employee from our organisation has requested information of other employee which are given below can u help providing which information can be provided to the applicant and which are not and under which sections that cannot be provided :
1. Since 2003 how many vigilance case are being going on against Sh. Rahul. In how many he has been prosecuted given details.
2. The detials of promotion Sh. Rahul has got
3. The detials of GPF, pay fixation of Sh. Rahul
4. Copies of vigilance cases going on and the copy of the same. 5. Pay fixation office order, office order after promotion.
Anonymous
26 June 2010 at 17:45
sir my wife filled 498a against my whole family and the case not yet come,as i am an nri.she filled another case in family court saying that she gave 3 lakhs to my father and mother and 40soverigns of gold,we fought the case by giving evidence such as we were not there to get that money,even that is true,for that case judgement came saying that i want to pay 3 lahks in cash and 28 soverign of gold or 3lakhs and 60 thousand cash.we ar wating for the detailed statement.can i go for an appeal in high court and what are steps and how much i want to pay totally for going appeal and is there any changes of winning,since family court mostly favours the women not the truth.
chakradhar
26 June 2010 at 16:37
I am G Chakradhar,Staying in Abu Dhabi,since i am not living in india i gave gift deed to my neighbour, so i want to cancel that gift deed on my 300 s.yads plot .please advice me.
Anonymous
26 June 2010 at 16:20
i am a divocee. i have custody of my 6 yrs old daughter. After divorce i hav shifted to other place and changed the school of my daughter. Now he is objecting me and troubling me saying i should have asked him or consult him before taking admission in other school. He is having access/ meeting rights. Can he object this manner in legal terms. he is arguing and troubling me thru sms. pls guide.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Cr. P.C. 156(3) in IPC Section 467
I am inclined to have the legal openion with regard to the Criminal Case pending for trial by the Magisterate. The 2 accused in the matter were in P.C. and MCR as well. Both the accused has been enlarged on bail by the same Magisterate who passed the process under section 156 (3) of Cr. P.C. The accused are professionally teachers in a private School run by the Trusts. Interestngly, the Complainant claiming to be a Treasurer of one of the Trusts in which one of the accused is also a bonafide President and an Assistant Teacher in another School run by another Trust. As per the ltest Schedule I under the Bombay Public Trust Act 1956 Register maintained in the Asst. Chrity Commissioner the Accused is the President and his name is appearing in it. No legal changes are incorporated in the Rgister by the office of the ACC. The legal and original Treasurer is other than the Complainant. The Complainant and other associates now called as Reporting Trustees claiming that they have filed a Change Report with the Assistant Charity Commissioner. They having lost faith and confidence in the proceedings in respect of the Change Report pending with the of the ACC, approached with an Application in the first week of March 2010 to the Charity Commissioner Maharashtra at Mumbai to get transfer the hearing on the Change Report to another ACC. This proceedings are not so far decided, for the reasons the Ld. Commissioner attending to High Court,Mantralaya, on leave extra and the matter is being adjourned week after weeks from March 2010. During the intervening period the Complainant and other associates claiming as President, Secretary, Treasurer approaching all the forums to harass and humilate the real, legally correct and bonafide President who is accused.
My pertinent question is that the said Complainat's instance one socalled Secretary writing a letter enclosing therewith certain documents and the Judgement and Order of the J.M.F.C. to the Principal of the School in which the President is employed as an Assistant Teacher. The Principal issued a Show Cause Notice by not disclosing the basis for initiating disciplinary action from the show cause notice. The socalled Secretary has no locus to write to the Principal and endorsing copies down the line from Education Minister to Education Officer, Zilla Parishad right. Under the circumstances what legal action and/or legal remedy is available for defence?.
I am concerned for the aused employment, The trusts institutions are govt. aided therefore, the salaries are paid by the Government.
Kindly post your valuable advice in the matter.
T.R. Ganesan
Advocate.