Anonymous
16 July 2010 at 00:43
Gentlemen, is there any ruling of Supreme court that complainant can not file a single case of more then 3 cheques..???actually accused has got 68 cheques bounced 20 cheques on 1 single date 13 cheques on 2nd single date 35 cheques on 3rd single date. accordingly i have filed 3 cases in the court.
in all the cases summons were issued bw was issued then nbw was issued and finally accused got the bail.
while discussion accused's lawyers mentioned the point which is the basis of my question. plz give me expert advice n if possible the latest verdicts os supreme court in cheque bouncing cases
ankit jain
16 July 2010 at 00:33
dear concern ,
can women become karta after her husband death and left two minor daughter.
if she can become karta can she open a new bank account
Anonymous
16 July 2010 at 00:33
I would like to know how to implead a person along with the defendant in a High Court. Site any relevant section, if any.
Gaurav Pandya
15 July 2010 at 23:42
is there any person who appears in Kachh Labour Courts for a matter from Labour side?
If he would be a new comer or fresh than it would be more helpful to me.
Please contact me
advocate_pandya@hotmail.com
ANAGH MISHRA
15 July 2010 at 23:36
In 1985, Allen Chang and his brother Ben Chang established in Calcutta a Company: Chang Motors (P) Ltd registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The Company dealt with manufacture and sale of Luxury cars. They registered their trade mark CHANG MOTORS in 1987. The trade mark is shown below.
Over the years, due to vigorous use of the mark, as well as large amounts spent on advertisements, Chang Motors created for itself goodwill so strong that the consumers began to associate the mark CHANG exclusively with Chang Motors. Chang Motors sold its motors through out India, and had its own service stations in all major cities. It also had technical collaborations with automobile industries in many countries of the developing world.
In 1990, due to difference of opinions and clashes between Allen and Ben, Allen unilaterally reduced Ben’s share in the Company, as a result of which, Ben severed relations with the company and settled down in Bangalore.
In 2005, Ben established a company named Chang Spare Parts Ltd in Bangalore and became its Managing Director. It manufactured and sold Spare Parts for all vehicles. The trade mark CHANG was registered in 2006. The trade mark is shown below.
As of 2006, the financial statement of Chang Motors recorded the Company being worth Rs. 800 Crores, whereas the Statement of Chang Spare Parts showed a net worth of Rs. 20 Crores.
In 2007, Ben Chang was involved in a massive and much publicized auditing scam involving nearly Rs. 50 Crores.
Soon after, Chang Motors issued a Cease and Desist Notice to Ben Chang stating that his use of the mark CHANG infringed the trade mark and trade name of Chang Motors. The notice further claimed that the impugned mark was deceptively similar to the mark CHANG MOTORS and also, the products manufactured by Chang Spare Parts catered to the same class of users as that of the products of Chang Motors.
Upon receiving no response from Ben Chang, Chang Motors filed a suit for infringement of trade mark and trade name on the above mentioned grounds, and seeks injunction.
In the written statement, the defendants denied all allegations. They stated that the plaintiffs did not enjoy monopoly over the surname CHANG. Further, the products in question were registered in different classes. The defendant also claimed that they had established goodwill of their own in the city of Bangalore.
The suit has been instituted in the High Court of Bangalore. No other facts than the facts mentioned are involved in the dispute. the trademarks have been attached as under...!!! can ne1 pls help me with this cae..i mean how to go about with it !
ncvijaykumar
15 July 2010 at 23:34
A director received a property from a company under a family settlement as per the award of the arbitrator under the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996. Whether such property be treated as a "Benefit or Perquisite" under section 2(24)(iv) of the Income Tax Act 1961? is there any case law in support of the assessee that it is not taxable under the above section?
kiran
15 July 2010 at 22:55
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service ) Regulation Act
A private school upto 10th is runned by a trust registered under Bombay Public Trust Act in Maharashtra
is it mentioned in any of the GR or Act as to HOW MUCH PERCENTAGE OF STUDENT FEES SHOULD BE SPENT ON THE SALARY OF TEACHING AND NON TEACHING STAFF.
Anonymous
15 July 2010 at 22:11
a pro-note was executed by a person and before completion of limitation period he issued a cheque of principal amount plus interest.that cheque has been dishonored and a complaint u/s 138 NI Act has been filed. Now we want to file civil suit for recovery But the problem is that the limitation period of pro-note has expired can we file suit on behalf cheque treating it acknowledgement of loan. please guide with legal position
Shree.
15 July 2010 at 22:10
Dear All,
I urgently need advice and judgements regarding the below matter:
Date of cheque presented and got dishonoured: 27.10.2003
cheque dishonoured recieved from Accused Bank: 29.10.2003
But Intimation of Return memo recieved from the complianant only on : 7.11.2003 ( Due to illness of Complianant)
Legal Notice send by Complainant's Advocate to the Accused on; 29/11/2003
Accused Acknowledged the Notice on :31/11/2003
Then Compliant filed u/s 138 & 142 to Magistrate on :10.2.2004(Filing along with condone delay of 27 days and the Magistrate condoned delay in filing taken cognizance of the Compliant)
1.Is there any Judgements regarding Legal Notice to be sent only after recieving return intimation memo from the Bank and then only Limitation period starts?Any High court or Apex court judgement regardng this issue?
2.After filing condone delay petition along with the Main Compliant,Magistrate taken cognisance,then the Accused cannot question at the time of Arguments stage ,after evidences over?
Citations Required?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Citations --at what point of time can be used in a case ?
My advocate says that citations can not be used while filing Petition/reply or rejoinder but they can be used/shown to the judge at the time of arguments only,Is he right?