LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Abhinay Kumar Shaw   25 July 2010 at 00:45

Pledge

Anurag proceeding to Europe, leave his furnitures on charge of Birendra, as his agent during his absent. Birendra, without Anurag's authority pledge the furniture to Chaman, and Chaman knowing the Birendra had no right to pledge the furniture, advertise its for sale.
Can Chaman be compied to deliver the Furniture to Anurag ? Please suggest with proper ground.

Abhinay Kumar Shaw   25 July 2010 at 00:38

Possession of House`

Avinash files a suit against Suresh & Brij to obtain the possetion of House X.
During the pendency of the suit Dinesh Transfer House X to Mahendra.
Ultimately, the court passed a decree in favour of Avinash and against Suresh and Brij. Is this decree binding against Mahendra as well ?. Please Suggest.

pratik   25 July 2010 at 00:29

Transfer to members

22- Transfer to members of a class who attain a particular age.
Where, on a transfer of property, an interest therein is created in favour of such members only of a class as shall attain a particular age, such interest does not vest in any member of the class who has not attained that age.


Pls explain me the meaning of vest , vested interest . What as per section the age is not given so which age should be considered.

Thanks In Advance.

pratik   25 July 2010 at 00:23

The decisions of the Superior Courts of Justice in England .

The decisions of the Superior Courts of Justice in England are authoritative precedents recognized by English Law. In our country, Article 141 of the Constitution says that the law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of India. By this, it is made clear that all courts in India are bound to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court even though the said decisions are contrary to decisions of the House of Lords or of the Privy Council. Privy Council decisions are binding on the High Court so long as the Supreme Court does not overrule them. [PANDURANG KALU Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (AIR 2003 SC 733)]. The Supreme Court under Article 141 of the Constitution is enjoined to declare law. The law declared by the Supreme Court is the law of the land. It has been held in the case reported in BENGAL IRON CORPORATION Vs. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER [1994 (1) Supp. SCC 310] that no doubt a statute is binding, but it is the satute as interpreted by the highest court which is binding on all other courts.

Query : What do u mean by House of Lords & Privy Council in detail because this words are also used under the indian evidence act . So pls elaborate it if possible with the example(S).
Becasue as per the abovementioned article the law of House of Lords & Privy Council also binds to the Supreme court it means it is the highest one among the indian constitution of india & also the apex court.

So pls tell me the meaning along with keeping in mind the indain evidence act also.

Thanks In Advance.

Abhinay Kumar Shaw   25 July 2010 at 00:20

Sentence of Imprisonment for Life.

a person is charged of murder of another person. The charge sheet is filed in the court of Chief Judicial Megistrate, who passed an order for sentence of imprisonment for life. Advice With reason.

jvramakrishna356   25 July 2010 at 00:13

Factories Act Application

A Pharma company is having an exclusive R & D in a totally different location. Whether the R & D activity falls under manufacturing process under factories act and will it fall under the category of 'Factory'.

Please revert with your views...

Ramakrishna
09703100700

Anonymous   24 July 2010 at 23:11

Malicious prosecution

what shall be the course of action if a complaint filed under section 498A IPC is closed by investigation after putting investigation report . can a complaint for malicious prosecution be filed against wife and his relatives.

Anonymous   24 July 2010 at 22:48

Information Technology Act

Dear experts,
Can anybody give me multiple choice questions with answers of the Information Technology Act?

Jitendra Kulkarni   24 July 2010 at 22:46

Demand Notice under Section 13(2) of Securitisation act

The property I have purchased had a secured loan against it taken by the earlier owner. The loan had become NPA in 2003. Now bank has send a demand notice u/s 13(2) of securitisation and Reconstruction ... Act. The earlier owner is not tracable, and to save my property, i may have to pay the amount. The demand notice nowhere mentions the date of NPA . It just mentions about outstanding amount as on 31.05.2010 and future interest as the amount as payable. The amount mentioned as o/s on 31.05.2010 is the o/s amount on the data of NPA and does not include interest from the date of NPA till 31.05.2010. Can this be interpreted that bank has waived off the interest from the date of NPA till 31.05.2010 or is it a typing mistake. If it is a typing mistake, can I take shelter under that , pay the demanded amount + interest from 31.5.2010 and force the bank to release the charge on the property ?

pucchi   24 July 2010 at 22:07

esi, pf

do we have to deduct and deposit esi, pf of labour we have employed for repair and maintainence work in our factory from the immidiate day or this esi, pf factor need to be done if they have worked for certain days like minimum 26 days etc.

please clarify, thanks in advance for clarification.