Anonymous
07 August 2010 at 08:45
ONE PERSON "A" HAS SOLDED HIS PLOT & REGISTERED IN 2009 TO "B".AND AGAIN THE SAME PLOT WAS SOLDED TO "C" BY "A" IN 2010 AND IT WAS REGISTERED TO THE "C" WHAT IS THE "B"s PLOT? WHO WILL THE RIGHT OWNER FOR THE SAID PLOT? "B" AND "C" BOTH ARE WENT TO THE COURT.IN THIS CASE WHO WILL WIN THE CASE? KINDLY ANSWER TO MY QUERY? URGENT?
Anonymous
07 August 2010 at 08:34
EXPERTS, Is there any free legal services are there in Districts Courts for the poor peoples ?in ANDHRAPRADESH STATE?& HOW TO APPROACH?
Anonymous
07 August 2010 at 08:31
a person supplies materials for construction under the strength of a work order ossued to him by a pvt. org/Trust and later submits his bills which were accepted on the date of submissions itself.
Now more than three years have elapsed rendering the filing of money suit for non payments of bills barred by limitation from the date of cause of action.
Question is whether the date of sending legal notice after two years from submission of bills gives rise to a fresh cause of action to bring the filing of suit within limitation period?
chandrashekharshah
07 August 2010 at 08:01
In Motor Accident Claims Case, the Tribunal awarded the Claim in favour of the Claimants and instructed that the same shall be deposited by the Insurance Company and after that would be recoverable by the Insurance Company from the Owner of vehicle.
In Motor Vehicle Act, there is no provision which provides to pass such type of orders by the Tribunal. But in many cases, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has passed such type of orders by exercising powers under Article 142 of Constitution of India.
My question is that whether the Tribunal and/or High Court can also exercise such powers?
Thanks you,
C.S.Shah
venkitasubramanian m d
07 August 2010 at 07:56
I have a question to ask. A Society for Horticulture a voluntary body, regd.under the Societies Regn. Act has a provisionn, that all application for membership shallbe accompanied by remittance of a fee aand it shall be considered by its Governing Council and the Council can admit the applicant as a member or reject it without assigning any reason.
In the present case, the membership has not been accepted. But the past secretary has sent notices to attend General body meetins, against which there were written protests from members, recorded in the minutes book The suit is now filed as if they are members and injn. against expulsion. We contend they have not legally become members and there cannot be estoppel by conduct as the byelaws, give full power to admit or reject.
Can the act of wrongly inviting the said persons, without they having been duly admitted to membership give them the status of members
Request valuable expert views
venkitasubramanian
Anonymous
07 August 2010 at 01:46
i have heard that a girl automatically becomes half owner of the property of the husband,is it right?
What are pre-nuptial agreements ?
Are they valid in India ?
Anonymous
07 August 2010 at 01:39
An agreement consisting five pages but signed and witnessed on last page only, whether is a proper legal document or not ? What if someone changes the front pages ?
Is not it the best way that each page be signed and witnessed ?
a.manoharan
07 August 2010 at 01:34
DEAR FRIENDS, i want to know still Indian Railways Act, 1890 is in force and Notice under Section 78B is (Statutory Notice ) mandatory .Because i can not find out the said Act even in INDIA CODE. Still in force means , can u help me to get that act through online. Because i have to file the case against Railways on behalf of Insurance Company as Subrogagee . my e mail ID: advocatemanoharan@gmail.com . Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
07 August 2010 at 01:30
Tell me what is the difference between these two ,if there is any ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
AGREEMENT
Dear Experts , ONE "A"& HIS MINOR SONS WAS EXECUTED AN AGREEMENT TO "B" IN 2004 FOR THE LAND AND THE "B'HAS SOLDED THE SAID LAND TO VARIOUS PERSONS,WITH OUT PAYING THE SALE AGREEMENT CONSIDARATION TO "A" HERE "A" EXECUTED AN A CONDITIONAL G.P.A.TO "B"IN 2005.AND THE G.P.A.WAS REVOKED IN 2009 BY "A"IN THESE MEAN TIME "B"SOLDED THE PROPERTIES TO VARIOUS MEMBERS .NOW "A"SONS ARE MAJORS .WHAT IS THE "A"& HIS SONS POSITION? "B" WAS ESCAPED .WERE SHALL A GO FOR HIS RIGHTS ?