Anonymous
20 November 2018 at 23:32
i wanna know is this case going to be filed under district court under which section. And what were the cases related to it.
Moot Court Problem
Ankit, a school teacher, found that Prakash, a student of his class who was about 10 years of age, was misbehaving in the class. By way of punishment the boy was sent to the adjoining room and was asked to keep sitting there and to write an essay on good behavior. The room was bolted from outside and Prakash was told that the door would be opened after he completes the essay. The boy fell asleep and did not wake until the classes were over. Manish, the Chowkidar on duty, who was supposed to clean all the rooms and then lock them, asked Naman a peon to do the job that day for him. Naman did not clean the same and locked that room from outside. There was a possibility of the child (Prakash), climbing on a chair and coming out through a small window in the room. The child remained in the room till the next day. On enquiry by the child’s parents from the school Chowkidar, they were told that all the children had gone back and there was no child in the school. When the school opened the next morning, the child was found unconscious. He was taken to a near by hospital but he died there. Prakash’s mother suffered nervous shock. She remained hospitalized for 2 months. The doctor then declared that she suffered permanent mental disorder. Prakash’s father was a temporary employee in a private firm. He took 2 months leave to attend his wife in the hospital and his service was terminated.
Prakash’s Father (Mr. Rakesh) sued Ankit, Manish and the school authorities to recover the following losses:
1. False Imprisonment of Prakash.
2. Shortening of expectation of life of Prakash.
3. Medical Expenses incurred on treatment.
4. Nervous shock to his wife and consequent loss on her treatment.
5. Loss of Job.
6. Vicarious Liability of the school management.
7. Mental Agony and suffering due to the above stated losses.
Chippy
20 November 2018 at 20:55
Sir.. My father passed away in 2008 and my mother become mentally ill.. Before her death she had partitioned our fathers property to me and my sister in 70 :30 ratio respctively.. But after her death there is a 3 acre land of which i am doing the renuvating works. But my sister suied file against me to get the land.. What should i do?
Salam Robinson Singh
20 November 2018 at 20:02
Someone pliz, pliz answer my question.
Salam Robinson Singh
20 November 2018 at 19:55
Govt.regularized some of the contract employees who are recruited under the same advertisement but in different post in the same dept. Can we claimed the same regularization?.Is this the discrimination?. Are these regularized employees similarly situated employee to the irregular employees .
Balaji Bakthavathsal
20 November 2018 at 19:43
Dear Learned Lawyers,
In a false and fictitious civil suit filed by the plaintiff seeking partition of a property on which the plaintiff has no hold at all, the trial court, after the conclusion of the evidences of the suit, the judgment date was marked as 18.07.2018. However, the judgement was not delivered as the plaintiff side wanted to present their side argument which was closed after grating sufficient time (11 adjournements and almost 3 months time). The IA petition was allowed and after that the case was posted for judgment on 26.09.2018 for the second time. And this time, the plaintiff came forward to reopen the case again to present a vexatious document as evidence and it was too allowed. After that process, the suit was announced for judgment for the third time on 30.10.2018 and on that day the judgment was postponed for the reasons that the judgment is not ready and the judge is busy with some other case as per the direction of the Hon’ble High Court. The judgment again postponed to 13.11.2018 for the fourth time stating that the judgment is not ready. Again on 13.11.2018, the judgment was postponed to 19.11.2018 for the fifth time stating that it needed some clarification. On 19.11.2018, again the judgment postponed to 23.11.2018 for the sixth time, this time stating counselling as the reasons which is not clear.
Can you please learned lawyers, elucidate the situation and advice me further course of action to be taken ?
Thanks & Regards
Thirumalai Dasan K
20 November 2018 at 15:02
Dear Sirs/Madame, Due to various issues, I filed a Consumer case in 2016. Sent one Legal Notice requesting documents related to Land, in 2017. Even the MD of the builder met my advocate twice in his law chamber in 2018. I turned down a request on 27.4.2018for a meeting with him slated on 7.5.2018. I have been sending RTI queries, Grievances with CMCELL and PMO. They filed a complaint stating that we are filing all complaints to make money on 1.5.2018 @ Police Station. CSR was closed. They sent me a Defamation notice for 5 Cr dt 18.5.25018 and I replied on 01.6.2018. The PS called for an enquiry against a CMP Petition with magistrate court on the same complaint, under Sec Cr Pc 161 & 91) as if they have to submit my statement by 61.11.2018.I recorded my one page statement with PS on 08.11.2018.Police did not give me a copy of complaint. As on today, 20.11.2018, I have not received any notice from court nor found in a cause list till 30.11.2018. My advocate tries to get the case document from court but it is not found /received. The case number itself not traceable in court. Your advise on this please. Thanking you
Thirumalai Dasan K
20 November 2018 at 13:14
Dear Sirs/Madame, Due to variuos issues, we as a group of owners under a welfare assocaition (registered) staged a oneday fasting protest in July 2015. The association introduced by the builder filed a suit in magistrate court and dismissed in 2018. I filed a Consumer case in 2016. Sent one Legal Notice requesting documents related to Land, in 2017. There were people from Builderside , retired judicial officer spoke to me and my advocate. Even the MD of the builder met my advocate twice in his law chamber in 2018. I turned down a request on 27.4.2018for a meeting with him slated on 7.5.2018. I have been sending RTI queries, Grievances with CMCELL and PMO. They filed a complaint stating that we are filing all complaints to make money on 1.5.2018 @ Police Station. CSR was closed. They sent me a Defamation notice for 5 Cr dt 18.5.25018 and I replied on 01.6.2018. Now an important department ordered (20.9.2018 & 20.10.2018) for reinpsection.Now the Builder Filed a CMP Petition with magistrate court on the same complaint ( Defamation notice). Can he file CMP in (Nov 2018, under Sec CrPc 161 & 91) and I recorded my statement with PS on 08.11.2018 instead of pursuing defamation case, when I replied to his defamation notice wtih all evidences. Thanking you
Anonymous
20 November 2018 at 00:34
Dear sir,
My parents purchased a MIG plot in New Town, Kolkata, governed by New Kolkata Development Authority (NKDA). Later, he constructed a house on the plot. Last year they gifted me the house along with the plot. Now, the mutation of the building has been done with the local authority (NKDA). My question is,
i) Do I need to mutate the land separately with Land Revenue office?
ii) The local authority (NKDA) has only mentioned the details of building in the mutation certificate. The dimensions of the plot area are not mentioned in the mutation certificate. Can it create a problem in future, in case of any dispute?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Incorrect boundaries entered in a sale deed
Due to my personal needs I sold a piece of agricultural land in 2016 employing a broker, while executing the deed, broker convinced me to add 10' pathway in one direction saying this pathway will be provided by him on broker's cost and that without the defined pathway, parties will not buy the land. Other than in the chouhaddi (boundary) part, there is no mention of this pathway anywhere else in the majmoon (description) of the deed, nor in the original agreement I signed with the broker. Broker sold this plot to 4 different parties.
This land is beside a sarkari payeen and other than the first buyer, there is no other approach for subsequent buyers as it was an agricultural land. Believing him, I executed the deed and he convinced me to sign the deed mentioning this pathway in one direction, but now he is saying I have to provide that 10' pathway. This will mean a loss of at least 2500 feet as the plot is almost 250 feet in length. What options do I have? Is it possible to file a lawsuit against the broker and the buyer? Kindly suggest me.