vishal
03 January 2019 at 17:39
My client who is OBC caste candidate married to ST caste female in 1972.
And their children have OBC caste certificate.
Now agricultural land in jaipur purchased in the name of ST caste mother from ST caste person.
Now Children of the inter caste couple whose have OBC caste certificate as per father caste, want to transfer said agricultural land to themselves.
As these children are the class legal heirs of parents property.
Kindly suggest how said agricultural land transfer to OBC caste children from ST caste mother
Anant
03 January 2019 at 17:30
Dear Sir,
Few months ago my friend get married with girls belong from relative. My friend qualification is ICWAI (CMA). Qualified professional. At the time marriage discussion people from girls side verified everything i.e. his bank statement, degree certificate, discussed with all their relative and then finalize. But at that time they does not give any clarification amount their daughter. They said that she is 12th pass. After marriage it is noticed that, she can't write simple marathi, words also and unable to do the calculation of Rs. 100 to 150. Her Iq was not so good and unable to read marathi. In short they have given wrong information. As her relative also agree that, she was not able to do this things but her parent is not agree. we have call recording of their relative stating that,same things.
During the four month friends family try to teach her but she is unable to understand finally they send her to her parents home and give time limits of one month to change her but as of that time limits also exceed more than one.
how to resolve this. friend family want to resolve this mutual understanding but parents of girls not responding them and not receive call.
how to resolve this. if we want to go in court how to stand the case to resolve it within short time of span.As friend age is 31 and if legal matter goes for 2 to 3 year then her future may be destroy.
Please guide.
Samudra
03 January 2019 at 17:00
Inam land was occupied by the Indian Army
Inam land was occupied by the Indian Army illegally and constructed buildings. On proving ( by submitting the documents) of our ownership they have entered into a lease agreement retrospectively. Now using a clause in Inam Act., "that a person can claim the ownership; if they are in position of the land on 1-11-1973"., Laying their ownership claim on this lease land.
Can an Indian Army claim this; as they are under lease and paying the lease amount on the above said date to the Inamdhar.
Thankingyou ALL, in advance expecting Quick solution Please.
PANKAJ
03 January 2019 at 14:58
Dear Sir / Madam,
kindly advice me i have purchased land last 10 years ago. i was purchase from two brother and his mother . After 10 years his sister sale her share same property to third party last month . same land sale without my knowledge without portion can sale as per Hindu act . Also his brother and mother sale all land so many people. but his sister ask to share only my property and he sell his share in my property . Can i suite a case his brother and mother as a forgery.
pls. advice me how can get police help.
Regards
Pankaj
Aditya
03 January 2019 at 14:31
Experts please may guide.. Where Gram sabha in Uttar Pradesh had any right to execute sale deed on barren land of gram sabha before year 1974 by any GO Or any Act.
Please go through my case pending in HC.. Your inputs may lead a correct way forward in my case.
1. Gata no 60 in gram fattepur, pargana - Hadha, tehseel and zila unnai was registered as banjar land with land category 5(3) in year 1972.
2. In 1973, gram Pradhan with concern of gram sabha members auctioned this gata to Habibur Rahman for setting up industry.
3. In 1973, gram Pradhan has done sale deed of same gata in favour of Habibur Rahman.
4. In year 1973, dakhil kharij was done by SDO by confirming the report of tehseeldaar.. And gata was ordered to be registered as abadi and in the name of Habibur Rahman in Khatauni.... While category of land has been changed to 6(2) without any order in Khatauni.
4. In 1974, Collector Unnao, given his approval to Habibur Rahman for setting up handloom / powerloom factory on same gata.
5. In year 1983, Habibur Rahman did sale deed in favour of Kamal Narayan Verma.
6. In year 1993, Kamal Narayan Verma filed title suit after reclaiming of land by gram Sabha at site.
7. In year 1996, Civil Court Unnao passed an ex party order in favour of Kamal Narayan Verma.. And declared Kamal Narayan Verma as Malik and Kabij of above mentioned gata. Further order decreed.
8. In year 2001, post death of Kamal Narayan Verma.. His sons did registered sale deed in favour of Meera Singh.
9. Till 2001 the said gata was in the possession of meera Singh.
10. In 2015, meera singh field entry correction case in SDO court.. For correction of 6(2) entry.
11. In March 18, meera singh has been made a party in one of the case of dhara 229, this case was filled by state government on the ziaur Rahman on whom name gata 43 was registered in same manner.....As gata 60 registered on the name of Habibur Rahman in year 1973.
12. In Nov 18, a writ was filed by LMC of fatepur against ziaur Rahman whose name was registered as bhumidhari as per the order of additional commissioner after passing an order against correction of entry of land category from 6(2).
13. HC accepted the writ and asked for report of SDM in this case.. SDM in her report confirmed that auction and sale deed was exacted in the case of Ziaurrahman.. Further SDM also narrated that in 1972 there was around 55 bigha land in fattepur village was registered as banjar.. In many such land sale deed was executed by gram sabha.
13. On 03.12.18, in the interim order of HC... Judge directed DM unnao to reclaim their property of Ziaurrahman ans also directed to reclaim the property where sale deed was executed by gram sabha in this 55 bigha banjar land.... As per HC.. Gram sabha does not have any right to execute sale deed in view of sec 117 of UP ZA LR Act.
Further case has been listed as a fresh on 03.01.19....
(Till 02.01.19 Meera singh could not become a party however an application has been moved for same and expected to be taken up on 03.01.19 listed date.)
14. In view of HC interim order.. SDM unnao has appointed lekhpal of gao and nagar palika shuklaganj EO as a receiver of gata 43 and gata 60.. Post correcting the dhara from 229 to 146 in 26.12.18.
15 On 27.12.18, property of meera singh (where a guest house was constructed) gata no 60 has been sealed by Tahseeldar as pee SDO direction... And possession of property was handed over to lekhpal and EO of Nagar palika Shuklaganj.
Roshan
03 January 2019 at 12:34
My father wants to sell a property in Nashik, MH. The builder is offering a price that is 20% less than the ready reckoner rate. My question is will he have to pay Long term capital gains tax on the ready reckoner price or the consideration received.
The builder also insists on getting the registration and sale deed done and pay 50% of the consideration right away and the remaining 50% within 12 months time. In this case, what precautions should be taken to ensure he fulfils the payment. Should post dated cheques be issued, bank name be mentioned. Any other formalities to ensure a smooth transaction
Thanks in advance.
gokul
03 January 2019 at 11:46
Hi,
we have been putting the money in local chit fund company from past 12 years and a lady was running this business, she was introduced to us by one of our neighbours.There was a new chit started in the year Jan 2016 for the amount of 1 lac and completed in the year Aug 2017.but we havent received the amount till now.its been one and half year since im making rounds to them for my hard earned money. In between they have changed their house and not lifting my calls. the only means is their shop located nearby, whenever i go to their shop and ask for money they threaten us by saying they will complain agaist us as we are creating nuisance in front of shop and takes video. she outrightly saying that she will not give the money.The only proof i have is a small note book of monthly installements with their sign and a few audio recordings of our conversation.
please could someone suggest what can i do in this regard?
Ankit
03 January 2019 at 11:04
Hello respected advocates,
I am accused in a criminal complaint case and complainant died today, victim is still alive.
Charge-frame has been done in that case, case will continue or will it end?
Thanks in Advance.
m.v.n.moorty
03 January 2019 at 09:31
Whether Consumer forum having jurisdiction?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Maharashtra chs comveyance procedure
Our Society was formed in 1993 with 56 Members 7 stories with A.B and C Wings. Our Society Land is approximately 5500 sq.metres out of which approximately 1450 sq.meters is under Collector's Control. As per Govt. Directives the builder is supposed to surrender/allocate 6 One bedroom flats to Government Employees on subsidized rates whereby, the land under collector's control will be released to us. This has been 100% complied and the records are available at the registrar. We have been trying for Deemed Conveyance and started processing our papers in September 2017. Recently, when registrar was approached they informed us that we need to wait till 2019 Election as the Rules are going to change. My Main Query is since the builder has adhered to the Government Directives - WHY we have to wait till the 2019 Election and in what way we are concerned with the new rules that may come in force after election. We are supposed to follow the rules which are in force today. The Registrar has to fulfill his obligation and give us NOC as per written agreement to the builder which says that the Land Under Collector's control will be released to the Society after fulfilling the allocation of 6 flats to the Government Employees. All our papers viz. Agreements, Stamp Duty, Registration of Flats are in order. Grateful, please advise what should be our next approach in this matter.
Thanking you and with regards
Roland Noronha