Anonymous
06 March 2019 at 13:48
Dear Sir,
The member has filled and registered the nomination form in favour of his wife. The member died couple of years back. Society wants to endorse the share certificate in favour of his wife. Is it necessary to mention (Nominee) against the name while endorsing the share certificate behind.
Thanks
Chintu
06 March 2019 at 12:47
What is meant by PW.1.Ex.p1 is marked .and accusef cross examination call on 7.3.2019
Ganesh Prabhu
06 March 2019 at 12:34
Partner A and B run a firm with unregistered partnership deed from Oct 08 .Partner B swindled money and was caught on Oct 18 he accepted and retired on Jan 21 2019 by signing in registrar of firms documents but didn't sign on release deed ,on the same day partner C enters the firm. Now Partner B freezed the current account
x by giving a letter to private bank, subsequently filed an OS in city civil court for Interim and permanent injunction not to open the account for current Partners" A "and " C "and locked funds claiming he is still partner and funds should not be withdrawn, At this stage number of cheques issued by the firm signed by Partners "A "and retired Partner "B" dated before the retirement of the partner "B" are bounced in another current account of the firm " y " with insufficient funds message .Now is the retired Partner liable and be charged under 138 of NI by the cheque bearers ?
Chintu
06 March 2019 at 12:30
My sister filed case on her husband and his parents in 2013.the case going for trials now in district court.my sister's husband and his parents kept three lawyers to defend and she is not able to get justice.the case is undersection 498A.yesterday the judge wrote that...(.she is examined as PW.1.Ex.P1 is marked.Councel of accused cross examination call on 7.3.2019.) Please give the meaning of this and please explain what the judge is going to do on 7.3.2019.my sister is not getting justice...please suggest wat to do to get justice.
Chintu
06 March 2019 at 12:04
My sister filed case on her husband and his parents in 2013.the case going for trials now in district court.my sister husband and his parents kept three lawyers to defend and she is not able to get justice.the case is undersection 498A.yesterday the judge wrote that...(.she is examined as PW.1.Ex.P1 is marked.Councel of accused cross examination call on 7.3.2019.) Please give the meaning of this .and please explain what the judge is going to do on 7.3.2019.my sister is not getting justice...please suggest wat to do to get justice.
Anonymous
06 March 2019 at 11:49
My sister filed case on her husband and his parents in 2013.the case going for trials now in district court.my sister parents kept three lawyers to defend and she is not able to get justice.the case is undersection 498A.yesterday the judge wrote that...(.she is examined as PW.1.Ex.P1 is marked.Councel of accused cross examination call on 7.3.2019.) Please give the meaning of this and please explain what the judge is going to do on 7.3.2019.my sister is not getting justice...please suggest wat to do to get justice.
Swati Gupta
06 March 2019 at 09:10
Respected Team,
I have been selected in ibps rrb scale 2018 exam i have been allotted jammu & kasmir gramin bank where as i m from chhattisgarh. As it is grameen banks so taking transfer to home state can never be possible, the only way is to again give exam and cracking exam is not a easy thing also many candidates including me have to take care of our parents, ibps should allot according to state i am not asking for home town but state. Can i take this matter to supreme court?
Maan
06 March 2019 at 08:02
Dear Experts ,
From last 6 months company is deducting on an average of 20% as deferred tax from employee salary and paying 20% less salary.
I have resigned from company , My question are
1. ) Is deferred tax deducted from salary is payable to employee at time of full and final settlement ?
2. ) If yes , and company will not pay then can we challenged company in civil court ?
3. ) what is the maximum time period by law for full and final settlement ?
Regards
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
stamp duty on a transfer of ownership to ex husband
I got a divorce decree in a UK family court on mutual consent basis from my wife. As per terms of settlement, she has to transfer her part of ownership rights in a jointly owned flat at Bangalore. As she is unable to come to India at present, it is decided that a POA will be executed by her through Indian embassy in UK. However, I want to know answers of a few questions in this regard.
1. Divorce degree is already finally given. Now the question is will I be able to get lower stamp duty benefits in India , if a gift deed is executed by her poa ?
2. What should be the status to be shown in POA while executing it in UK before Indian embassy, an ex-husband or simply husband ? If ex-husband is shown, will it affect lower stamp duty chances ? If simply husband is shown, it will be factually incorrect as divorce decree is already given.
3. It is almost 6 months have already passed when the divorce decree was pronounced in UK family court. Is this decree needs to be ratified in Indian court also for the purpose of remarriage and other property related transfers.
4. Please suggest other appropriate methods to save on stamp duty charges.