modassir nasim
12 June 2013 at 13:48
is section 63 and 68(a) of copyright act bailable or non bailable . please give citation.
modassir nasim
11 June 2013 at 02:26
COPYRIGHT ACT SECTION 63 and section 68(a) is bailable or non bailable. pls give citation.
sweety f
11 July 2012 at 20:56
HELLO SIR,
I AM THE COMPLAINANT AND WITH DURESS, THREAT N PRESSURE FROM THE, NEIGHBOURS, VESTED INTEREST PEOPLE AND THE COPS, I REGD A FALSE FIR U/S 307 AND 354 OF IPC AGAINST MY EMPLOYER.
NOW I M REPENTING N I HAVE REALIZED WHAT R THE COSEQUENCES N THAT I HAVE RUINED THE LIFE OF A GEM OF A SINCERE N TRUTHFUL PERSON WHO HAD DONE SO MUCH TO ME AND MY WHOLE FAMIL SON N DAUGHTER TO COMPLETE THEIR HIGHER EDUCATION. HE FINANCED AND HELPED MY SICK PARENTS, SISTERS, N OTHER FLY MEMBERS. HE FINANCED US IN LAKHS TO GET RID OF THE DEBTS N PAY THE LOANS.
HOWEVER NOW I WANT TO WITHDRAW THE COMPALINT AGAINST THE EMPLOYER N WANT TO RENDER HIM JUSITICE.
*****NB******: PLS ADVICE WHAT SHOULD I DO. WHOM N WHERE SHOULD I APPROACH. WHAT R THE PROCEDURES. WILL THE COPS ARREST ME. OR THE COURT GOING TO PUNISH ME FOR FILING A FALSE FIR. PLS ADVICE STEP BY STEP N WITH SIMPLIFICATION. REGSRDS
modassir nasim
06 July 2012 at 23:50
Pls provide case law in view that section 438 crpc(anticipatory bail) is applicable in a complaint case where cognizance has been taken of non bailable offence and only summon has been issued ,warrant has not been issued.
modassir nasim
09 June 2012 at 01:09
'A' files a complaint case u/s 138 NI act against 'B' in the year 2004 . He loses the case in year 2012 and 'B' wins the case by the judgement pronounced by the magistrate court.
Now can 'A' file a money suit against 'B'. Will the case of A be barred by limitation. since he had the knowledge of cheque bounced long before in the year 2004 .
Pls give citation at least year and court name if possible.
modassir nasim
16 April 2012 at 00:17
In a complaint case of 498(a) on the 1st date a petition u/s 156(3) was filed and was allowed by the court whereby it was ordered that a copy of complaint petition be forwarded to officer in charge of P.S. so that he can register an f.i.r and investigate the case, and on the same day a copy was sent to P.S. But even after one month no F.I.R. has been registered.
1) My question is if i file a misc petition in court for reminder to the officer in charge of P.S. to register the F.R.I. can the magistrate order that leave the 156(3) and proceed with your complaint case.
2)If answer is in yes then what will happen to previous order of magistrate ,moreover magistrate has no power to recall its own order.
3)and if the magistrate recall its order then will he send a notice to P.S. to not register the F.R.I.
4)and if the magistrate orders to proceed with complaint case and leave 156(3)without sending any any notice to P.S. and in the mean time the P.S. also register a case and send to court then which case will be taken up.
modassir nasim
22 February 2012 at 02:04
A tenant (shop owner) named Mr.X accepts Mr.Y as his landlord and is paying rent for past 30 years as Mr. X was inducted as a tenant by Mr.Y 30 years ago.Now one Mr.Z claims himself to be the owner as he pleads that he has purchased the property from the sisters of Mr.Y and sisters of Mr.Y were the true owners as this property belonged to father of Mr.Y and this portion belongs to the said sisters in which his shop is situated and hence claims the rent.
My question is can Mr.X (tenant) file an interpleader suit against Mr.Y(landlord) and Mr.Z ?
Pls give case law if possible.
Anonymous
26 June 2011 at 22:41
Two persons are charged with section 147/448/323/506 of I.P.C. can it be compounded with the informant and the victims since they are ready for compromise with the accused persons. (since section 147 is non compoundable)
(actually there is a another case against the victims of the above in which sections are compoundable it is actually case and counter case and in both the cases parties are ready to compromise.)
Pls do answer and also provide relevant case law.
venu
13 May 2011 at 19:40
Dear sir,my freiend's son is 27 years old & he is a doctor. He was in love with a girl for the last 4 years,inclusive of physical relationship with the girl with mutual conscent with necessary precautions. before 4 months girl refuse to marry him & last month she called him again & he was taken to a local mahila sangam. There in presence of 10 onknown people,he was forced to sign on a 10/rs non-judicary paper that he will give assurance to marry her. My queries are as follows. 1.Since both of them belong to differant communities boys parents are not willing for this wedding. 2.In case they force him to get married i think this would be a troubled marriage. 3.After marriage can the boy seek for divorce with out performing the consummation ceremony officially. 4.in case he files a for a divorce,can he get a divorce.What would be the time frame. 5.With out performing the marriage,can he escape paying her some compensation. His whole family is in distress. Please advise me what can be done. Intimate relationship of both of them was with mutual consent. Please send your valuble advise. The case has already gone to mahila sangam. With regards, Venugopal.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Anticipatory bail and section 82 crpc
SC recently in Lavesh vs state of delhi dt 31/8/12 and state of m.p. vs pradeep sharma dt 6/12/13 (on reading both the judgement then its clear) said that if section 82crpc is properly issued then anticipatory bail will not lie and is liable to be rejected. pls throw some light on it.how far this judgement is correct and can it be precedent. and more over when landmark judgement is there known as grubashk singh sibbha vs state of punjab of 1980.