Anonymous
11 December 2009 at 09:35
We are working as dev.officer in a general ins. co.in our service condition the employer can deduct my increment if we does not acheive our targets.As per rules before deducting them he has to give a WARNING LETTER to us. But he has not given us that letter & issued the orders to deduct the increments.
Is it legal?
How can we get relief & from where & under which rule?
Anonymous
11 December 2009 at 09:27
1.CAN A VICE CHANCELLOR REVOKE THE SUSPENSION OF A PRINCIPAL MADE BY THE COLLEGE MANAGEMENT UNDER ANY LAW IF HE IS FOUND GUILTY IN MISAPPROPRIATION OF GOVT. FUNDS IN INQUIRY MADE BY LOKAYUKT.
GIVE DETAIL REPLY REFERRING THAT LAW / G.O.
2.CAN A VICE CHANCELLOR REVOKE THE SUSPENSION OF A LECTURER WHO IS WORKING UNDER SELF FINANCE SCHEME AFTER COMPLETING HIS TENURE & BY GIVING HIM ONE MONTH SALARY IN ADVANCE MADE BY THE COLLEGE MANAGEMENT UNDER ANY LAW.
GIVE DETAIL REPLY REFERRING THAT LAW / G.O.
Rashee
10 December 2009 at 20:30
Hi All,
I am working as AM-HR in an IT company and I have to create an employment agreement including 3 months training and 12 months service period in a single agreement. As per the agreement if employee breaks the bond he is liable to pay compensation against the training given to employee. Directly company is not spending in the training as it is onjob training but as we are microsoft gold partner so we can get special access to study material that he cannot get from any where.
so please could you provide me the format of agreement and some tips to make it more tricky and enforceable also.
Thanks
Rashee
ABIR GANGOLY
10 December 2009 at 11:59
Hi!!!
I would like to know what comprises of minimum wages?
A company is paying a fixed gross salary comprising of Basic, HRA, Books & periodicals and Deputation Allowance and the total is fixed every month. Can this be considered as minimum wages?
OR, will only the basic be considered as minimum wages?
Kindly provide me with documentary proof also in support of the justification.
Thanks & Regards
mahesh
09 December 2009 at 15:09
is it necessary for an employer to pay pf for an employee whose basic exceeds Rs.6500. In fact does he need to be covered under pf
nirvay kumar
09 December 2009 at 12:09
whether it is legal to keep a month salary in hand If one person is appointed in as a consultant in india?
awaiting for ur early reply.
Thanks
nirvay
nirvay kumar
09 December 2009 at 12:08
whether it is legal to keep a month salary in hand If one person is appointed in as a consultant in india?
awaiting for ur early reply.
Thanks
nirvay
nirvay kumar
09 December 2009 at 12:06
whether it is legal to keep a month salary in hand If one person is appointed in as a consultant in india?
awaiting for ur early reply.
Thanks
nirvay
malay chatterjee
08 December 2009 at 19:28
In 1990, Govt. of West Bengal announced career advancement scheme. At least one promotion would be given to emplyees at ALL LEVEL after service of 10 years.
In the Rules framed thereafter, all scales were considered exept scale No. 20. Most likely, the rules framed did not consider because all most all candidates going to scale No. 20 were from lower scales through promotion. However, one post in scale No.20 in Transport Dept. was filled up through direct recruitment through P.S.C as per Recruitment Rules. The incumbent when applied for CAS benefit, Dept. replied that there was no provision of granting CAS in scale No.20.
What is the remedy? Does this case has merit? Is there any other cases like this?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
EPF pension scheme
I retired after attaining the age of superannuation (i.e.) 58 years. I am getting past service benefit under FPS1971 is Rs.382, & pension of Rs.1207/-.My eligible service was 32 years.My past service upto 15/11/95 was 18 years. Actual service after (pension scheme implemented)15/11/95 was 13 yrs. 8 months 11 days. But EPFO Chennai, has taken into account my pension service only 13 years. When I asked them they told that they have received orders from Govt. from February 09,as it should be taken as pensionable service only 13 years. Hence I am losing 8 months 11 days of service and proportionate pension amount. Will it be correct?