LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

abran   24 June 2012 at 14:32

Surplus staff obsorption

dear sir can surplus staff can be transfer by rule of last come first go rule basis.what is the meaning of this rule please explain it.

S.B.adil rahman   24 June 2012 at 11:01

Duty hour of police

What are the duty hours of a police officer? Under which rule or law his duty extends beyond 8 hours without any additinal remuneration like over time incentives etc.Kindly post the reply based on law and rules.

abran   24 June 2012 at 10:25

Administrative transfer

sir,I am primary teacher in nagar prishad .and our nagar parishad school receive all Aid from state government via Zila prishad.in Zila prishad the rule apply for obsorbtion of surplus teacher (according to the G.R senior teacher should be transfer).there is no rule for transfer of surplus teacher from nagar parishad to another Muncipality school.so nagar prishad adopted the rule last comme first go,in transefer matter which fully againt the G.R. rule apply in Z.P .I attached Nagpur highcourt decision for refering.is it fair that a permanent junior teacher can be transefer if there is other non permanent teacher who are senior are present.please guide me.

Tajinder Pal Singh   22 June 2012 at 17:36

Paternity leave

Hi

Is there any Law or something about paternity leave in public sector.

rajesh singh   22 June 2012 at 16:38

Re-examination of witness

pls advice me,

if the applicant side close for evidence can he recall his witness for re-examine.pls send me some case laws on this topic

deepak   22 June 2012 at 09:19

Employee dues-co.under liquidation

I was employed with a deemed limited Mfg.co. with turnover of @ Rs.30 Crores (in 1980 s)at Mumbai.

I resigned in 1983 with acceptance/acknowledgement of resignation.

Employer was not payingmy dues towards LIC premium-deducted and not paid to LIC under salary saving scheme,PF,Bonus etc.I filled a case in Labour Court and judgement was in my favour for Rs.20,000/- in 1986.

Subsequently co.was unde BIFR and I had handedover my claim to official liquidater at Fort,Mumbai.

Now after 30 years ,yesterday I have received a letter from liquidater that I will get Only Rs,20,000/- and no compensation towards interest.I have to file my objections/reply BEFORE 25th June 2012.

Can someone help me if in such cases -employee gets an interest on dues ?? In last 30 years Rupee has been depreciated and cost of living has also gone up.

My employer had @ 2/3 acres of prime LAND in MUMBAI suburbs , valued today at few hundres crores.

indranil   21 June 2012 at 17:40

Threat of putting on absconding list

i was selected by a Indian private bank in 2 months back, i had attended the induction session of 17 days but the joining formalities were not completed like signing on the offer letter and submitting documents, i left the organization after induction period of 17days without the joining formalities as the it was not done by the company even to the other new joinees. so i have not signed on any official document before leaving the. now, after almost 45 days the company calls me up to say that i might be put in the "absconding list". before leaving i had clearly stated in the mail that i was not able to join and above that i did not sign any document acknowledging my acceptance of the job offer. can the company still blacklist me as there is no document of me accepting the job offer.
please suggest on the above situation.

Aditya   21 June 2012 at 12:09

Not recieved salary for 2 months

2 years ago I joined this organisation and worked there for almost 2 months and then resigned from that organisation. But till date i have not recieved the salary for those 2 months. The organisation is closed now(no longer operational). I only have joining letter for that organisation.

Is there any way i can get my salary back.

Binayak Acharya   20 June 2012 at 23:07

Reform act and pay protection against juniors



Subject : Implimentation of Reform act
Message :
Sir, Referring to Gridco Service Transfer Scheme 1996, 19th Board of Director meeting dated 29/07/1997, Orissa Electricity Reform Act of 1998, 8th HRD Committee held on 06/01/99,53rd Board of Directors meeting held on dated 18/09/2000, the 64th Board of Directors meeting held on 02/06/2002, the applications against anomalies on fitment to higher pay as sought to be considered by the authority against implementation of seniority list of General Telecom Cadre was disposed without giving due weightage over their seniority. The fact that the reform act was aiming to ameliorate the stagnation of promotion in different the cadre ,particularly with Talcher Thermal Cadre,because they have already faced a reform.(there was no structre of promotion or further fitment for those to be agrieved ) We 17 Engineers ,under Telecom General Cadre were deprived of getting the benifit against 3 juniors ( because they were just compliting the one time mileage of 8 years as on 31/03/97,but are not under Orissa Public Service Commission service,hence not under seniority but adhoc appointed and regularised by cabinet approval ) because the 64th Board of directors meeting rejected our representation under saying of "a wrong decision taken earlier cannot be a precedent and if required the legalitiy of the earlier decision of the fitment principles can be reviewed and appropriate decision could be taken to set right any act which is wrong and not correct". Can you move to the court to correct the implimentation of above wrong act and hence get the benifit of fitment with effect from date of complition of 8 years service(falling short of few months to two years as on 31/03/97 to 8 years) Please advice Thanks Binayak Acharya,Assistant Engineer since joining of 21/10/1989.

R V SHASTRY   20 June 2012 at 22:08

Retirement age for workmen

Dear Sir,
Can you please let me know the mandatory retirement age for a factory machine operator as per existing labour laws.
Will the company/employer be liable to pay compensation in case of loss of life or disability of the employee (due to natural causes)in case the employee is still employed beyond the mandatory retirement age.