SAPNA KANNAIDAS
27 June 2012 at 16:11
Dear all,
An employee attacked another employee in office in the presence of all, for which the management wants to terminate him. What would be the correct procedure to follow keeping in mind that the offender seems to have some political contacts and may create obstacles for the company.
Thanks in advance.
Sapna Kannaidas
ranjit kumar das
27 June 2012 at 14:07
Dear Sir,
I have the honor to inform you that I have been worked with HDFC life at Guwahati in the month of Feb'2010 after five days working i am not interest to work with the hdfc life because my work is not related with my offer letter, so without any intimation to company I have leave that company due to that time and not well due to my illness.But at present I came to know that they mark me absconding form the company in their HR record without any notice to me.
Kindly help me and inform me without notice a company is make me absconding employee.
With Regards
Ranjit Kr. Das
Ph. 9508004220
ranjit kumar das
27 June 2012 at 14:01
Dear Sir,
I have the honor to inform you that I have been worked with HDFC life at Guwahati in the month of Feb'2010 after five days working i am not interest to work with the hdfc life because my work is not related with my offer letter, so without any intimation to company I have leave that company due to that time and not well due to my illness.But at present I came to know that they mark me absconding form my in their HR record without any notice to me.
Kindly help me and inform me without notice a company is make me absconding employee.
With Regards
Ranjit Kr. Das
Ph. 9508004220
Vijayarajan
27 June 2012 at 13:54
Who is the appropriate authority under PG Act, in relation to an estt which have branches in different states? The respective state govts. or Central Govt?
K.Gopinath
26 June 2012 at 16:33
Dear sir,
1. I am finished B.E (E.E.E) two years ago and working in private concern . I want to study law related to indutrial sector or labour law.
2.Any law course is offered for Engineering Students.
Please tell sir,
I am wait for your reply
Thank you,
Your's faithfully
K.Gopinath
lissing perme
25 June 2012 at 23:22
Respected Experts
In just completed Recruitment process by State Public Service Commission my merit list is just behind the last selected candidate.But last selected candidate did not option for (he kept blank the column provided in application for tick-mark of that post)the post he get appointed for and the post which he option for are filled up by the candidate in top of merit list.
Now My Question are:-
1.Can State Public Service Commission recommend for the post which candidate not option for.
2- As if last candidate had not been recommended for that post,as per the merit list it would be me the candidate that should be recommend for that post by the State Public Service Commission,as I did option for that post.Do I can file writ against decision of State Public Service Commission???
3.Any leading case in this regard.???
Thanks in advance.
abran
24 June 2012 at 15:49
Dear sir can surplus primary teacher of municipal school can be transfer to another municipal school by rule of last come first go rule basis.what is the meaning of this rule please explain it.
deevya
24 June 2012 at 15:06
QUESTION: Hi,
i work in a mnc software firm from 2 and half years in the capacity of project manager
at the time of joining i was asked to submit offer letter or payslip or relieving or bank stmt of my all previous employers (it was like any of these docs)
for 2 of the past employers due to various unavoidable conditions i just had offer letter ,payslip and not the relieving letter as during that period relieving letter was not mandatory by my future employer
Now suddenly after 2 and half years my employer is asking me all the docs in terms of relieving letter and exp certificate...
as they say it is required now again due to their background verificaiton check initiation at this stage as somebody has made complaint of fraud or misrepresentation of personal data about me.
Company HR says me submit the docs for these 2 employers at the earliest...as for remaining 8 employers from my past they already got verification done.
I do not want to undergo all this testing now again in this phase of my career and want to resign now
My question is
>>can i resign during this phase of background verification case due to complaint lodged by somebody to company,As per employee contract i have 3 months notice period or notice payout at the discretion of mgmt
>>I want to resign and go for exploring another opportunity due to location constraints....please help me will my resignation at this time will be again putting me in trouble due to background check or post notice period service i can smoothly exit the company.
>>Also am i liable to give all the previous employement docs again to HR of company when i have served 2and half yrs
>>Terms and conditions of employement says 3 months noticeperiod and for misrepresentation of facts or fraud company can terminate an employee...whereas policy of company says incase of misrepresentation of facts or fraud company can terminate/penalise /can also go for legal action
we are also strictly governed by policy of the company
..what will happen if i resign now/should i not resign and let company come up with the results of background check first/as i m not aable to submit releiving letters to company for 2 employers it is better that i resign rather than company go for further action.
>> Post resignation and during my notice period service , can company still ask me for the documentation related to my previous employers...is there any related law to this point.
Pls pls help it is really urgent...any help/suggestions will be greatly APPRECIATED AND REMEMBERED FOR LIFETIME FOR your support in this hour of need.....many thanks !!!!!!!
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Disciplinary proceedings......after 5yrs
one interesting matter has noticed....one employee under suspension was further chargesheeted and appointment of new io and po were made by the disciplinary authority 5yrs back...the employee under suspension had levelled biasness charges against the io with documentory evidences....the disciplinary authority was totally silent on that issue(INCLUDING THE IO ALSO) for the last long 5yrs(means did not proceed the proceedings but had stopped the payment of subsistance allowance,which is still continuing)....during these periods the employee had requested to disburse him subsistance allowances wanted to know the out come of his biasness charges levelled....but there was no reply.....very recently the disciplinary authority has appointed new io and po for the same proceedings without giving any reason behind that....as per law we have to conclude the disciplinary proceedings as soon as possible in the interest of the suspended employee.....here,vindictive attitude is found because the employee again and again asked for the disbursement of unpaid subsistance allowance in full(ie,75% for 60 months)....here,how can we protect the illfated suspended employee and what will be his present stand in respect of newly appointed io/po---disciplinary proceedings.....plz.help the employee...thanks(.)