ishwar
13 October 2013 at 10:40
Dear Sir,
In 2011 december Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission released a notification for Group - 1 services exam. I am an aspirant of group - 1 services of Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission(APPSC). In May - 2011, APPSC conducted preliminary exmination (objective in nature) for group-1 services exam in which a total of 16000 members filtered for Mains exam out of 1,80,000 of total aspirants appeared for the exam.
After preliminary filteration some candidates went to APAT saying that there are 13 wrong answers in the preliminary examination key published by Appsc. When it went to APPSC notice, it appointed an expert commitee to revise the key objections filed by those aspirants. After careful analysis Expert commitee advised appsc to correct 7 answers out of 13 mentioned by those aspirants. Appsc accepted the suggestions made by expert commitee and altered the Mains selection list(Preliminary cleared aspirants list) as per the new key.
With this revised new list AP Public service commission went ahead and conducted Mains (Descripttive) exam for those 16000(Approximately) and shortlisted 606 candidates for interview. In February and March 2013 APPSC conducted interviews for those 606 candidates and ready to release the final merit list for the 314 posts.
In the mean time the aspirants who were filed the petition earlier went to Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal ( APAT ) and asked it to direct APPSC to revise the remaining 6 bits (13 - 7 mentioned above) also and stop the process. But APAT refused to direct Appsc to stop the process. Instead APAT directed APPSC to continue the selection process but should not release final merit list until the final judgement.
After some hearings APAT ordered APPSC to appoint another expert commitee to look into the 6bits. After indepth anlysis The expert commitee advised Appsc to remove 2 bits to avoid ambiguity as they have more than one correct answers and no objections for 4bits.
But the aspirants went to High court saying that they cant believe the expert commitee report as it was appointed by APPSC itself. Then highcourt ordered UPSC to look into this matter and submit its report within one month.
As they questioned the genunity of Appsc and its expert commitee and delaying the selection process, Appsc filed Special Leave Petition in Supreme Court to vacate the stay order given by AP High Court.
After careful analysis The Honerable Supreme court Bench comprised of Honerable Justices Mr. Chalameswar Sir and Mr. Gokale Sir announced the judgement by ordering APPSC to delete all the six bits which are ambigious and reprepare the mains selection list and reconduct the entire mains exam once again to all 16000aspirants.
But the fact is, even after repreparing the list after deleting the 6 bits also....99% of the candidates who wrote earlier will be also in the new list and have to write Mains exam (Total of 6 discripttive papers) once again.
[As I am one of the 606 candidates who sucussfully cleared Preliminary - Mains - Interview stages.....i know how hard it is to prepare for these stages. If remains conducted all of us loose almost 2 years of time which was dedicated for this preparation and confidence also. In the entire process we did not have neither a role nor did a mistake. Why because the entire selection process is under the control of APPSC. But still we were the loosers and has to write the exam once again and nothing will happen to those professor who prepared the wrong key and Appsc officials who conducted the exams based on such a key]
As per some legal experts APPSC did some blunders and missed some key points in filing its counter.
They are......
1). Expert comittee suggested only 2 bits out of 6 are ambigious and can be deleated. If Appsc deletes those only 3 members out of 16000 will be effected.
2). If it deletes all the 6 bits then a total of 200-300 candidates will be effected out of 16000 candidates who already wrote mains exam.
3). Apart from these technicalities, the present AP law and order situation does not permit any state level exam conduction (AP TET, DSC, ALL University entrance Tests...etc were cancelled already) because of ANDHRA - Telamgana Bifurcation issue. So APPSC cannot conduct Re Mains to all the candidates.
respected Sirs,
My questions are....
1). Can we file a review petition again in SC by taking all this issues to Honerable Justice's Mr. Chalameswar sir and Mr. Gokale sirs....
2). is there any chance to accept this review petition on the above said grounds.....
3). If accepted, in which way can we argue to avoid remains as there is no single mistake on our part....
4). If possible please guess the possible out come judgement ......
Thank you sirs...please give your valuable advice as early as possible....
brij lal
12 October 2013 at 10:53
sir, if a person is charge sheeted in a case (though he is sure of acquittal) but he clear the competitive exam, does his being charge sheet in a court of law,disqualify him from getting the job.
their is no particular specification in the advertisement, but in the declaration it is mentioned that the candidate should not have any charge sheet pending.
if the person is rejected on this ground can he contest this in a court of law.
sr_v@user
11 October 2013 at 15:42
We have a woman employee in our company, she took leave from company because of pregnancy & now she has resumed company after 03 months of delivery. What Maternity benefit can she get? Also tell us if Yearly Leave of 30 days will still be applied to her as to other employees of company? Pls revert...
AJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL
11 October 2013 at 15:29
My friend is going to start Manpower Supply services in Properietorship / Partnership Firm. At present he has 15 persons. My query is if he needs any registration & if yes, with which authority. I feel that EPF, ESI & Contract Labour (R&A) Act are not applicable due to low number of persons. Also Service Tax is exempt upto service of Rs 10 Lacs. Please share your valuable views & correct me if I am wrong. Thanx
SUBHASH
10 October 2013 at 13:27
greetings...
Please response my query..
my company is going to start a new business for that we are going to employ 100 new staff, as per my knowledge PF is compulsory on basic salary upto 6500 pm, now if an employee is coming from a company where he is getting salary above 25000 pm with PF deduction by that company then should MY company also liable to pay PF .
priti kumari
10 October 2013 at 10:16
Dear Concern,
MY Query is If employer is paying medical bonus of two thousand five hundred rupees as per MB ACT 1961 THEN he is not bound to give the paid leave of 90 days as per M.B.Act 1961.Or Employer is bound to pay both.
kindly Ans my query
Regards
Priti
Aditya
09 October 2013 at 22:04
I was working in local private firm but due to every month salary delay I left job. Employer didn't paid my last month salary and he is making threatening to give Rs.10000/- and If I don't he will file complain fraud and 420 case on me.
We don't had any kind of contracts or even single mail which shows I was bound with any kind of responsibility with his company.
Should I ignore it & if he file complain does my case will be stronger.
I was signing sale bill only in that my sign is available with him and he was paying me salary in cash only no ESI, no PF nothing.
Please guide me in this matter I am getting depressed due to this please help me out.
Member (Account Deleted)
09 October 2013 at 21:26
That on 28.02.2004 my services were rendered surplus like services of 44 other court officials month all the above said court officials retrenched above was taken into the service .I made epresentation to District & Sessions Judge Sangrur Punjab but all in vain. Then I filed representation to
Inspecting Judge Sangrur Punjab. That Ld Inspecting Judge of High Court rejected my application on the ground adhoc employee cannot be reappointed in service.Then I filed writ in the Honourable High
Court which was also dismissed on 4-03-2008 on the ground adhoc employee cannot
cannot claim to be re-appointed.Now I came to know that Registrat of Punjab & Haryana High Court issued Letter No.140 spl.E.II/VII.4(8E) dated 15.03.2003 & letter No. 104/spl EII/vii B4(IE) Dated 22-03-2004 regarding Absorption of staff rendered surplus as a result of withdrawal dispensation of
Certain Courts to all the subordinate court.
Will you pls kind enough to guide me what will I do now & also intimate me latest citation of Punjab & Haryana High Court & other material may also supplied to me. So that I may represent my case again.
raksha thale
09 October 2013 at 19:47
i m working in pvt merine service company. As we have worker's union the M.O.U. was signed between WORKER'S UNION and The COMPANY MANAGEMENT.
In agreement both sides agreed on DIWALI BONUS to be paid on GROSS salary of workers. agreement was signed last year. But on the eve of diwali management refusing to pay DIWALI BONUS as per agreement. Pls help us on this situation.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
About resign
respected sir,
i am a central government employee since 2009. in the year 2011 i applied for railway job but i did not inform my department about that and N.O.C. was not taken by me.
now in the year 2013 i am selected for the post i applied for. now i inform my department about my selection they refuse to give me N.O.C.
What will i do now?
should i resign?