RAJESH SHARMA
03 March 2013 at 17:06
I am working in a bank as clerk. I given written test on 03/10/2010. I came to know that I have secured 71% marks thrgh RTI in Dec 2012. All the successful candidate in written test have been promoted. An explanation was called on 13/12/2010 for charges that business outside the scope of employment. chargesheet was issued on 22/12/2011. Please guide whether the promotion given to me or not.
Syed Tarik Raj
01 March 2013 at 15:38
Sir I am working under Dept of Biotechnology, Govt of India. In this office some of the post is on contract basis even though there is creation of post and for the post advertisement is going on. In this regard I want to gather knowledge is that the person so engaged is a retired state employee and he had cross his 65 years also but the Director is still extending his contract period even repeated reminder by his sub ordinate staff. The person in the contract is not even submitted his last pay statement nor his pension statement. At present his is paying a consolidated pay of Rs 35000/- per month. So please tell me what can I do in this regard. I am in the post which can do nothing. but for my knowledge of my seniors I want to get help from your ends. 1. Is there any rule saying that a retired person can be engaged up to the age of 65 or more.
2. How can I move regarding his payment.
Please guide me
Parveen Goyal
01 March 2013 at 00:52
Dear Sir
I was working with a co as distributor through franchisee/C&F. I have issued blank cheques as security purpose and taken receiving on my letterhead from co's employee in this it is clearly written that these chese cheques will not be used or presented in bank in any how without my written permission. the said employee is not more working with co or franchisee.
franchisee dispatched some material in jan-2012 to me without any order which was delivered to me at 10:30 PM. I took delivery of the goods on very much request of franchisee and paid cash to his representative. receiving for goods taken was given along with writing Cash Paid on bill copy. in jan-12 another lot of goods was again delevired to me without order and again same procedure was adopted as cash payment was given and receiving was given on bill copy by writing cash paid. Some time in previous also it was in practice that co's or franchisee employees took cash from me against delivered material. there is no case in which franchisee had given material on credit to me.
In feb-12 franchisee used security cheque by presenting it in bank. but because I have already given instructions to my bank for non payment cheque bounced with comment payment stopped by owner. in March or april-12 2nd cheque was also used and same result.
now he had filed the case against me in sec 138. I have no balance amount to pay in account to him instead I have to take payment from him regarding different claims pending. even i have to take some balance amount from direct co's account also. In previous he sent me a balance confermation report according to his books to me and after reconsilation it with my account books I have written objection on it with the difference in balance amount on it and gave account statement to him and there was no objection received on this from him. Please suggest what will happen and what to do.
venkatadri
27 February 2013 at 19:22
Stage=Workman Hearing / Evidence
My matter is in Hyd.
I am party-in-person.
My employer has 2 factories, one in mumbai and other one is in hyderabad.
At Both the places the matters are same.
Out and-out workman supervisor determination.
At the Mumbai High Court level my management succeeded.
Now the point is I wish to refer the submissions that is made by the employer in the Mumbai matter for my matter in Hyd as several of the submissions made there are absolutely favourable for me in my case in hyd.
I have to visit mumbai take lots of pain to get a certified copy of the WP to file it here. Will the Labour court admit the same and mark it as a my side exhibit. What is the rule says in this ragard ?
Please clarify,sir.
Bhaskar Ghosh
27 February 2013 at 14:56
1. I had taken LTC advance from the office for availing LTC and also leave encashment amount for 10 days EL for availing LTC.
2. I had also gone on tour and returned from there.
3. Due to some reason I did not submit any LTC claim thereon and returned the advance money with penal interest to the office way back in September 2012.
4. But I forgot to return the leave encashment amount for non availing the LTC.
5. The office has now asked me to return the leave encashment amount which I agreed.
6. I only requested the authority to adjust the 10 days E/L that had been encashed for
Now my query is
a) Is the authority bound to adjust the leave after my payment of the leave encashment amount
b) I have 300 days of E/L at my credit whether the previous years leave when it has taken can be adjusted in the next year and whether the authority is empowered to do so which is exceeding the maximum number of days for E/L that can be availed by an employees as per CCS (Leave ) Rules
Bhaskar Ghosh
26 February 2013 at 15:03
One of my colleagues has been pronounced guilty by the disciplinary authority under Rule 16 of CCS (CCA) rules 1965 and the authority has decided to impose a minor penalty on him on November, 20, 2012 through a written intimation where he was also asked to reply if he had to say anything within 10 days which he did accordingly, but till date no punishment has been given.
Is there any time limit to impose penalty on the guilty. If so, within how many days
Suresh
Syed Tarik Raj
26 February 2013 at 13:15
Thanks for helping me
Sir
Sir I am working at Institute of Bioresources and Sustainable Development (IBSD), Imphal, Manipur under Dept of Biotechnology, Govt of India as a Store Keeper. I was suspended from the said post on 23rd May, 2012 as I was in the custody for more than 48 hours in connection to the lost of cheque from the cashier custody and the cheque was enchased. I was released on bail on 29th May, 2012 and the police is saying that they are investigating the case till today. When I got bail the judge say that I was arrested on suspicious ground and now the police is also saying that I was arrested on suspicious ground. Till toady they are not putting up any charge sheet against me.
In this connection please help me -
1. In this connection an FIR [ No. 73(4)2012LPS u/s 420/468/120-B/34-IPC] also launch. So for revocation of my suspension is there any rule saying that first an FIR is to be closed?
2. My Suspension was revoked by an officer dated 20th December, 2012. But the order was received on 28th January, 2013. Till today the FIR is not closed nor the police frame any chargesheet.
In this connection I want to know that:-
whether I am entitled to get all the due salary from the very date of my suspension (without any deduction like SDA, TA, Addl TA etc). Is there any rule saying that full salary/payment is to be made without any deduction if so please tell the quote/rules/clause. Or else there will be some deduction from my salary/payment like SDA/SCA, TA, Addl TA etc etc., I will be very thankful to you if sir kindly help me in this regard. I will be eagerly waiting for your kind reply.
Syed Tarik Raj
26 February 2013 at 13:12
Thanks for helping me
Sir
Sir I am working at Institute of Bioresources and Sustainable Development (IBSD), Imphal, Manipur under Dept of Biotechnology, Govt of India as a Store Keeper. I was suspended from the said post on 23rd May, 2012 as I was in the custody for more than 48 hours in connection to the lost of cheque from the cashier custody and the cheque was enchased. I was released on bail on 29th May, 2012 and the police is saying that they are investigating the case till today. When I got bail the judge say that I was arrested on suspicious ground and now the police is also saying that I was arrested on suspicious ground. Till toady they are not putting up any charge sheet against me.
In this connection please help me -
1. In this connection an FIR [ No. 73(4)2012LPS u/s 420/468/120-B/34-IPC] also launch. So for revocation of my suspension is there any rule saying that first an FIR is to be closed?
2. My Suspension was revoked by an officer dated 20th December, 2012. But the order was received on 28th January, 2013. Till today the FIR is not closed nor the police frame any chargesheet.
In this connection I want to know that:-
whether I am entitled to get all the due salary from the very date of my suspension (without any deduction like SDA, TA, Addl TA etc). Is there any rule saying that full salary/payment is to be made without any deduction if so please tell the quote/rules/clause. Or else there will be some deduction from my salary/payment like SDA/SCA, TA, Addl TA etc etc., I will be very thankful to you if sir kindly help me in this regard. I will be eagerly waiting for your kind reply.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
"dismissal"
What is the time limit for filing an appeal against Dismissal from services.What is the procedure involved for doing so