Sharad Mohan Krishna
16 April 2015 at 02:28
I was employed with this company in Gurgaon who went ahead and terminated my services without giving me any termination letter - and even I have not resigned. In fact their MD had verbally told me that he would help me getting another employment. But since neither I have resigned nor have they given me any termination letter, am I entitled to continue getting salary from them. This happened in Nov 2014 and I haven't received any salary since then. I tried speaking to the MD a couple to times but he has been keeping busy. I have also send a couple of emails but no reply.
Thus if I remain silent, will I continue to be entitled to accumulated salary for all the months which are passing by?
Thanks & Regards
Subhasan De
15 April 2015 at 14:08
I have a problem with the resignation process in my current org. I have submit my resignation on 24th March, 2015 and request to release as early as possible. The letter also received and acknowledged by my IS. Since then, after discussing the matter with my IS and also with HR dept. till today 15th April, 2015, their answer are I have to stay the 3 months notice period. In my joining letter it is written " After confirmation, termination of employment by either party will be by giving three months notice in writing to the other or salary in lieu thereof. In the event of your giving notice of termination shorter than the above period, the company shall have its own discretion to adjust any leave due to you or recover you such amount from your due towards the shortfall in the notice period." According to that I have request them to adjust my all leave(89days PL) or prepare to submit salary of unserved notice period. But they does not agree. Now I have to released by 18th April, 2015 due to the joining to the next. Kindly suggest me what to do, because the Reliving letter and experienced certificate is valuable to me for future.
suresh
14 April 2015 at 12:01
I With four other had filed cases against Pune Muncipal Corporation in the year 1999 which we got a judgement in our favour ie Absorbing us as Meter Reader according to General Body Resolution Dated 22/11/2002 then neither we nor the P.M.C. went further they offered us totally other post ie daily wages rojandari bigari a class 4 non permenanet post without the facilities given to permanent employees on date 2/9/2004 instead of schedulde post of Water Meter Reader
We continued our communication with them time to time they gave us in written that as soon as post are vaccant they absorb us on the said post Meanwhile in a similar case of Mr Maniyar whose judgement was given in 2007 who was also in above GB Resolution and who won the case reffering our case was absorbed RTI disclosed that were post vaccant and PMC had gien wrong info to the court as well as us further without giving us any idea they went to High Court which was rejected on basis of delay We gave notice that we will file contempt of court which resulted in givng us Meter Reader schedulde permanent post ie a class 3 post on 23-10-2012 and got benefits of a permenant employees from 2012
our question are
Can a Contempt of court be filled on the order of industrial court 2004 in the year 2015 High Court Oder 2011 can it make a diff and if filled will it sustain or be rejected on basis of delay is the correspondence
PMC has taken steps to give us back dated benefits but its intentions are clear not to give us as some of the superior authorities claim that the PMC is not bound to give service as per the industrial court decission while their legal department has given several opinions in our favour as that contempt of court action could be taken on the concerened we demand service benifets from year 2004 is our claim right and should we file contempt of court or any other process is there please guide us
Thank You
anjeev
14 April 2015 at 11:59
I was working in IDA scale Rs.36600/- to Rs.62000/- (E6) in a power sector CPSE and joined in IDA scale of Rs.43200/-Rs.6600/(E7) in railway sector CPSE on immediate absorption basis. My application from earlier organization was sent "through proper channel" along with my CR dossier. In my earlier organization I was drawing a basic of Rs.46300/-.
I have asked my new employer that my basic should be Rs.47700/- (with one notional increment on Rs.46300/-) with date of increment remain unchanged i.e Jan. I joined in FEB and my date of increment in previous organization was Jan.
Is my understanding correct as per DPE guidelines or any other rules of FRSR of Government of India. May I request to please provide me the references for putting up my case with employer.
Regards,
Anjeev
anjeevjain@gmail.com
kumarjainn
13 April 2015 at 22:13
sir
the parents are wholly dependent on the govt servant working in delhi. The parents are staying in Home town. they visited delhi and returned to home town. are they entitled for LTC .
The rule is as follows:
It is not necessary for the parents/step-parents /spouse/children to reside with the government servant so as to be eligible for the concession. The concession in their cases shall, however, be restricted to the actual distance travelled or the distane between the headqsuarters of the government servant and the Home town/place of visit, whichever is less.
The parents have travelled to Delhi (i.e. headquarter and returned back) so will the LTC reimbursable amount be zero or can get the total expenditure incurred in LTC.
KmeduVishnu
13 April 2015 at 19:24
Dear Experts,
In Pondicherry State, the State Govt. employee committed bigamy. Kindly advise me under what provisions of law he may be suspended from service?
SHUBHASHISH
13 April 2015 at 13:45
DEAR SIR MY MOM HAS EXPIRED ON SERVICE PERIOD NOV 2014.SHE WAS IN HEALTH DEPT(A.N.M).MY TWO ELDER BROTHER IS MARRIED ONE SONS EACH AND DOING A JOB IN NIYOJIT SIKSHAK(SALARY-9500,11000 RESPECTIVELY) IN BIHAR AND LIVING SEPERATELY BEFORE THE DEATH OF MY MOM LAST FIVE YEARS ON THE BATWARA BASIS ACCORDING TO COURT.ONLY ME AND MY FATHER LIVING WAS WITH MOM. SO NOW MAY I ELIGIBLE FOR COMPASSIONATE BASIS JOB.
Nitu Roy
13 April 2015 at 13:03
I would like to know what is the time limit for filing review application U/s 7B of PF and Misc Act, 1952. Nothing is mentioned in the Act and I went through the sachem also but I didn't find the answer. Kindly Help its quite urgent.
Nitu Roy
13 April 2015 at 12:53
I would like to know what is the time limit for filing review application U/s 7B of PF and Misc Act, 1952. Nothing is mentioned in the Act and I went through the sachem also but I didn't find the answer. Kindly Help its quite urgent.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Service matter bank
Enquiry and penalty order quashed by single judge highcourt in the year 2012.Bank has filed appeal in double bench for reenquiry from the intial stage which is pending.
In the meantime I came to know that after showcause notice Disciplinary authority has
recommended for minor penalty but on the dictates of Vigilance Department major penalty chargesheet was issued.The above documents were sought by me through RTI but bank has refused to give hence final appeal is pending at CIC delhi.
After obtaining above document can I file review petition under section 114 rule 1 of cpc viz Discovery of new and important matter of evidence which after the exercise of due deligence was not within his knowledge or could not be produced when the decree or order was passed.
If above documents prove that whole exercise was at the behest of vigilance department then law laid down by the apex court in the matter of Nagraj Shivrao Karjagi v syndicate Bank in which ruled that no third party like Vigilance department or Central vigilance commission could dictate Disciplinary authority how they should exercise their powers.
Then whole chargesheet and subsequent actions shall be nullified and I will get promotions and all arrears of pay from the
date of penalty.
Please guide me in detail with proper rulings.