Raj
27 April 2015 at 22:52
Sir,
This relates to my cosuin service matter case which is pending before the High court for last 3 years..In one of the appellate court, the service matter was posted for final disposal and there are many petitioners joined together as co petitioners and the court has posted for final disposal...but certain new facts has come and for this impleadmnet of Governing body who is the union minsiter of cabinet needs to be required..
Please inform whether impleadment at thsi stage is advisable before the appellate court??
Lalnunmawia Sailo
27 April 2015 at 21:57
Dear Expert,
The O.M. No.11012/11/2007-Estt. (A) dated 14.12.2007, according to Para-7 provides that:
"7. Vigilance clearance will not normally be granted for a period of three years after the currency of the punishment, if a minor penalty has been imposed on an officer."
In the meantime, letter No. 25165/S/98-1 dt 10.6.1998 clarified that:
“The punishment of censure has no currency. Whenever an officer is ....... etc”.
My query is :
If an officer has been imposed with a minor penalty of "Censure", but one year later needs Vigilance Clearance to be appointed as Member of Regulatory Commission.
(1) Can Vigilance Clearance be granted to him irrespective of Para 7 above, on the ground that 'Punishment of Censure has no currency'?
(2) Or Vigilance Clearance can not be granted to him in line with Para 7, for a period of three years, reckoning the period of three years (0+3)from the date minor penalty was imposed on the officer? (Understanding that punishment of censure is a codified and formal punishment).
Pl tell me what to follow. I hope I explain the problem clear for you this time to enable you to give reply?
Lalnunmawia Sailo
satishkumar
27 April 2015 at 15:28
1. UPSC circulated 56 post of Statistical Investigator- Grade-I[ Group ‘B’,Gaztted] In Office of Registrar General,India,New Delhi during May 2006.
2. UPSC conducted Interview during 20th Nov to 6th Dec, 2006.
3. UPSC has published the Result on 26th Dec 2006 for 38 [thirty-eight] candidates in employment news with the note that the Result of remaining candidates will be declared later on.
4. UPSC has sent the First Recommendation Letter[RL] on 26th Dec 2006 for 38 [thirty-eight] candidates with their merit [marks obtained] to ORGI,New Delhi.
5. UPSC has sent 9[Nine] recommendation letters to ORGI, New Delhi vide different recommendation letters on different dates. Each Recommendation Letters [RL] has its own merit accordingly.
6. The chronology of all 9[Nine] recommendation letters to ORGI,New Delhi is as
Serial No DATED No of candidates Remark
1 26.12.2006 38
2 07.01.2007 7
3 20.02.2007 6
4 13.04.2007 4
5 11.05.2007 1
6 30.08..2007 6
7 19.09.2007 1
8 17.03.2008 1
9 03.07.2008 3
7.UPSC has sent a merit list of 56 candidates on 10.06.2008 associating all the candidates selected /recommended vide 9 Recommendation Letters[RL]taking care the marks obtained by the candidates avoiding the chronology of the issue of the Recommendation Letters[RL] with their own merit[marks obtained].
8. Some candidates recommended vide 2nd, 3rd & 6th Recommendation Letters [RL] has placed before the candidates of the 1st Recommendation Letters [RL] in the Merit List of UPSC.
ISSUES:-
1. Can UPSC club all different [9] Recommendation Letters [RL] by avoiding the chronology of issue of Recommendation Letters [RL]?
2. Can a person selected vide 1st Recommendation Letters [RL] be junior to the person selected vide 2nd, 3rd & 6th Recommendation Letters [RL]?
3. Can the merit list [combined] dated 10.06.2008 be utilized as seniority for all selected Statistical-Investigator Grade-I?
4. I was selected vide 1st Recommendation Letter[RL] at serial no 25 and 6[six] senior candidates either not joined or resigned ;after that I must be placed at 19, but inclusion of candidates of 2nd,3rd & 6th Recommendation Letters[RL] I have been placed at 31.
varuna
26 April 2015 at 21:06
I recently quit a job of 10 years to join a new organization. While I did not ask for a waiver of notice period (months), I requested 'if possible' I may be relieved in next 15 days. My resignation was accepted and I was relieved in 15 days. No mention was made in the acceptance mail that my notice period is being waived or that I would have to pay up for that period.I was wished all the best in life.
After 2 months of me joining the new organization, I have been informed through an email by the previous organization that since I have joined a competitor (apparently there is a non-compete clause in the Employee Handbook) and violated the service conditions, my resignation acceptance is being withdrawn and I am being served with a termination letter which is being sent to me in due course. My dues have not yet been cleared.
Please advise, if my resignation acceptance can at all be arbitrarily withdrawn, and that too after over months of acceptance originally in the guise of a non-compete clause.
Also, would I have to pay up for my relieving earlier than the normal notice period, even though I did not ask for it to be waived and the resignation acceptance did not mention it at all.
Thank you.
MOHAN KUMAR
26 April 2015 at 17:04
Sir
I and my wife both are central govt employees posted at Delhi in different departments.One of my daughter is in class 12 and aged under 18. Recently I have got transfer order for posting outside Delhi. Please advise me the entire procedure to be followed to retain myself at Delhi.Posting liability of my wife is restricted at Delhi only.
sabyasachi
26 April 2015 at 00:07
I have been employed with a corporate training organization & been working on another company's project (being handled by my organization).
I resigned from my duties on 14th of the month as people associated in the project i was into(employee of the other company) put false allegations on me & i cannot compromise on my self respect,I clearly mentioned the same to my employer & said i will continue to work for him for the rest of the month to help him find a replacement for me,but not beyond that.
A)My employment contract says any employee would be considered confirmed after completion of 6 months of probation,where as under the 'probation period' column in contract it says employee would be considered confirmed after successful pass of a performance appraisal.
I have worked in this organization for 8 months & 7 days now,but no performance appraisal had been done 4 me so far....so am i a confirmed employee of my organization ??
B)the employment contract also says if i resign before confirmation i need to give 48 hr. notice max;if i resign after confirmation i have to give A MONTH'S notice.
So in the afore mentioned context how much would be my notice period - 48 hr.s or 1 month??
C)the employment contract no where says that i have to pay / compensate my organization if i resign without giving a month's notice.
Then how can my employer ask me to pay money equivalent to 2month's gross salary & threat me to legal actions if i fail to pay ??
please guide me as in all cases if i succumb to my employer my career would be completely spoiled
Lalnunmawia Sailo
25 April 2015 at 21:57
Dear Expert,
The O.M. No.11012/11/2007-Estt. (A) dated 14.12.2007, according to Para-7 provides that:
"7. Vigilance clearance will not normally be granted for a period of three years after the currency of the punishment, if a minor penalty has been imposed on an officer."
In the meantime, letter No. 25165/S/98-1 dt 10.6.1998 clarified that:
“The punishment of censure has no currency. Whenever an officer is ....... etc”.
My query is :
If an officer has been imposed with a minor penalty of "Censure", but one year later needs Vigilance Clearance to be appointed as Member of Regulatory Commission.
(1) Can Vigilance Clearance be granted to him irrespective of Para 7 above, on the ground that 'Punishment of Censure has no currency'?
(2) Or Vigilance Clearance can not be granted to him in line with Para 7, for a period of three years, reckoning the period of three years (0+3)from the date minor penalty was imposed on the officer? (Understanding that punishment of censure is a codified and formal punishment).
Pl tell me what to follow. I hope I explain the problem clear for you this time to enable you to give reply?
Lalnunmawia Sailo
kaur
25 April 2015 at 20:37
I am in private job for the last more than 15 years and confirmed employee of the institution. A year back in the interest of institution I reported certain facts before the higher authority against my senior officials regarding misappropriation and embezzlement of funds. But those officials are on & off trying to harass me and in one occasion I have applied for higher post which was vacant in this Institution but I was not even called for interview. I requested that I want to meet the Head Patron but was not allow to meet. Few months back my mother had written to Head Patron and explained the full details regarding the situation which I had to face for just speaking the truth and bringing actual facts before the higher authority but since more than 5 months have passed no reply has been received to my mother nor to me. Now I came to know from some sources that society is planning to remove me from the service. My query is that in case I am removed from service do I need to approach Labour Court or High Court for early decision.
C Mohan
24 April 2015 at 17:04
Dear Sir,
I have read some where that the employees who are working for Maintenance of Electrical and Civil works are considered to be looking after perennial works and not temporary ones.
It is requested to kindly give me the reference of judgements in favour of employees who were working for the maintenance of civil and electrical complaints in the Govt. of India Department.
With regards,
C. Mohan
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Termination
Dear Sir,
Currently i am working with a good mnc company which is work in different domain. this company is hire me as an Embedded Trainer but the high authority says the your feedback from the students side is not good but when i collect the feedback from my side then i find the other result so what can i do from my side legally?