abc
30 March 2013 at 13:10
I wished to change my wife's name and sign but she denies for both.Hesitant to change.
According to Maharashtrian community trend
name change is common and its my wish to change cause I feel it will be a honor ot give her a name after marriage.There is nothing that her identity will be axed or something.
This is like when a girl is accepted by a family after a marriage she is absorbed in the family and ours being decent and caring family,we want that she should follow the trends and culture that have been followed by all the earlier females of the family.
Doing so is against her choice is what she says.following maharashtrian community trends is waht she is against.She wants to be like she was free and no restriction or rules to follow as in her college days.
Its a prestige of married girl to style and wear all the appropriate ornaments or bindi and other associated things which are a certificate for the general society.This will safeguard her as to any stranger person will not be carried away to approach her for proposals as she is already married. These things had made the earlier generations easier and hassle free lifestyle though they had less amenities and facilities.
Now everything is fast and easy and girls have tried to match head to head with guys that does not mean they should change the norms and not follow. If they wish to bring reforms if so they should do some social work or try to change the face of the country that will at least lead to good.Mere breaking the trends or disregarding the respect for old things wont make any pride.
DHIRAJ CHANDRAKANT KUMBHAR
30 March 2013 at 01:36
I hv filed petition for divorce on desertion ground by husband, summon has been served on him, but he is not cming 2 face d trail, husband hving no property in his name but his father hv land n house, so what shall I do by which ill get something 4 my survival n maintenance
pushpakrishna
29 March 2013 at 22:11
Dear experts,
ABC are own brothers and during the joint family they purchesed a land of 9 Acres from their family income sources in the name of B in the year 1990.During the year 1996 they got Oral partition.but reduced the same in to writing for their reference only and registered.as per the partition 6 Acres alloted to B and 3 acres alloted to A.Since 1997 cultivating the land as per their respective shares.PAHANIES also showing as 6 Acres to B and 3 Acres showing as Partition in favour of A up to 5 years.later not showing.now A and B died.Son of A cultivating the land even now.But 3 sons of B muteted the 9 acres in their favor each 3 Acres behind the screen.the same is reported to the Revenue authorities. but they are not caring.what to do for the justice to get by son of the A .kindly advice.
Alok
29 March 2013 at 20:20
My wife went to her paternal home along with me for the delivery. After the delivery i was busy with my work and use to visit her home when ever i was in her city. Once i was on tour i came to know that my wife had filed for divorce, maintenance and a case on DV act.
Since she was not coming in the proceedings of the court in DV act the result came in my favour. Now the two cases i.e, maintenance and Divorce cases are going on in the court. I am paying Rs. 4000/- as maintenance to my family (Wife and a daughter of 2 years).
I want to know what can i do to save my family since i love my family very much and do not want to give divorce without any reason.
I can do anything so as to save my family from breaking.
Request you to kindly guide me as to what i can do and should do to achieve my objective.
anuradha
29 March 2013 at 20:07
if the case is filed by the husband under the ground of cruelty to husband in 2008 and in 2009 the husband and wife both are came together and living together without any application before the court and pendency of case for the period of one and half year and during the said period their were quarrels and n.c. and cross complaint against each other after that both separated and came in the court.
now the case is on argument stage neither the petitioner advocate amend the plaint and put the facts of their cohabitation and quarrels
now my question is whether the cruelty mentioned in the petition got lapse if the husband and wife came together and it will affect on the case to get the divorce because whatever the evidence on record is the facts which arise between husband and wife is after filling of petition and petitioner advocate not amend the plaint which effect on the divorce case
and what is meaning cruelty lapsed in divorce case
sequence wise can a case u/s 125 cr.p.c. for maintenance and then Domestic violence act and after that a criminal case u/s section 498a/406 ipc may run at the same time in different courts of law .
Venkatadri
29 March 2013 at 17:35
Good Evening Sir,
In charge sheet according to LW – 1’s and her father statement they said on engagement I have given 3 lakhs cash and after engagement I given 3 lakhs cash and after marriage they I have given 2 lakhs cash then the court will question how LW – 1 father earned this money and did her father paid IT on above cash or if LW – 1’s father did not paid IT then LW – 1’s father will be prosecuted or not. Sir, please give information on this.
Venkatadri
29 March 2013 at 16:15
Good evening Sir,
In charge sheet according to LW – 1’s statement and her father’s statement it has mentioned that LW – 1’s father had given 3lakhs cash when LW – 1’s husband demanded as additional dowry.Then sir I heard that giving dowry also a crime then in my case even LW – 1’s father also should be punished or not. Sir, please give information on this.
Preventive step fromm 498a
Sir, b4 married itself wife was a mental patient n as d said fact was suppressed from husband n v hv filed private complaint u/s 406 of ipc n process is also issued against d mother n father of wife n v have also filed divorce petition against wife on insane n fraud ground, so now with n intent 2 take revenge 4m us they r threating us to implicate in 498A, n wife is with her parents.. So what is d preventive step by which I n my family will not suffer 4m d said prosecution.