Anonymous
28 April 2010 at 19:19
is it necessary in criminal cases No objection to vakalatnama of the former advocate,whlie filing my vakalatnama.
if not necessary NOC, then i want relevant citations in this regard,
Sumir
28 April 2010 at 15:05
Company X sponsors an cultural festival of a state government run college, will company X get any tax benefits?
Anonymous
28 April 2010 at 11:30
Respected Experts,
The company is going to file Cheque bounce cases ( Sec. 138 of N.I.Act) against its defaulters. It is very difficult for the M.D. to file and attend the courts and pursue on each matter. Hence the comapany is decided to depute one of its employee to file, attend and pursue the proceedings. So which document is required in this regard. Could you plz. provide the proforma of the document.
Thanking you.
arun bansal
28 April 2010 at 00:43
what remedy available if illegal detained by police whole night to a advocate.
though FIR lodged by process of 156(3) but no progresss shown by police since more than 3 years passed.
Any remedy to get compensation available
under civil or criminal law.
what action against those office who not shown interest to end their investigation.
Anonymous
27 April 2010 at 22:14
I would like to know whether the offence under section 406 I.P.C. is compoundable or not in view of amendment Act of 2008. the offence is of May 2009 and today it is to be compounded. whether it can be permitted by a court
adv.durgadas k.kulkarni
27 April 2010 at 22:03
Respected Experts,
Please give me recent authority of Hon'ble Apex Court on the point of Status-Quo which would grant in favour of plaintiff to restrain defendant(encroacher) to raise construction on the suit property.
Surrender K Singal
27 April 2010 at 20:21
Tot Lot, between A-165 and A-166 in Gujranwala Town Part-1, was being encroached upon by Building-plan-approver Civic Agency with the connivance of Delhi Police, who, unmindful of MCD's ulterior motives, as coaxed by A-166 (who almost a decade ago, tried to usurp this TOT LOT by opening his private entry from his side wall and with iron-mesh grill around this 'neighbourhood facility') for his personal egoist aspirations, came along after most of men-folk of the neighbourhood had left the area for their work-places, thereby minimising resistance in their illegal wall construction motive, as they had come in full force on emergency - WAR level;
In the process, while public exchequer was being emptied for such illegal mis-adventure by MCD (said to be always short of revenue to provide for not only lacking civic amenities but also for ghost employees), a few neighbourers came around to observe the huge Police personnel in dress disproportionate to the meagre illegal boundry wall construction of just 24 feet in front, only to restrict common use of the residents around this TOT LOT.
This is neither MCD land nor MCD property but essentially what is described as TOT LOT in the area plans. , TOT LOT is essentially a small piece of land, so provided in the original Block lay-out plan, as approved since 1970-71, for common use of the neighbourhood residents only, as they may like;.
Mass resident representations were made to the Addl.DCP North West Mr. B.S.Jaiswal, and ACP Smt. Pratibha Sharma, Model Town, and Sh.M.S.Nehra, SHO Model Town. It was shockingly exposed during our meeting with the above senior police officers that the MCD had made a request for police protection to carry out demolitions and stop encroachments. Contrary to their request, what the MCD did was to indulge illegally in encroaching upon our small TOT LOT through the misuse of the police machinery and trying to encroach upon and illegally take over the TOT LOT by intimidating the concerned residents into not offerring any resistance.
Of course, the police force was immediately withdrawn after proper documents and master plans were shown to them. LET DELHI POLCE (already short of staff) be not mis-utilised for such illegal meaningless ulterior motives of MCD and such others who have incited such executives of MCD;
Jai Shree Ram !!
Anonymous
27 April 2010 at 17:51
Respected Experts,
Father has taken amount from me and issued an un-dated Cheque for Rs.1 Lakh. One year back he expired. Now shall I file any case against his LRs for recovery of the said amount. If so plz. Clarity.
adv. rajeev ( rajoo )
27 April 2010 at 17:16
I am representing the accused No:2 in NI Act case.
My defence is that A:2 is no way concerned to the debt which was paid thru., by A:1.
There was partnership, which was dissolved before the issuance of the cheque by A:1.
As such A:2 is not liable for the offence.
And another thing is that before filing the case complainant has not issued a notice to the partnership firm, in my opinion notice to firm is mandatory.
in the cross examination complainant admitted that he has no other income except the business income and also admitted that he has not produced any a/cs of the firm to show amount is paid from the business income. He said that he has paid the amount personally so in my opinion it amount unregd., money lending as such it does not attract NI Act.
i had gone thru., the ruling of Karnataka High Court that unauthorized money lending does not attract the NI Act, it may in the year 1999 reported in ILR Kar.
So please learned members if have any ruling regarding issuance of notice is mandatory to the firm and regarding unauthroised money lending.
Thanks to all.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
enquiry
dear sir,
one of my friend has misused my landline number.he called a girl and though i apolozied to the girl she is threating to lodge a police complaint so how can i get rid of her and the incidence had happened 1 month before does the girl lodge a complaint after 1 month.is there any deadline to lodge a complaint after the crime has happened do let me now.
thanking you.