Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

venkat reddy   27 April 2010 at 08:17

Sec 421,431 of CrPC

what is the purpose when will be the sections 421,431 of crpc will be invoked ?

venkat reddy   27 April 2010 at 08:11

sec 421,431

what is the purpose,what and when it will be invoked ? kindly let me know

Anonymous   27 April 2010 at 02:50

Appeal against direction in Cr.OP

if any direction is issued against me in Cr.OP under 482 than what is the appeal remedy? Whether I can appeal in the same HC or Supreme Court only?

RAJ KUMAR   26 April 2010 at 15:18

forged documents to issue charge sheet

I WAS ISSUED A CHARGE SHEET GETTING FORGED DOCUMENTS MARKED AS MANAGEMENT EXHIBIT. WHEN I POINTED IT THEN IT WAS RESPONDED BY THE ENQUIRY OFFICER IN HIS ENQUIRY REPORT THAT PRESENTING OFFICER HAS NOT USED THESE FOR THE ALLEGATION MARKED FOR. HOW CAN I INITIATE LEGAL ACTION U/S 473 OF IPC AGAINST THE PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR USING THE FORGED DOCUMENTS AGAINST ME TO INDICT ME AND HARRASS ME, THE INSTITUTION IS NOT RESPONDING MY REQUEST TO ALLOW ME TO INITIATE LEGAL ACTION. CAN MY WIFE/MY FRIEND CAN DO SO, KEEPING ME ALOOF. HOW DIRECTLY THROUGH FIR OR BY GIVING NOTICE AND THEN FIR?

dimpy kapoor   26 April 2010 at 14:48

foged documents

my father-in-law & brother-in-law have created the forged voter card of my husband. Voter card is in name of my husband but having a photograph of my brother-in -law and voter card no is different than my husband's voter card. what legal step can be taken

Anonymous   26 April 2010 at 02:15

vicarious liability

my father who was an employee of bharat pumps commpresoor ltd a public sector undertaking.his job was to get deal in insurance related matters of company.he reetired after on superannuation on 31 dec 2000. in 2003 he got a summon from cbi,anti corruption court lucknow saying he is an accused in a case where he processed a claim for the company and got the claim admissible to the company which is 100% subsdiary of govt of india.cbi says that the said marine insurance claim filed by my father on behalf of the company was otherwise not admisible.my qns is wether my father is accused for corruption, secondly he did everything as an employee of a company.he retired at 60 with 34 yrs of service with utmost sincerety.now he is fighting the case by his own,he does not even gets pention,he is 70 yrs now sick with all sort of old age disease.pls advise on:- (i) can a person be accused under sec 13 1 r/w 13 2 ie is corruption,where the said claim has been deposited in account of company of govt of india.
(ii) what is mensrea factor of my father (ie is main ingredient of a crime)
(iii) how can cbi decide that the said insurance claim was inadmissibe and the court without deciding about the admmissibilty of the claim directly started the trial and decide that my father is an accuse and progressed with the case.

jayachandran   25 April 2010 at 11:40

warrant by CJM

A warrant was issued by CJM under Sec.14 of SARFASI Act to take possession.The warrant is still pending. What is the remedy for the borrower.Whether a Criminal Revision is maintainable in District Court. DRT, Chennai had given a decision in some other case that against an order of CJM made under Sec.14, appeal before DRT is not maintainable. Appeal can be filed only if possession is taken.
What is the remedy available

vinod bansal   24 April 2010 at 23:46

plea of alibi in crl revision against summoning order

R/Members
I am representing the complainant in a crl revision against summoning order of magistrate,accused has taken a ground in their revision for setting aside order of summoning on the ground that he was not present at the spot at the time of occurrence rather he was on duty in a bank at that time.There is numerous citations in which courts time and again held that plea of alibi cannot be taken at the stage of revision against summoning order,but presently not a single is available with me.Kindly provide me.Thanx n Regards

vinod bansal   24 April 2010 at 23:39

prima facie case is sufficient for summoning in a pvt compla

R/Members
I am representing in a crl revision against summoning order of magistrate,accused has taken a ground in their revision for setting aside order of summoning on the ground that magistrate has not passed a speaking order,court ought to consider all evidence and than pass an order,as i think prima facie case is sufficient for summoning,court has relied on my citation UP Pollution board..SC and summoned the accused.Kindly suggest me some latest citations on this point in which courts held that prima facie case is sufficient to pass a summoning order in a pvt crl complaint.Thanx

vinod bansal   24 April 2010 at 22:26

Citation for trating appeal as revision by court

R/Members
I wrongly filed crl appeal instead of crl revision against discharge order in a pvt crl complaint before sessions court,limitation is not disputed,kindly suggest me any citation in which it was held that court can treat appeal as reviosion in given facts.Thanx