Anonymous
30 April 2010 at 16:09
in a case of cheque bouncing for rs. 1.63 crores. court had issued nbw to the accused and accused has to appear in the court 1-5-2010. But from my sources i have come to know that accused is not going to appear. MY QUESTION IS WHAT ARE THE OPTIONS WITH THE COURT TO DO AND WHAT SHOULD BE OUR APPROACH IN THIS CASE. ACCUSED IS RIGID NOT TO APPEAR IN THE COURT AND WE GOING THROUGH HEAVY LOSSES. WHAT ARE THE NEXT STAGES AFTER NBW AND HOW CAN ACCCUSE COME UNDER PRESSURE? AND HOW LONG CAN THEY DELAY THE CASE?
Anonymous
30 April 2010 at 14:00
we have got information about a candidate , he has forged marks card of his degree, and using his fake degree has done his MBA full time course which he is not eligible . (basic requirements of MBA is degree with 50% pass marks as per bangalore universtity) we know that he has not passed his degree, after doing a back ground check in his college.,now he has joined a multinational company with his MBA degree, can you please give details how to go about it and wat are the required documents to take action aganist him
He has been cheating many companies with his fake degree. we would like to take action aganist him .
we would like to have detail information how to go about it and who should we approach . how strong legal actions can be taken aganist him .
Anonymous
30 April 2010 at 10:36
Hello,
I am having a matrimonial dispute with my wife. She has filed a false 498a/406 against me in which she has clamied that she and her parents have spent more than 16 lakhs. Out of which she has clamied that her parents has given gold ornaments worth Rs.5,00,000 /-.
For this, she only produces many false & fabricated bills(without VAT/SALES TAX) of one jeweller (copy as attachment).
The jeweller has make statement in front of police officals also that " I HAS SOLD THE JEWELLRY TO HER BUT BY THAT TIME i DON'T HAVE ANY BILL BOOK"
Plz. open the attachment and see..
1. On top it is clearly mentioned as ROUGH ESTIMATE.
2. ROUGH ESTIMATE BILL does not confirm that this type of jewelry have been sold.
3. Should I prosecute that jeweller in sales tax & income tax department, as that person have given a false statement because that jeweller is my wife's neighbour
Anonymous
29 April 2010 at 22:36
HI,
I need to file a criminal case against inaction of police against WB Govt.
Request Expert Criminal Lawyer in this field with record of doing 'STATE VS' cases
Gaurav mishra
29 April 2010 at 17:33
is there any ruling regarding sale permission.for the vehical taken on supurdari from court u\s 451\457 cr. p.c.
Member (Account Deleted)
29 April 2010 at 16:50
Dear All Ld. friends
is any statutory notice of Demanding payment within 15 Days from the date of Notice. (pls give n e judgement if it is less then 15 days)
In demand notice party has to be demand the amount of cheque bounce. if not demand then what will happened. (pls give n e judgement if no demand is made out in notice.)
aassociates
29 April 2010 at 12:20
i want 2 file a complaint u/s. 138 of NIA,1881 but d matter is that the notice was sent to the accuse after 70 days of dishonour of cheque.shall we file a complaint u/s. 420 of IPC?
Anonymous
29 April 2010 at 09:10
I was acquitted from the cases filled under 323, and 506(2) on the ground that witnesses from the government side have turned against and hence there is no evidence to prove. (Could not convey the things correctly - sorry).
The case was filed against me under the influence of my brother and he was the one who gave the false complaint against me in the police. He was the number 1 witness in the case. In the open court he alleged that no such things happened and he had complained the police only because of suspicion that it may occur.
Can I lodge defamation suit against him. What are the other consequences which may pull me into trouble if I do file such suit? Thanking you. I am 67 year old.
==========================================
Kris
29 April 2010 at 06:36
Hi friends,
My query is that; Complainant has been handed over a cheque by a partnership firm in lieu of legal discharge of debt but failed to repay accordingly a notice was issued addressing two partners rep. by their partnership firm to pay the debt. The complaint has been filed before the magistrate and now one of the partner has come up with a plea that the cheque does not belong to him as he has not issued the same and he alleges that his other partner has a signature bearing on the cheque and it is a personal affair between the complainant and his other partner. However, the other partner (the person who issued the cheque)has not chosen to take the notice and summons are not being served as he is absconding and his address cannot be traced. Now at this juncture can a petition U/s.482 or any other relevant provision be filed by the complainant directing the court to order for paper publication on behalf of the other partner. As the cheque was issued to the complainant in the capacity of the partnership by misleading the complainant saying that the absconding partner is authorized signatory on behalf of the partnership affairs, but the fact remains that it is an individual bank account of the absconding partner and does not belong to the firm.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
138 N.I. act
i am for the complainant. i have filed a 138 case in kurla metropolitan court for 6 lakh rupees. summons was issued to the accused with was return back saying the door of accused house is closed. thereafter the hon'ble court was please to issue a bailable warrant which was came back with the same report as the summons came back after this a N.B.W was issued against the accused which also came back. now the question is the house in which the accused is staying is not his. i think so he must have bribe the concern police so they are giving such report.so please guide me what to do in such sitution. contact 9892115025