Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Vijay Kumar   05 August 2008 at 18:44

joint complaint

Is complaint by two persons maintainable?
I have come across a Madras High Court Judgement titled as " R.Krishnamurthy v. M.P.Raja" 1989 L.W.( Cr.)186 at 187. I am in Punjab, hence have not access to above law journal. Can you help?

RADHA PYARI SRIPADA   05 August 2008 at 14:01

offence u/s.138

whether personal appearance of the accused be exempted in a criminal case u/s.138, NI Act if the party is attempting to settle the matter in installments and part payment is already made in the court?

advocate satya   05 August 2008 at 13:19

electricity theft

sir
one person is booked for theft of electricity as a electric line was connected from direct line to one of the welding machine, the special court imposed and ordered to pay rs 1 lac to electricity company and the bill / charges given by electric company is rs 8.5 lac , the bail is given to the accused on this condition only that rs 1 lac should be deposited to the electric company, still the trial has not completed.
my question is
1. can special court order of conditional bail prior to completion of trial is fair?
2. is any judgement is there in relevance to this case??
3. can the person go for appeal and under which grounds?
4 any other suggestion.

nitin   04 August 2008 at 17:51

maintenance

whether a wife who have been divorced on mutual consent of her, on the basis of customary law is entitled for maintence
and if the husband had married again after that divorse

can any of my fellow member send me the latest authority on this point

advocate satya   04 August 2008 at 16:04

impersonation

how can a case of impersonation be filed if someone sticks a sticker of advocate into his vehicle though he is not an advocate?

qumarsanjeev   04 August 2008 at 12:35

what to do

I've a client whose friend took personal loan fron SBI and my client is guaranter after paying some installment he stopped paying installment b'cause my client is guaranter let me clear he is Tisco employee and his salary goes to SBI bank .As i mentioned earlier he is guarante that's why his salary has been blocked by SBI for 2-3 years please suggest me what to do .Is it legal blocking his all salary by SBI.

Shekhar   03 August 2008 at 01:12

Condem of high court order

There is a case regarding quashe of FIR, now order on 22-april -2008 from the court to stay on the proceedings till the next date of hearing which was on 8th may 2008 to state as well as to PS & IO, but IO has filed the charge sheet on 2nd of may 2008 then on 8th court has demanded the explanation from the state as well as from the IO " inspite of stay why? charge sheet has been filed, there in reply IO has demanded the unconditional apologies from the court that she(IO) did not notice "Stay"... Pls. give me the advise how to go about it? and can i approach to the junction where the charge sheet has been filed, pls. guide me the way out of this!!!! Thanks, Shekhar

bhagwant   02 August 2008 at 18:04

Complaint of Motor Accident.

When there is accident between motor cycle and truck, and if motorcyclist get injured and admitted directly to hospital or left from the place, and if truck driver files complaint against motorcyclist u/s.279 IPC 184 MV Act, even after having negligence on his part. It is reveled after investigation that motor cyclist was not wrong, what will be effect on the complaint, who complaint will dispose off, whether chargsheet against truck driver can be filed.

bhagwant   02 August 2008 at 12:25

Indian Penal Code

It is observed that Sec.427 is applied with Sec.279 IPC in Motor Vehcile accident Casses. My query is that for the purpose of mischief intention is necessary, and there is no intention to cause damage in Motor Vehicle Accidents, then how 427 is applicable with 279. Do any body have views from Apex Court, please send me.

Ladhu Ram Chowdhary   02 August 2008 at 07:19

sec.323 cr.p.c.

case fixed for judgment and from the evidence Magistrate found that offence u/s 397 I.P.C.appears to made outand it is triable by only court of session -Magistrate is emprowered u/s .323 to exercise the power before signing the judgment ?