138n.i.act,produce photocopy only ledger

138 n.i.act ke vad main ek dukandar ne case kiya hai ki usne alag alag billo main,mal becha,jisme final hisab kar use 90000 ka chek mila, usne cross main bill book,ledger book,recipt book va income tax return file karna accept kiya,kintu parivad ke sath keval ledger ki photo copy file kari, ledger ka hisab bhi 90405 ka hai, 405 ka koi jikra nahi, my question......... kya usse 91 ka aavedan dekar mool ledger,bill book, receipt book ki mang ki jave, ya na kiya jave,.......... yadi vah proper book khud nahi pesh karege to accused ko kya benifit hai

ipc 376

the prosecutrix says that she allowed sexual intercourse because male partner assured her and give promise that he would marry with her. then male partner says "no"
Female is age of 20 yrs and male partner is 22 years and both are from different communities.she says that she gave a consent because of that promise. whether offence of i.p.c.376 is preprepared? what is the impact of section 90 of i.p.c.? it means consent

misconduct of court staff

I would like to draw attention to the recent act of misconduct by the typist of the warangal cout by throwing the footware on the honourable judge in the court. I would like to know what action would be taken by the authorities concerned.

pendency of civil case a bar to move a criminal writ petitio

Whether a Principal Session Judge can impose a cost?

Whether a Principal Session Judge (PSJ) can impose a cost on any applicant,who moves transfer application before him u/s 408 of Cr.P.C.?
In the abovesaid case,a transfer application was dismissed and despite it,the said case was transferred to other session Judge on "administrative grounds"and while dismissing the said transfer application,a cost of Rs.5000/- was imposed on the said applicant for "making wild allegations" against the session judge from whose court the said case was ultimately transferred by PSJ.
In the light of the above,since there is no provision u/s 408 to impose cost and under what authority and or section,the said cost was imposed on an aggrieved party?
To challenge this harsh order,what remedies are available and case laws or authorities,if available with any esteemed experts,shall be highly appreciated.
Amar

Investigations before registration of case.

Can the police, vigilance or CBI conduct investigation before registration of case?

SAVE FROM HDFC GANG AND POLICE

HI FRIENDS
I LIKE TO HELP PEOPLE AS A SOCIAL WORK WHEN I AM FREE FROM MY WORK.
C IS A POOR FARMER. C PURCHASED SECOND HAND TV STARCITY BIKE IN THE MONTH MARCH OF 2009 PAYING CASH RS 26000 IN INSTALMENTS TO B AND THEN TRANSFERED BY NAME OF C AS PER PROCEDURE AT RTO OFFICE AT AURANGABAD, MAHARASHTRA.A WAS FIRST OWNER OF BIKE AS PER THE RECORDS OF RTO AND A WAS TRANSFERED BIKE TO B AND THEN FROM B TO C.
RTO RECORD SHOWS BIKE BELONGS TO C TODAY.
ON 29/01/2010 2 , when C was at taluka place with his PREGNANT wife and two year old daughter, a team of recovery of HDFC bank forcefully taken possession of above said bike at public place.witnesses are also there. C moved to police station to register FIR at taluka police station.Instead of registering FIR, police officer on duty has taken his complaint application without giving 'received' to C and also[ RS 500 as gobar].
police officer advised C TO MEET OFFICERS OF HDFC BANK.when C approached to bank maneger at Aurangabad with original RC book of bike,BANK OFFICERS TAKEN RC BOOK FOR VERIFICATION AND NOT RETURNED TILL TODAY.
2 DAYS BEFORE I GOT THE KNOWLEDGE OF SAME. WHEN I APPROACHED TO POLICE STATION AT TALUKA PLACE ,EVEN POLICE WAS NOT SERIALED THAT APPLICATION. ON 25 TH C HAS GIVEN FRESH APPLICATION TO POLICE WITH 'RECEIVED' BUT POLICE IS NOT TAKING ANY ACTION AND NOT REGISTERED FIR TILL TODAY.
ACTUALLY A WAS TAKEN VEHICAL LOAN FROM HDFC BANK . BANK DOCUMENT SHOWS BIKE OWNER IS A AND ALSO ITS DEFAULTER. BUT TODAYS RTO RECORD SHOWS OWNER IS C.
WHAT TO DO NOW? POLICE HELPING TO BANK OFFICERs intentionlly.C NEEDS UR HELP.PLEASE GUIDE.

138 negotiable instruments act

issued notice U/s.138(B) of the N.I. act to the accused, where he was running business. the notice returned with an endorsement, door always locked. does it amounts to service?

sc & st act

U/s.3(1)(X)of sc and st act, it is stated that the occurance should have taken place in public view in any place. My question is when an official abuses a co worker or sub ordinate inside his official cabin, is it a place of public view?. what is the exact meaning of public view?. In the instant case 3 staffs have been roped in as eye witnesses. But in the complaint, he has only stated that the accused abused him by calling by caste, he never told who witnessed the occurance. only in the 161 statement and while deposing in the court he developed theory. when few staffs alleged to have witnessed the occurance, whether they will be treated as public? or Private?
regards
sai suresh

Violation of J J Act.

A teacher of an unaided school punished the students studying III standard. The teacher asked the children to stand on their knee for one hour and thereafter to suck the floor of the class.The matter is brought to the notice of CWC and they have taken evidence. What all actions are to be taken against the teacher who had assaulted the children? Who is to take action? CWC? The provisions under JJ Act or CrPC? A detailed advice with the provisions of the Acts may be furnished.