324 of I P C

Dear Sir,
In 324 of I P C the Complainant narrated the incindent, and pw 2 turned hostile, pw3 & 4 are interested witness they corrabarated with the complainant, and pw 7 is the doctor, who explained injury but not cited in the wound certificate about the object, pw 8 is investigating officer not recovered any object from scence of offence as stated in the 161 statement.
please send the latest judjement in this regard.

Contradiction in FIR

Ld counsels,

How contradicting statement made by complainant will be viewed by criminal court.

When the contradiction is of such a nature that the two statement cannot be fatually possible or co-exist.

Also how different versions of an incident will be viewed.

Please clarify. Thanks

bank ne chek accept nahi kiya,phir bhi memo hai

sir, .. .. . very very intersting, pahle bat ko samajhe pls..... jab koi bank main check ya cash jama karta hai to bank ka ek boucher bharta hai,jiske 2 bhag hote hai,ek jise bank jamakarta ko vapas karta hai, va dusre bhag ko bank chahe check ka owner kare ya disowner, apne pas rakhta hai, bank memo ki vaidyta par object karne par bank apne record se vahi memo court main prastut karta hai,. . . .. .. ... . .. ... 138 ke ek case main parivadi ne bank voucher ka vah bhag jo bank record main rahta hai,vah mul bhag court main prastut kar diya hai, ukt bhag, ya chek par bank ki koi remark ya seal nahi hai,jisse pata chale ki check bank main prastut hua ....... i think, parivadi bank main chek lekar gaya hi nahi ya gaya bhi to bank valo ne account ka koi record computer main na hone se check accept nahi kiya, kyoki account kafi din pahle se band tha, va coputri karan ke bad aise band account computer main nahi liye gaye honge....... bad main parivadi ne kisi bank karmi se santh ganth kar bank memo hasil kar liya hoga,,,,,bank memo main na to parivadi , na hi abhiyukt ke acoount no hai, va para 16 main tick hai, jismain likha hai no account/account close on advice. . .. .. ... . .. ... ab kya kanooni sthithi hai

138n.i.act,produce photocopy only ledger

138 n.i.act ke vad main ek dukandar ne case kiya hai ki usne alag alag billo main,mal becha,jisme final hisab kar use 90000 ka chek mila, usne cross main bill book,ledger book,recipt book va income tax return file karna accept kiya,kintu parivad ke sath keval ledger ki photo copy file kari, ledger ka hisab bhi 90405 ka hai, 405 ka koi jikra nahi, my question......... kya usse 91 ka aavedan dekar mool ledger,bill book, receipt book ki mang ki jave, ya na kiya jave,.......... yadi vah proper book khud nahi pesh karege to accused ko kya benifit hai

ipc 376

the prosecutrix says that she allowed sexual intercourse because male partner assured her and give promise that he would marry with her. then male partner says "no"
Female is age of 20 yrs and male partner is 22 years and both are from different communities.she says that she gave a consent because of that promise. whether offence of i.p.c.376 is preprepared? what is the impact of section 90 of i.p.c.? it means consent

misconduct of court staff

I would like to draw attention to the recent act of misconduct by the typist of the warangal cout by throwing the footware on the honourable judge in the court. I would like to know what action would be taken by the authorities concerned.

pendency of civil case a bar to move a criminal writ petitio

Whether a Principal Session Judge can impose a cost?

Whether a Principal Session Judge (PSJ) can impose a cost on any applicant,who moves transfer application before him u/s 408 of Cr.P.C.?
In the abovesaid case,a transfer application was dismissed and despite it,the said case was transferred to other session Judge on "administrative grounds"and while dismissing the said transfer application,a cost of Rs.5000/- was imposed on the said applicant for "making wild allegations" against the session judge from whose court the said case was ultimately transferred by PSJ.
In the light of the above,since there is no provision u/s 408 to impose cost and under what authority and or section,the said cost was imposed on an aggrieved party?
To challenge this harsh order,what remedies are available and case laws or authorities,if available with any esteemed experts,shall be highly appreciated.
Amar

Investigations before registration of case.

Can the police, vigilance or CBI conduct investigation before registration of case?

SAVE FROM HDFC GANG AND POLICE

HI FRIENDS
I LIKE TO HELP PEOPLE AS A SOCIAL WORK WHEN I AM FREE FROM MY WORK.
C IS A POOR FARMER. C PURCHASED SECOND HAND TV STARCITY BIKE IN THE MONTH MARCH OF 2009 PAYING CASH RS 26000 IN INSTALMENTS TO B AND THEN TRANSFERED BY NAME OF C AS PER PROCEDURE AT RTO OFFICE AT AURANGABAD, MAHARASHTRA.A WAS FIRST OWNER OF BIKE AS PER THE RECORDS OF RTO AND A WAS TRANSFERED BIKE TO B AND THEN FROM B TO C.
RTO RECORD SHOWS BIKE BELONGS TO C TODAY.
ON 29/01/2010 2 , when C was at taluka place with his PREGNANT wife and two year old daughter, a team of recovery of HDFC bank forcefully taken possession of above said bike at public place.witnesses are also there. C moved to police station to register FIR at taluka police station.Instead of registering FIR, police officer on duty has taken his complaint application without giving 'received' to C and also[ RS 500 as gobar].
police officer advised C TO MEET OFFICERS OF HDFC BANK.when C approached to bank maneger at Aurangabad with original RC book of bike,BANK OFFICERS TAKEN RC BOOK FOR VERIFICATION AND NOT RETURNED TILL TODAY.
2 DAYS BEFORE I GOT THE KNOWLEDGE OF SAME. WHEN I APPROACHED TO POLICE STATION AT TALUKA PLACE ,EVEN POLICE WAS NOT SERIALED THAT APPLICATION. ON 25 TH C HAS GIVEN FRESH APPLICATION TO POLICE WITH 'RECEIVED' BUT POLICE IS NOT TAKING ANY ACTION AND NOT REGISTERED FIR TILL TODAY.
ACTUALLY A WAS TAKEN VEHICAL LOAN FROM HDFC BANK . BANK DOCUMENT SHOWS BIKE OWNER IS A AND ALSO ITS DEFAULTER. BUT TODAYS RTO RECORD SHOWS OWNER IS C.
WHAT TO DO NOW? POLICE HELPING TO BANK OFFICERs intentionlly.C NEEDS UR HELP.PLEASE GUIDE.