P.C. Joshi
25 February 2010 at 23:30
Dear Friends,
Pls advise me on the following qury.
A ltd has supplied certain goods to ABC a proprietorship concern during the year 2007-08 and an amount of Rs 18 lacs is overdue from ABC. The proprietor of ABC was some Mrs X who expired in Nov 2007 and his sons have now taken over the business. In fact at the time of supplies by A Ltd also their mother was proprietor only for name sake the busisness was being managed by sons only.
ABC is not aking payment to A ltd for which A Ltd is undoubtedly file a civil recovery suit. But A ltd is insisting on filing an FIR for cheating and fraud and file a criminal suit.
On the basis of above facts learned members are requted to share their views on the maintainability of a criminal suit in the matter and under which sections of IPC.
Regards
P.c. Joshi
Anonymous
25 February 2010 at 22:06
dear sir
i was issue cheque to the party (company) . party cheated me . than i given stop payment instruction to the bank cheque was deposited in ahmedabad and also return to ahmedabad branch
and i have been all dealing with ahmedabad branch
but they issue notice me from mumbai and file complaint in mumbai court for harassment
my question is ?
where is proper jurisdiction?
also send me supremecourt judgement to transfer case
pls
Anonymous
25 February 2010 at 21:59
My father has taken a khaprail house on rent since 1967 i.e. 43 years ago to start a school. Now the land lord is directing to vacate the same. But, he has filed a petition with SDO u/s 133 of Cr.P.C. with the reason that the house is too old and it will collaspe any time. two years has passed after submitting the petition. but, the house has not yet been collasped.
Sir, tell me whether this petition is maintainable u/s 133 of Cr.P.C. with suitable reason.
Thanking you.
Arvind Singh Chauhan
25 February 2010 at 21:46
Offence under SEC and 65 of Copy right act is bailable or non bailable. I am confused please help.
D. Goswami
25 February 2010 at 20:58
Court cannot grant excess amount of maintenence which is not claimed by the petitioner in her petition u/s 125 of cr.p c.Pls gave citation in respect of that.Thanks.
Anonymous
25 February 2010 at 20:30
Whether a female child of seven and a half months could be said to be possessed of 'modesty' which could be outraged u/s 354 IPC
GIRISH AGRAWAL
25 February 2010 at 19:07
I AM A COMPLAINANT.
I FILE WRITTEN COMPLAIN IN CITY KOTWALI DURG (C.G.) AGINST FIVE ACCUSE TO CHEATS ME AND ALSO PROVID MANY EVIDENCES WITH MY WRITTEN COMPLAIN.
BUT
AFTER MORE THAN SIX MONTH...
CITY KOTWALI POLICE DURG WAS NOT INTERESTED TO REGISTERD CASE BECAUSE THE SAID ACCUCE IN MY COMPLAIN ARE BIG POLITICAL LINK
SO I APPLIED THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 TO PIO CITY KOTWALI DURG & ASK QUSTIONS RELATIONG MY WRITTEN COMPLAIN DATED 27 JULY 2009:-
I ASKED QUSTIONS TO PIO :-
(1)Why do not registered case after six month in my written complain dated 27 July 2009
(2)I want to copy of Daily General dairy which has entry my written complain.
(3)I want to copy of my statements which has written by investigation officer in my case.
THE P.I.O DOES'NT GIVE ME ANSWER MY ANY QUSTIONS AND HE SAID TO ME-
ABOVE INFORMATION ARE NOT PROVIDED TO YOU
BECAUSE U/S 8(1)(h) of the RTI act
“Information, which would impede the process of investigation of apprehension of prosecution of offenders”
PIO DO NOT GAVE ME ANY INFORMATIONS..
MY QUERRY ARE….
--------------
Is Exempt above information u/s 8(1)(h) under
The Right to Information Act 2005 regarding my written complain in police ?
What can I do ?
D. Goswami
25 February 2010 at 17:05
xerox copy of lawyer's notice is whether admissible at the time of evidence.Pl. also give me some citations.Thanks.
Anonymous
25 February 2010 at 14:52
hi
i would like to know is there any time limit for callenging the bogus will ?
one of my uncle and his children fabricate forged the signature of diseased uncle .its an unregistered white sheet will .
the will dated 6-6-96 .
my question is
1.is there any time limit for challenging the will ?
regards
AGrao
pls let ma
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
138 Negotiable Instrument Act
In a case I am on the side of accused
I had called the independant Bank witness and I am takies his Oral Exam-in-chief
the cross is not taken by the complainannt yet.
Whether I can cross examine the witness which has been called by me
If yes, Pls provide provision and case laws''
Thanks
Regards