GIRISH AGRAWAL
23 February 2010 at 14:37
RESPECTED EXPERTS....!!!!
I FILED RTI TO POLICE FOR GIVE ME A COPY OF GENERAL DAIRY RELATED MY WRITTEN COMPLAIN.
BUT POLICE DOES NOT GIVE ME COPY OF GENERAL DAIRY. HE SAID THAT THE GENREL DAIRY HAS BEEN A CONFIDANTIAL DOCUMENTS.
(PLEASE NOTE -I WANT TO DAILY GENERAL DAIRY NOT A CASE DAIRY )
WHAT CAN I DU ?
GIRISH AGRAWAL
Anonymous
23 February 2010 at 12:57
is section 498A compoundable, if later the husband and wife files a petition for divorce on mutual consent and the petition is allowed.
Anonymous
23 February 2010 at 11:25
(i) whether an order directing framing of charge or framing charge, in a case attracting the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is an interlocutory order and (ii) whether such an order can be challenged by way of (a) Revision Petition or (b) petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or (c) petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution.
Anonymous
23 February 2010 at 11:16
Can the obscene/porn website be blocked / banned by invoking the Section 69A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 read with the Information Technology (Procedures and safeguards for Blocking of Access of Information by Public) Rules 2009?
Member (Account Deleted)
23 February 2010 at 09:38
Facts---A prosecution witness name was in the list of witnesses. After all efforts he didn't appeared before court for evidence. Prosecution evidence closed.. Statement of accused has been taken under section 313 Cr.P.C.. In defence evidence that witness i.e. earlier prosecution witness, appeared before court as a defence witness.
querry----`. Whether the prosecution has the right to contradict from his previous statements which were taken under section 161 Cr.P.C.?
thanks.
girish kodarlal bhavsar
22 February 2010 at 20:07
If the cover of sttutory notice by RPAD may return with endorsement that the Adress is in complite in spite of that the UPC is not return by the same andorsement can the holder of the cheque can file Complaint u\s 138 of Negotiable Act ? whwther the Complaint is tanable and maintainable provided under the N.A. act?
Kris
22 February 2010 at 13:22
Hi Friends!!
Can accused file any petition (if so under which provision of CR.P.C)seeking protection from complainants in a criminal case pending adjudication before the court, as the complainants are threatning the accused with dire consequences whenever he is attending the court on every date of listing. The Police has not yet filed Charge Sheet and the Accused got bail. Can I file a dispense with petition for the presence of the accused as alternate option if protection petition cannot be granted? Kindly suggest your valuable advises.
Thanks.
Sumir
22 February 2010 at 12:58
I had given practical exam, during which the examiners gave marks with pencil initially and latter these were manipulated. I had filed an RTI with university, if it is allowed to give marks in pencil during practicals initially, and latter change. Despite of no such written information, the university stated that yes it is allowed, in fact, justified it saying that this avoid mathematical mistake and cancellation etc.
It is possible to ask for reexamination? what are chances of wining the case, and under what time, please help urgently.
(exams were held in December 09, result declared on 10th FEB, 2010; myself has failed)
Anonymous
22 February 2010 at 12:19
Mr. X is a property dealer with many investments around the country. Mr. Y is an Indian businessman based abroad but interested in making an investment in India. Mr. X proposes a hotel investment to Mr. Y. Mr. Y is interested and makes multiple cheque payments addressed in the name of Mr. X to be invested towards the hotel project. After a few months X and Y register a partnership firm for the project, and Y pays some more cheques in the name of the partnership towards funds for the project.
In the meantime Mr. X is making another investment and asks Y if he would be interested in the project. Since Y was leaving India the next day, he pays a cheque for investment towards this other project to X. He tells X that there is no money in the account and he will advise X on when to present the cheque. Later in the evening, Y decides not to be part of the new project since it is not part of their partneship. Y calls X informing him, and asking him to destroy the cheque. X assures Y that the cheque is destroyed.
X and Y continue their relationship on their partnership project and Y pays another cheque to X. When X asks for more funds, Y arranges an investor to the project. The investor asks to see the project papers and books of the partnership before making the investment. At this point X refuses to show any documents. Therefore the investor that Y brought does not commit any money. This upsets Y who feels X is not investing the money in the project correctly. He also refuses to contribute any further money to the project.
About 4-5 later, without informing Y, X submits the cheque that he should have destroyed. The cheque bounces due to lack of funds. X then files a case against Y under NI section 138 and thier is a summon recived from court.
How should Y approach this case? He is still a director in the partnership firm with X but thier relations have now soured.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
FRAUD
"A" met to "B" and said to him that "A" is working in a company, which provides articles in cheap rate to small shop keeper in lieu of a one time deposit of Rs 2500/-. "A" assured to "B" that "B" may be an employee under "A", pay Rs 6000/- shall be paid to "B" and "B" has to make members. No appointment letter was issued to "B". "B" agreed and make some members in his relation also. In doing so "A" was also with "B" as a promoting officer to satisfy the people with the scheme. From the receipts which were given to the members some were bearing "A" signature and some were "B"'s signature. Receipt book is with "B".Later on A left the all dealing and said company has been closed. Now the people are asking money from "B". What action can be taken against "A" on behalf of "B" please advice. Whether recovery of money is possible?