Sukhija
26 February 2010 at 19:19
Hi
Can a non banking company legally give loan to any person without having any license for the same.
loan with interest is given by the company to my client. company officer says that it is not applicable for his company to have license from any body. is it right?
Anonymous
26 February 2010 at 18:56
Dear sir,
I have appear on behalf of a accused in the case of u/s.138 of N.I.Act. this matter is now keep for plea.
But I found some tecnical and law points on which no offence is made out.
i) accused is a chairman of a Cr.society and at the time of cheque bounse accused was resigned from society.
ii) in that complaint complainant added only chairman and manager as accused.
So please advise me whether I can file a application for discharge of accused before plea of accused or not.
Or Can I have file a Revision for recall of process?
Please Reply. it's Urgent.
darshan
26 February 2010 at 18:43
I have contested the matter before charge and taken cross examination and argued at the time of EBC.
after hearing argument the Hon'ble court find that no charge is framed in that complaint and discharged the accused person.
Now I want to know that whether the aquital (accused) person can filed a complaint for defamation and can he also claim for compansation for this false complaint?.
Please advise me.
manish
26 February 2010 at 17:51
I need to know any authority on the following facts.........
That that husband has been directed to pay maintanance to her wife and revision hasbeen filed against the said order.
The point i would like to know is that one witness was examined in defence of husband's caseIN LOWER COURT and his examination in chief was recorded but the cross was deferred as court timewas over.On next date the presiding officer was on leave and on next date an application was moved for adjournment as the said witness was not present but the said application was rejected and the LOWER court passed the order and as such the testimony of this witness was left out of consideration.AS such no opportunity to prove his case was given to husband
The point i would i like to know whether the matter can be remanded by the sessions court to lower court in these set of circumstances and is there any authority in this regard
vijay
26 February 2010 at 09:32
What is the address to send complaint to press club of chennai for defamatory statment made in one news paper.
Chetan
26 February 2010 at 08:04
In a case I am on the side of accused
I had called the independant Bank witness and I am takies his Oral Exam-in-chief
the cross is not taken by the complainannt yet.
Whether I can cross examine the witness which has been called by me
If yes, Pls provide provision and case laws''
Thanks
Regards
P.C. Joshi
25 February 2010 at 23:30
Dear Friends,
Pls advise me on the following qury.
A ltd has supplied certain goods to ABC a proprietorship concern during the year 2007-08 and an amount of Rs 18 lacs is overdue from ABC. The proprietor of ABC was some Mrs X who expired in Nov 2007 and his sons have now taken over the business. In fact at the time of supplies by A Ltd also their mother was proprietor only for name sake the busisness was being managed by sons only.
ABC is not aking payment to A ltd for which A Ltd is undoubtedly file a civil recovery suit. But A ltd is insisting on filing an FIR for cheating and fraud and file a criminal suit.
On the basis of above facts learned members are requted to share their views on the maintainability of a criminal suit in the matter and under which sections of IPC.
Regards
P.c. Joshi
Anonymous
25 February 2010 at 22:06
dear sir
i was issue cheque to the party (company) . party cheated me . than i given stop payment instruction to the bank cheque was deposited in ahmedabad and also return to ahmedabad branch
and i have been all dealing with ahmedabad branch
but they issue notice me from mumbai and file complaint in mumbai court for harassment
my question is ?
where is proper jurisdiction?
also send me supremecourt judgement to transfer case
pls
Anonymous
25 February 2010 at 21:59
My father has taken a khaprail house on rent since 1967 i.e. 43 years ago to start a school. Now the land lord is directing to vacate the same. But, he has filed a petition with SDO u/s 133 of Cr.P.C. with the reason that the house is too old and it will collaspe any time. two years has passed after submitting the petition. but, the house has not yet been collasped.
Sir, tell me whether this petition is maintainable u/s 133 of Cr.P.C. with suitable reason.
Thanking you.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
138 N.I.Act
in a case the accused applied to the bank for stop payment before depositing the cheque, the bank did not do so. Will the bqank be responsible u/sec. 138 N.I.Act ?