Anonymous
15 May 2010 at 17:54
cheque is given for security purpose and complainant deposited security cheque. i want judgement for such.
Anonymous
15 May 2010 at 08:46
deposition of one DW one PW contradits each other regarding a particular document.
DW was not cross-examined on that point though PW was.
no other witness of either side made any statement regarding that docu.
who's statement will stand?
is there any relevant judgement?
Anonymous
14 May 2010 at 19:36
Dear Sirs,
Is anticipatory bail usually granted in a section 498A case? If a family seeks anticipatory bail, will it cast a suspicion on their behaviour towards their daughter in law? Thanks.
Anonymous
14 May 2010 at 16:06
Whether it is mandatory to lodge complaint before police prior to file complaint under section 200 Cr.P.C. Kindly suggest me.
aassociates
14 May 2010 at 12:51
can v file a private complaint of sec.420 without logding a F.I.R ?
Anonymous
14 May 2010 at 11:52
Dear Sir/Madam
For the last 7+ years my life has been made miserable. my father expired in due course due to harrassment for dowry demand unable to meet. my husband works in dubai and his family here in india, he got married with a lady abonding me and my daughter. i waited for 5+ years then took extreme step of filing a case in local p.s. and he got arrested in indian airport in 2009 and release on bail. he sends me messages saying that he will not divorce me nor accepts me whatever. it is truly genuine 498A case, no doubt, i have not asked for any compensation and will not do. I want he and his people to learn lesson and i want justice for my real and sincere effort.
my query is how can i nullify or void his second marriage. i want to knock the door of supreme court for justice.
please suggest way to approach supreme court through the same P.S. with the same crime number. concern PP and P.S.is dealing the case.
waiting for your reply sincerely.
Anonymous
14 May 2010 at 11:20
Statment u/s 161 of Cr.P.C made before police officials is binding upon the parties/accused/witness. What is the legal validity of statment u/s 161 in trial?
Thyagarajan
13 May 2010 at 19:34
Cases under section 199, 200, 205 to 211 IPC are to be taken up by courts themselves(as per 195 and 340 of Criminal procedure code, but supreme court has set some bar which allows private party to put a case under section 199, 200, 205 to 211 IPC). The judge can take up the false information case by himself, on base of an application u/s 340 Cr.PC, this would carry more gravity since its a case initiated and executed by the judge. But if the respective courts do not take up these cases (which is usually the case) then file for private cases under sections 199, 200, 205 to 211 IPC (citing the bar Supreme court has set, enabling private parties to initiate such cases.
Can any of the Layer Members give me the case in which SC gave the ruling?
Anonymous
13 May 2010 at 17:54
My so called friend "K" on whom his wife has put cases under 498A,406 r/w 34. Futher she has put a domestic violence case also. In reply to her complain, my so called friend "K" has filed his "say", where to save himself he has mentioned this "Opponent No.1 (K) is not aware if any conversation took place between Applicant (that is his wife) and "A"(thats me) on his back. Moreover he is not responsible for any such talks between the Applicant (that is his wife) & A (thats me)if it is made without his knowledge"
This is total lies I have never met that girl (his wife) in his absense & this even the girl (his wife) will agree. To save himself he is simply dragging me into this matter & spoiling my name. Can a case of defamation be put against him & can that girl (his wife) also do the same
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Impact of Newly inserted Sec 313(5)
TO ALL MEMBERS
PLS DELIBERATE ON THE IMPACT OF NEWLY INSERTED SS5 TO SEC 313
RELATED FORUM QUERY SEC 313(5) AND CRML AMDT ACT 2008 WEF 31/12/2009
SANJEEW