Anonymous
30 August 2011 at 22:27
Question: IF ANY BODY KNOWS THE RECENT JUDGEMENT OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN FAVOUR OF THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF RELIGION. IT MEANS IF THE CHILD WANT TO ADOPT THE RELIGION OF HIS MOTHER THAN THERE IS NO COMPLUSION THAT THE FATHER RELIGION OR SURNAME ONLY SHOULD BE ACCEPPTED DO HIGHLIGHT ON THIS ISSUE PLS.
ALSO What do u mean by misc. criminal cases ? ANY EXAMPLE.
tHaNKS.
Anonymous
30 August 2011 at 22:25
179. Offence triable where act is done or consequence ensues.
When an act is an offence, due to anything, which has been done, and of a consequence, which has ensued, the offence may be inquired into or tried by a court within whose local jurisdiction such thing has been done or such consequence has ensued.
What does this section want to say. any judgment can explain.
dear experts ,
I AM ADV. ASHWINI PARDAHE . MY QUERY IS THAT WHAT IS SEC.202 OF CRPC .PLEASE EXPLAIN DESCRIPTIVELY.
THANKS
gaurav
30 August 2011 at 20:22
sir, cann you plz tel me the authorities to which complaint againt illegal money lending can be lodged. its very urgent and plz guide me under which section complaint is lodged under punjab money lending act?wthr complaint can be made to c.b.i or lokaayukt or public grievance commision?
abhi sharama
30 August 2011 at 19:15
if a person is sent to jail by cbi charges ( sec-120B,420,467,468,471A)currently he spent 6-7 month until final investigation get over ( charges produce in court in 90 days), lastly final challan issued in court including others on same case, now what the chance of bail, earleir lower court rejected the bail.what will now the chance of bail. as
the trail is going to start in few days...
anish
30 August 2011 at 17:12
My Father expired 9 years back leaving behind a WILL wherein I was made executor. Since younger brother was notorious he was excluded and kept aside from WILL except certain bequeaths. After death all legal heirs read the WILL and letters were given to them explaining provision applicable to them. Replies were received from each heir including notorious brother that they have no objection to WILL. Since no immovable properties were in Mumbai probate was not taken. Certain immovable properties were in Nasik . To give effect to transfer these properties as per father’s wish WILL was subsequently registered with sub registrarunder sec 40(1) of Registration Act and properties were transferred accordingly seven years back. Now the notorious brother has started giving notices that WILL was forged and consents given by him are also forged and I along with witnesses have forged this WILL. Witnesses can very well prove that father had signed WILL in front of them & even if my brother threatens them to say otherwise witnesses while registering WILL have given affidavit in front of sub-registrar that my father had signed in their presence. However brother is alleging that he will prove that will is forged by sending it to forensic lab by court order. We have taken expert opinion of about father’s signature. Since father was not well and feeling weak he had signed WILL slowly and consciously. Brother is alleging that signs are traced and forged. In our opinion WILL is always proved by witnesses signature. This is a civil matter. How can forgery allegations be made after so many years? Please let us know our defense in this case as we do not know what forensic report may reveal.
Further brother has managed police station and has given an application that very grave crime of forgery and preparation of bogus WILL is committed 9 years back & police is calling me to file my answer. In my opinion proving genuineness of WILL is civil matter and should be tried in civil court .
My queries are:
1) Can my Brother make such forgery allegations after 9 years even though he is aware of WILL.?
2) Witness testimony is main evidence and when witnesses testify that my father has signed in their presence how can forgery allegations stand?
3) How do I tell police authorities that this is a civil matter and not under their jurisdiction. Otherwise they are notorious for framing anybody under grave charges even though later on it may prove wrong.
N.J. MISHRA
30 August 2011 at 11:58
our is a agency company, having its head office at Mumbai and branch offices at jamnagar, cochin, kolkata, managalore. All the transactions and records are maintained at our head office at Mumbai. After certain period of time, the accounts dept in Mumbai came to know that one of our vendor at the instance of one of our employee at Kolkata office has claimed more amount in respect to work done by the said vendor. i just want to confirm that, if we want to take legal action against the said employee and the vendor whcih police station and the court will have the jurisdiction to entertain the case, either Mumbai or Kolkata. Can we file a police complaint or court case in Mumbai under section 179 of Cr.P.C., members are requested to guide me.
Anonymous
30 August 2011 at 10:05
In case of cheque bouncing, After sending the legal notice, there is a period of 15 days time for the other party to settle the matter.
Does this 15 days include holidays? or we have to leave holidays (such as Ramjan/Ganesh Chathurdhi etc) out and then count?
Anonymous
30 August 2011 at 09:39
What is PRONOTE, please provide details on that.
Under what section a mother punishable
A rapes B.B goes to police station to register compalint.B "s family requested B not to complaint as it would defame B family in society and B mother is suffering from serious kidney failure .A to save himself from clutches of law agrees to marry B .B inspite of every thing wanted to punish A,but after strong pressure of B family she didnt register the FIR but the complain was made and withdrawn on promise of marriage.
A kept B with him and promised to marry for 10 days .A borrowed fifty thousand from B for arrangement of marriage but have not returned and absconded.
,A mother was aware of everything about rape and all when B mother told to fix the marriage date she didnt denied but demanded dowry of 15 lakh if they want to marry their son.When B opposed she(A Mother) abused B and told that in America physical realtion and rape is normal and its not a big deal.(Voice recording is there).She and her son absconded.
B"s freind traced A.A accepted the crime and told he would marry B on arrival of A mother.A mother arrived and B was beaten Badly and denied marriage and threatned of dire consequences which made Made B landed up in hospital for 3 months .
A mother was in full support of A and both spolied B life.
Under what section A mother punishable.Please give case log if there is any