Jolly James 9447287658
30 August 2011 at 05:23
A petition was filed by wife for residence order in shared house U/S 19 of the DVAct. The petitioner was not in possession of the house on the petition date.While the petitioner was away from home husband was lease out the house. Is there any provision to get an order to re enter in the house as per DV Act. I am agreeing that the petitioner has right to reside in the shared house as per section 17 of the Act.My contention is that such a situation the petitioner is only entitled to get an order U/S 19 (f), a rented house. what is your opinion, is it a sustainable contention support me.
abhi sharama
30 August 2011 at 00:23
says : hello sir
MIsc crimal law is the chance of bail is there,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Anonymous
29 August 2011 at 23:20
My wife filed false Sec 498a on me and my family and we have got anticipatory bail. Now I got a call from the police station saying that my wife is ready for compromise and settlement and she would withdraw all the cases once the settlement is reached ? should I believe her or should I go legally contesting the FIR saying it is false ? My parents are really old and they cannot run around to courts in Bangalore. Can somebody suggest a best way around to come out of this mess.
Anonymous
29 August 2011 at 22:44
Eve Teasing Act
Can i have the link for this act as it is not under google.
Also what do u mean by the above act it is applicable in india.
Thanks.
NAVDEEP SINGH SRAN
29 August 2011 at 22:36
Person A threaten & abuse person B.Person B die by heart attack cause due to abuse & threaten.Which sec of IPC will apply on person A.
NOTE ; person A do not touch person B during abuse/threaten.
nishant prateek
29 August 2011 at 22:12
Please help me with supplying the precedents u/s 308 IPC.
Anuj Dayal
29 August 2011 at 20:54
Respected Sir, My name is anuj dayal and i have just enrolled my self in U.P. State Bar Council. My query is that the daily i am witnessing the cases of FIR Quashing but i am unable to understand the logic behind this and why court gives the relief in the form of filing of report by Police under Section 173 of Cr.P.C. If possible suggest me some Supreme Court ruling or High Court rulings so that i can understand the court's approach relating to these types of cases.
james
29 August 2011 at 20:12
Police seized computer hard discs related to a criminal case.Upon the request of the police these discs were sent to Expert for decoding.Expert filed report and discs in one sealed cover in the court office. On the next day accused filed application for certified copy.Magistrate opened the sealed cover without intimating bothsides and issued certified copy to the accused.Is the magistrate right in doing so?why?
Ashok Mehrotra
29 August 2011 at 18:30
Sir,
I am a Consultant for the Pharma Companies, residing in Delhi
I have worked as a Consultant to a Pvt. Ltd. Pharma Co. in Delhi and having a agreement for my Services. Apart from this I am also 2 % Share Holder in the same company. The Company is having Two Promoter Directors only.
The Directors (2 No.) went into for division of their business and made a MOU and I have signed the MOU as 1st Witness. The same MOU having condition in which they shown as the both the Directors having 50% Share Holding in the comapny. As I have signed as witness in the MOU and one of the amendment too on good faith as they promise to settle my issue also in due course.
I have not sold my 2% share to any one of the Directors nor taken any money as price for the share not sign any Share Transfer Deed at any time. But one of the Director got Transfer my share in his name and also filed the Annual Return with the ROC shown over their that my share got transfer in his name.
The singing as witness in the MOU in which I am not shown as a Share Holders of the Company means that I have sold my share or deemed as as I have sold my Shares ??.
The same Director is not willing to pay the cost of my shares nor he is ready to registered again my share in my Name as he explain to me that you already witness the MOU & Its amendment as we both directors are 50%, 50% share holder in this company if you go to any of the Court / CLB then I will show that MOU that you signed as Witness.
Kindly suggest, can I have the matter to file a Case against the Beneficiary Director and to what extent my witness goes against me in the court of Law.
Kindly suggest me the appropriate remedies in which court and what kind of case I can file against the Director of the company.
Thanks & Regards
Ashok Kumar
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Suit for immovable
pls expn what is suit to obtain relif for wrong done to compensation of immovable prop.